Sermons

January 23, 2022: 3 Epiphany

Click here for Today's Readings

Third Sunday after Epiphany; January 23, 2022

Sometimes it takes a degree of self-belief, even courage, to stand up before a group of people and attempt to teach them, or even to tell them a story. Let me say how much I stand in awe of those who teach young children in school: young children can be the most remorselessly honest of critics. By the time that one is teaching adults, any doubts are usually covered with a veneer of politeness.

It is harder still to earn credibility as one with something to say, among people who have seen one growing up. I come from Scotland, a small country where, in small communities, people tend to know one’s background, and to have a healthy (or unhealthy) disrespect for ambition. The tale is told of a Scottish writer called Leslie Mitchell, who a hundred years ago wrote novels of working-class life in north-east Scotland under the pen-name of Lewis Grassic Gibbon. Although the works are now recognized as classics in their kind, at the time they were published, those who knew the Mitchell family were cruelly sceptical of Leslie’s setting himself up as an “author”. One person remarked with scorn “him, write a book? I knew his father”.

That story reminded me of another, nearer home. An African-American young woman named Ann Lane grew up in the family of the James Pharmacy here in Old Saybrook. She followed the family trade and trained as a pharmacist, but nothing was going to stop Ann from writing fiction. Her background and her race told against her, but with great determination she wrote short stories, then submitted a partially completed novel, written in and about Harlem, for a literary fellowship. She won. The novel, The Street, was published in 1946 under her married name, Ann Petry, and sold over a million copies. She returned from Harlem to Old Saybrook, and lived the rest of her life here as a somewhat reclusive celebrity.

I recall these stories because our Gospel tells of Jesus returning to his hometown of Nazareth and teaching in the synagogue. Before the loss of the Temple in 70 CE, synagogues were places where the community gathered for scriptural study and debate. The Jewish tradition of studying scripture entailed comparing the interpretations proposed by rabbis down the ages.

Jesus did not play the game by the old rules. Let’s think about the passage from Isaiah which he read. Isaiah is a long book, almost certainly the work of several authors. This passage comes from the second, or possibly the third, phase in this complex text. It speaks of the restoration of the people of Israel after the exile in Babylon, but also says that the prophet has a special commission to proclaim a time of jubilee, where those burdened with debt or oppressive expectations from powerful landlords or creditors were released from their obligations.

The quotation attributed to Jesus comes from the 2nd-century-BCE translation of the Hebrew Bible into Greek. Most of it comes from Isaiah 61:1-2, but one phrase, translated “to let the oppressed go free”, comes from slightly earlier, Isaiah 58:6. (That matters, as we shall see.)

Jesus does not address the rabbinic scholarship. He says simply and with dramatic flair, “this passage is about what is happening now”. Jesus is the prophetic voice. It doesn’t take too much imagination to think of some of the audience saying to themselves “him, speaking as a prophet? I knew his father.” Other Gospels say that, almost in those words.

The story of Jesus’s visit to Nazareth is on the face of it a story of failure. Jesus does not overcome the credibility deficit experienced by someone who has grown up in a small town. Luke turns up the drama even more than Mark and Matthew, suggesting in the verses following this Gospel that some of the crowd wanted to take Jesus’s life.

Yet the story says something vital about Jesus’s message, whether the people in the story are ready for it or not. It says something about God’s intent to put right the injustices, especially the economic and social injustices, that divide God’s beloved people one from another by wealth, class, gender or race. In Luke we hear this theme in texts as different as Mary’s song of praise and in Jesus’s sermon on the plain. This same theme lies behind the discreet reorganization of the verses from Isaiah. The help for the oppressed is put into the foreground.

One does not have to be a Christian to wish for in a more just society. Many utopian ideals for reforming society come from explicit atheists. And many Christians seem ready to leave out the bit about “bring[ing] good news to the poor” from their understanding of the faith. It seems that one can care about social justice without being a follower of Jesus, and one can at least pretend to be a follower of Jesus without embracing social justice.

But the two things can and do combine. In my workplace of Union Theological Seminary, social justice theme is very high up the agenda indeed. Some of our visiting faculty work entirely on how to address economic and racial injustice (two inequities which are all too often combined).

However, if it is God who proclaims good news to the poor, that good news needs to take on a special character. The world is full of worldly plans to restructure society, and many of these involve remedying the oppression suffered by one group at the hands of another. However, if merely human wisdom is involved, all too often the result is either to replace one kind of oppression by its mirror image, or to set up an all-powerful state which oppresses all equally.

We are all desperately limited people, in our capacity to understand, or think ourselves into, the needs of others. All too often our idea of greater justice will mean greater justice for those like ourselves, or those whom we identify with. God’s love, God’s desire for the fullness of human life does not suffer from those limitations. If it is the spirit of God that sets the oppressed free, then we can imagine, and hope for, something very different.

In God’s eyes, the reform of society begins with the re-fashioning of humanity through the work of the Spirit. If the same sinful, broken, angry people try to set up a more just community, they will only re-make another version of the ills that they try to remedy. But if God works in us and through us by the Spirit, something different will, and must happen.

We need, in our inmost being, to come to see all creation, all life, as beloved of God, as worthy of our love, and our service to enable its fullest flourishing, its growth into its best self. Social transformation begins with self-transformation. That means not just transformation of the individual, but of our communities, our congregations, our churches. We cannot be a clique of the like-minded furthering our own interests, even if we understand those interests as the common good. Look around you, to see what that way of thinking does to our common life.

Jesus proclaimed God’s kind of transformation – but it wasn’t easy. It is not coincidental that Luke placed the story of Jesus’s preaching from Isaiah about the renewal of society in the context of Jesus’s most problematic teaching encounter in Galilee. (Luke is the only Gospel writer who does this.) It is really hard to proclaim a whole new order of life to people who are not ready for it.

Even we, who surely hope to be open to Jesus’s message, have to take full stock of just how ambitious God’s plan is. We are to grow, in the Spirit, into a place where we really believe that everyone, including those whose attitudes and arguments we profoundly disagree with, are the beloved of God. And in that place, we shall at the same time be fearless in speaking about what is wrong in the world, and limitless in our love for those who stand in need of healing and renewal. And we shall keep reminding ourselves that we need that healing and renewal as much as anyone.

That is a big task. But, praised be God, we are not attempting it alone. We have each other, and in our fellowship the Spirit of God can be present, leading us into something far better than we could do alone.

Submitted by the Reverencd Doctor Euan Cameron


January 16, 2022: 2 Epiphany

Click here for Today's Readings

2 Epiphany: January 16, 2022

I changed the order of Morning Prayer today, reading the Collect at the beginning. I thought it clearly set a theme for today when we asked God that “your people, illuminated by your word and sacraments, may shine with the radiance of Christ’s glory…” The prayer assumes that we are gathered to be illuminated by the words of scripture and fed with the bread and wine of the sacrament so that we can then go forth and be a light in the darkness that envelops so much of our world and our lives.

That is quite a task we are assigned, especially since we are not physically together and while the Word is proclaimed, the Eucharist is without the sign of sharing bread and wine and most of us are not venturing forth. How are we to “shine with the radiance of Christ’s glory”?

A Christmas Card I received a few years ago gives a direction. “Ultimately”, it read, “what really matters is a courageous spirit and a generous heart.” Courageous spirit and generous heart; if we could act that way we would shine with the radiance of Christ’s glory. We would cast out some of the darkness that surrounds us.

That seems to me a fair description of what a disciple is called to do, to be. That expresses, in a way, what we signed on to be at our baptism. We renewed the promises last week when we celebrated the Baptism of Jesus. Today, we follow Jesus and his small group of disciples to Cana, a small town in Galilee, to attend a wedding.

We did this by jumping from Luke’s Gospel to John’s. Our reading today begins what students of the Gospel call the Book of Signs in John. It is made up of seven signs, actions that reveal who Jesus is, reveal the “radiance of Christ’s glory”.

Who Jesus is, is proclaimed at the beginning of John’s Gospel. “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God and the Word was God.” The Word became flesh as Jesus, the Son, of God. In John’s Gospel we see people struggle to come to belief in Jesus and thereby enter eternal life and become empowered to “shine in the radiance of Christ’s glory”

The sign at Cana takes place at a Wedding feast, which scripture often uses as an image of the kingdom of God. And Messiah’s arrival is often described as this banquet filled with abundant, wonderful wine. But they run out of wine. And Mary comes to Jesus with the problem. He is reluctant. His hour has not yet come. The time for fully revealing who he is has not yet come.

But signs of his identity are revealed. The water whose purpose is purification of one is changed to the wine, a sign of Christ’s purifying presence. All these are signs that put the disciples on the path to belief. And, as Mary admonishes, they will “do whatever Jesus tells them”.

Tomorrow, our Nation honors the life and message of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., a human being, a disciple through whom the radiance of Christ’s glory shined. We will hear much about “his dream”. But I think more important are his words demanding justice through merciful acts of non-violence to overturn the laws that deny both justice and mercy.

Every year on the Holiday, I read the Letter from Birmingham Jail, which Dr. King wrote to eight religious leaders of Birmingham who had criticized his participation in protest marches against segregation laws and discriminating policies in the city. Dr. King had been arrested for participating in a peaceful march and the letter from the clergy was published during his imprisonment. His Letter is a response to them.

It is amazing how many issues he addresses are still being addressed.

Much has changed but much has remained the same. Among Dr, King’s statements that are well worth remembering today are:

All life is interrelated. We are caught up in an inescapable network, tied to a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly…We aren’t going to have peace on earth until we recognize the basic fact of the interrelatedness of us all.

Let us not despair. Let us not lose faith in humanity, and certainly not in God. We must believe that a prejudiced mind can be changed, and that a person, by the grace of God, can be lifted from the valley of hate to the high mountain of love.

God is present among us, empowering us to see that all human beings are interconnected, that we are all related in one human family.

We listen to these words after we have heard Isaiah present marriage as an image to express God’s love, God’s joy for those who are faithful to being God’s people. We hear the Psalmist sing of God’s love for those who are true of heart. And we hear Paul remind us of the gifts of the Spirit we have received, gifts to be used for the common good.

But our nation is having difficulty acknowledging our interrelatedness. Hope seems to be in short supply. How strong is belief that we are all related in one human family? Without a courageous Spirit and a generous heart can we shine with the radiance of Christ’s glory?

Let us listen to Mary who tells us disciples today to “Do whatever Christ tells us”.

[I suggest you read the “Letter from Birmingham Jail”. Just type it into a search engine on your computer.]

Submitted by Reverend Brendan McCormick


January 9, 2022: 1 Epiphany/Baptism of Jesus

Click here for Today's Readings

1 Epiphany/Baptism of Jesus: January 9, 2022

At this time, many of us are taking down Christmas decorations. Some have already done so. The lights that have confronted the darkness in Nature are making their way to closets or attics. However, our ancient Christian ancestors, who first celebrated these mysteries, we're just getting started.

As a Church celebration, Jesus’ coming in human flesh, began in the 1st century and it began in what we call the East – Egypt, Syria. And the feast day was January 6th and was called Epiphany, Theophany. Greek words that mean “Making known of something hidden, a manifestation of God’s presence on earth. The date, January 6th was chosen for the same reason December 25th will be chosen for Christmas 200 years later: it was the time pagan feasts celebrated the “return of sunlight”. What better time to celebrate the coming of the Light of Christ in human flesh, in human history. The focus was an adult Jesus.

It wasn’t until around 335 CE that Christmas on December 25th was established in Rome. Again, the reason this date was chosen was because Romans celebrated the “birth of light” on this day. At its Roots Christmas proclaims “the incarnation of the Word”. Indeed, the ongoing incarnation of the Word in human life and human history, now, as the carol sings, Christ is “born in us today”.

As time passed, the story of the Annunciation, the journey to Bethlehem, the birth in the manger, angels singing, shepherds watching, Magi following a star are so beautiful, are sung in carols, celebrated in paintings and played out in pageants that today Christmas, for many people, is a return to a silent night and peace on earth when we become spectators to the wonderful birth of the child and celebrate a huge birthday party. If we arrive at that point, we have missed the meaning of Christmas.

Epiphany challenges such a focus. The Gospel read is of a journey of strange people, Magicians from the East. People who thought the movements of the planets and stars revealed events on Earth. They saw something and they interpret it to be of such importance that they undertake a dangerous journey seeking the one born king of the Jews.

This story is found only in Matthew’s Gospel and is used to teach his community that Jesus is a gift to “all the nations”. Not confined to one religion or race or people. Matthew’s community, originally, all Jewish, as was Jesus, the apostles and disciples, now finds pagan peoples of his day seeking the one born king of the Jews. Matthew’s story points out that the divine-human child is being made manifest to these pagans just as it was to those magicians who come in search to worship the child, while Herod who, had all the information he needed to know who this child was, nevertheless is seeking to destroy him. It is a message the Church must listen to again and again.

On this Sunday following Epiphany, we see the Church has quickly moved to an adult Jesus, in whom and through whom the presence of God is revealed. Today, at the baptism of Jesus a voice from heaven declares “You are my Son, the Beloved, with you I am well pleased. “

Who Jesus is, revealed by a star at birth is now proclaimed by God. In the monastic office of Epiphany, reference is made to this baptismal scene, but also to the wedding at Cana and the scene of Transfiguration on the mountain. Strange to include these events when Christmas is still in our imaginations.

But Cana, in John’s Gospel presents changing water in to wine as the first sign that manifests who he is that Jesus presents to his disciples. Because of this, we are told, they believed in him. And on that mountain that comes much later the voice again proclaims, “this is my beloved Son”.

Baptism is the focus today. When we were baptized the sign of the cross was formed on our forehead and proclaimed: “you are sealed by the Holy Spirit and marked as Christ’s own, forever.” We acknowledged that we are Christ’s dwelling place on earth today. In a moment we will renew the vows we made at baptism. We commit ourselves again to do the works that manifest Christ’s presence on earth here and now.

Howard Thurman, Minister of the Gospel, Civil rights leader, mentor of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. helps set the scene for us.

His words:

When the song of the angels is stilled,

When the star in the sky is gone,

When the kings and princes are home,

When the shepherds are back with their flocks,

The work of Christmas begins:

To find the lost,

To heal the broken,

To feed the hungry,

To release the prisoner.

To rebuild the nations,

To bring peace among sisters and brothers,

To make music with the heart.

Let us. Amen

Submitted by the Reverend Brendan McCormick

January 2, 2022: Christmas 2

Click here for Today's Readings

Christmas 2: January 2, 2022

Our lectionary gives us a choice of Gospel readings for today. We could have heard the stories from Matthew of the Wise Men, or of the flight into Egypt; but I chose to read the Gospel passage from Luke about Jesus in the temple, partly because Luke is the focus of our attention this year, and partly because it is not a story that we hear discussed all that often.

This story, presumably based on a tradition about the young Jesus, gives a rare glimmer of light into what are sometimes called the “missing years” of Jesus’s life. Between his birth and the beginning of his ministry, with his baptism by John and his period of testing in the wilderness, we are told virtually nothing. We must assume – from neighbours’ reactions when he expounded Isaiah in the synagogue at Nazareth – that Jesus led an ordinary life up to that point. His life was normal enough that those who knew him were entirely unprepared for his emergence preaching God’s righteousness and God’s kingdom.

We shall explore how the story is told in a moment. Yet indulge me just a little when I say that the temptation to “fill in” the void space in Jesus’s biography was almost irresistible in the early centuries of Christianity.

You may know that besides the Gospels in our Bibles, there is an array of what are sometimes called “apocryphal” Gospels, Acts and Epistles, attributed to and named after a range of apostles. These texts have aroused a lot of academic and also popular attention, especially through the attention of professors with the gift of seizing popular attention, such as Elaine Pagels and Karen King. They are later than the biblical Gospels; some express wayward ideas.

One of these apocryphal gospels is a text known as The Infancy Gospel of Thomas. It filled the childhood years of Jesus with a series of miraculous feats whose moral or theological significance was at best unclear. Aged five, Jesus created 12 sparrows out of mud – on the Sabbath – and made them fly away. He withered up a child who disturbed a pool he had made. A child who bumped into his shoulder promptly fell down dead.

After a series of these miraculous and scary happenings, a deputation from the village went to Jesus’s parents and said he was a public menace: the complainers were struck blind.

When aged six Jesus broke a water-pot, he was able instead to carry water in his clothing. Everything Jesus thought or said was immediately translated into fact. You recall what I said in a previous week about how some in the early centuries focused too much on the divine, miraculous aspect of Jesus’s nature? Here it is happening again.

By comparison, Luke shows nothing in terms of miraculous feats of physical transformation. Instead, he focuses on what mattered to the youthful Jesus.

Jesus cared passionately about the teaching of his Jewish faith, to which he was and would always be fiercely loyal.

So strong was his passion for the faith, that he forgot – or did not think it important – that he had left his family parents unaware of where he was. This is one of several occasions where Jesus’s passion for the things of God outstrips his sensitivity to personal and family loyalties. His “family” are those who do God’s will, rather than those bound to him by ties of blood.

How many teenagers or pre-teenagers have we known, who could be so captivated by their passion for a newly-discovered idea, or a new group of friends, or a new movement, that they lose track of their more everyday commitments and obligations? Nothing seems more normal than Jesus’s passion in this respect.

Then there is the report that Jesus showed astonishing insight in the questions that he asked and the answers that he gave. There was nothing out of the ordinary – then or since – in a young Jewish boy showing passion for the Scriptures and asking pertinent questions of the rabbi. Some commentators note that this story evokes the account of Samuel growing up in the Temple. But the display of outstanding talent would not go unnoticed. Is Luke suggesting that here was a foreshadowing of his divinity, or is it just a hint that the young Jesus would have undertaken some kind of study in his early life, that he “grew and became strong, filled with wisdom” as Luke says in the verses just before this Gospel?

The only real hint at Jesus’s divinity comes in his rather brutal response to his parents, which translates exactly as, “did you not know that it is fitting for me to be about the things of my Father?” Even this has an air of normality – who has not heard an equivalently abrasive response from a teenager?

Allow me to recall to us some verses of the Christmas hymn Once in Royal David’s City, which has traditionally, though not always, opened the Nine Lessons and Carols Service. The middle two verses (often omitted in worship nowadays) express, rather assertively, the normality of Jesus’s childhood, and use them as an opportunity to urge a rather Victorian attitude to family and motherhood. But listen to the fourth verse:

4. For he is our childhood's pattern;

Day by day, like us He grew;

He was little, weak and helpless,

Tears and smiles like us He knew;

And He feeleth for our sadness,

And He shareth in our gladness.

Those last two couplets stress that it is Jesus’s humanity which makes him both able to empathize with our emotions, and to offer a model or pattern for everyday behaviour.

How does this help us?

The Gospels all tread a fine line in their representation of Jesus. Jesus’s humanity was not a mask or a mirage. He was really human, which means that he learned things the way that you and I learn. He did not manifest in his earthly life the all-knowing, all-powerful nature which we associate with God. If Jesus could speak Greek as well as Aramaic – and I do not believe that anyone is quite sure of this – we can be sure that he learned it the way that you and I pick up another language, with time and effort. Yet his relationship with God was wholly unique.

So Jesus must be, all the time, understood as on one hand a pattern who is accessible for us to follow, and a redeemer who can make possible that which is impossible for us. Holding both these things in balance was a challenge to the evangelists, and it is (or should be) a challenge to us, something that we constantly reflect upon.

We can certainly follow Jesus in his passion for understanding the ways of God, as revealed to us through the life and witness of the people of God down the centuries. That will not always be an easy lesson to parse out, because not everything that past ages have bequeathed to us is of God. Much of it comes from a thoroughly flawed humanity and a limited human understanding.

However, we, like the young Jesus, can aspire to understand more, by addressing the uniquely sympathetic Jesus in and through our prayers, and by presenting our questions to each other, in the company of God’s people. Our faith is a life lived in community. That is why in our present state of cautious isolation, we should all pray, as I believe we do, for the return of the time when we can gather together, listen to and reflect on Scripture, share the Lord’s Supper, and through natural and normal communication with each other hear what God is saying to us. It will come, though for the moment we must be patient.

Submitted by the Reverend Doctor Euan Cameron


December 26, 2021: Christmas 1


Click here for Today's Readings

December 26, 2021: Christmas 1

The final part of W. H. Auden’s For the Time Being: A Christmas Oratorio begins thus:

Well, so that is that. Now we must dismantle the tree,

Putting the decorations back into their cardboard boxes –

Some have got broken – and carrying them up to the attic.

The holly and the mistletoe must be taken down and burnt,

And the children got ready for school. There are enough

Left-overs to do, warmed-up, for the rest of the week –

Not that we have much appetite, having drunk such a lot,

Stayed up so late, attempted – quite unsuccessfully –

To love all of our relatives, and in general

Grossly overestimated our powers.

Auden wrote this long – and theologically sophisticated – poemduring the Second World War, when he was in the United States. It brilliantly expresses the collision, which all of us feel from time to time, between the world of faith which we hope to inhabit at least some of the time, and the world of everyday practicalities, to which we are continually dragged back.

And that collision is nowhere more evident than in the Christmas season after the festivities of the secular Christmas have passed us by. For Christmas is a season, not just a day. While the world moves on into retail, sports, and New Year celebrations, we keep observing our season of joy at the remembrance of Jesus’s presence as ‘God with us’. So, I am truly glad that you are here with me in spirit and online.

This text from John’s Gospel is deeply familiar as the culmination of the Lessons and Carols service: “St John unfolds the great mystery of the incarnation”. But this same text was regarded as a special, even a powerful scripture long before the lessons and carols service order was devised just over a hundred years ago in 1919.

This text was used in the Middle Ages as an amulet to offer protection against misfortune: people would read it out when they thought they were in danger, or write it down and wear it round the neck, or even stitch it into their clothing. Some, including quite well-educated people, though it held such power that evil spirits could not bear to hear it: so, bizarrely to our ears, it would be read out against storms.

It has been regarded as uniquely powerful Bible. It can be appreciated as poetry, of course; but now that we have been through the ceremony of the great festival, let us consider what it actually might mean.

In the beginning was the Word. En arché én ho logos. Those words deliberately echo of the opening of the book of Genesis. In the beginning, creation? Not just that: in the beginning, God’s self-expression through the Word.

“Word” does not really convey the sense of the Greek logos, of course. We call it “word”, but it can also be translated as “speech” or “reason” or “discourse”.

If that seems too modern and slangy, you may be interested that a famous biblical scholar of 500 years ago, Erasmus of Roterdam, translated logos as sermo, which in Latin essentially means “discourse”, in his Latin Bible translation in 1519.

God is conversation: an act of speech, of communication, is at the very heart of God, and it is God. That is a great mystery and paradox, and it is meant to be. I do not know whether John the Evangelist envisaged God as Trinity in quite the way that we do: but he certainly envisaged God as conversation, which presupposes relationships.

That does not exhaust the meaning of “the Word”, the logos: it means not just conversation, but also the divine speech by which things were created, the divine discourse that brings into being that which does not yet exist.

John inherited the idea of logos from pagan Stoic and late Jewish philosophy. But he did not leave the concept of logos as he found it. In fact, this chapter is one of the most radical, confrontational texts in late antique philosophy. It says something so outrageous as to be almost crude and vulgar in the ears of contemporaries.

It says that “the Word became flesh and lived among us”.

Late antique philosophy despised flesh. Our physical nature was an unfortunate embarrassment preventing us from living as we should, in the realm of the mind. Wise people in that age wanted to get away from flesh, to rise up into the realm of the spiritual.

Now John, this Greek-educated Jewish writer, proposes to stand all that on its head. John says that the most abstract, most refined, most elevated idea in the whole universe came down to earth and lived among us – not as an abstract principle, but as a living human being: a human being who ate, drank, slept, felt emotions, suffered, and died, only to rise again with his physical scars and wounds still visible.

The hierarchy of human ideas is reversed: instead of ascending to the abstract and the ethereal, we are told to look for God in the people around us, and in the person of Jesus of Nazareth.

Just as Mary, in her song in Luke’s Gospel, sang of God raising up the humble, so John says much the same, in relation to the hierarchies of the mind. The very essence of creative, spiritual discourse, the very heart of God, took the physical, fleshly form of a human being.Take that, smart people.

Where does this take us? In a way it mocks our sophistication, our claims to refinement in faith. We are not to climb up into some realm of highly abstract thought to find God. We are to encounter God in a human being living among us.

The story of the baby Jesus in the manger is not a sentimental tale. It is a sermon in the life of a human being. It says that when God wishes to get really close to us, God does not choose to enlighten a few special souls with rarified divine insights: God comes and lives in our very bodies.

God gave the incarnate, the enfleshed, the embodied Word a name, a family, a home, a group of friends, a personality, even (as I believe) a sense of humour. God allowed us to see the divine in a way that was both clearer, and also more of a challenge, than any abstraction that we might argue over. God is active: God enters our lives. God is not some idea that we can possess, debate over, treat as an object to be controlled. God has taken personhood.

There is more. By entering into our lives, many of us believe that God consecrated the material world and all humanity. That challenges us to see the face of God in all those whom we meet, perhaps especially those who do not seem to be very spiritual or very ethical.

It means something radical and rather terrifying. In this season of the Incarnation, we must try to see God in each other – not just in our relatives, but in all other people in all their frightening diversity. Every human being shares the nature that God chose to assume. That remains true, no matter how different or even offensive we find some of the things that our fellow-dwellers on this earth do, think or believe. It holds good for the refugees of another faith fleeing from persecution, and also for the persecutors whom they are trying to escape. It holds good for those we agree with in our own country and also for those whose opinions on our common life we may find unloving or even repellent. All these people share in the same flesh, the same bodily nature, that God assumed when God came to earth to live among us.

That does not abolish disagreements, and it does not make everyone right. Jesus certainly set us an example of condemning evil thoughts and wrong actions. But even in anger, he wished to draw all people to himself. There was no soul so lost that it was not worth saving. And there is no soul, no body, that does not deserve our care and our respect.

God has taken flesh and lived among us. We can never look at living bodies in the same way again.

Submitted by the Reverend Doctor Euan Cameron

December 24, 2021: Christmas Eve

Click here for Today's Readings

December 24, 2021: Christmas Eve

It is a beautiful, moving story that we celebrate this evening. We know that story very well indeed. Maybe we even know it so well, that it takes an effort to imagine it being heard or read for the first time. But let us try to hear it afresh, as far as that is possible.

Only Matthew and Luke have nativity stories. However, all the Gospels emphasize that Jesus was born, lived, and died in the same physical life as we ourselves live. He passed through infancy and childhood to adulthood.

Here we need to adjust our perspective. For us, the big challenge may appear to be to accept the divinity of Jesus, his extraordinary birth, his miracles, and above all, perhaps, his resurrectionand ascension.

Strange as it may seem, accepting Jesus’s divinity was not the biggest problem for the early Church. Instead, almost from the beginning there were those who could not imagine a divine being lowering itself to such an extent as to take on real human existence. Some people preferred to say that Jesus was a divine being who merely seemed to have become human, and that all his appearances of physical grief or suffering were illusions.

To refute such ideas, the Gospels stress, in emphatic detail, that the Word of God became flesh. And just to make sure that we accept that Christ really came in a physical body, they add lots of circumstances – details which became the Christmas stories which we have known since childhood.

Here allow me to say something which I believe is very important about the Gospel stories. The Gospels record something that happened, but in a special way. I just heard a Roman Catholic bishop on the internet insist, rather aggressively, that the Gospels were history, and described real events. I agree with him that Jesus really lived a human life. I disagree with representing the Gospels as historical accounts.

When we read a story, we typically begin with the narrative details, whether factual or from the writer’s imagination. From the details of the story, we deduce what, if anything, is the message: what it means for us readers and hearers.

The Gospel writers approached things the opposite way around. They began with what the story meant – after all, they had been hearing and re-telling the essential message about who Jesus was for the past 30 to 50 years. From the message, they worked out what details to choose to tell,about how Jesus came to be. But the details were always secondary to who Jesus was and what he meant.

Both Matthew and Luke tell us that Jesus was born at a particular time, marked (as time was recorded in those days) by the names of the rulers of that era. They tell us that Jesus was born in a town, Bethlehem in Judaea – a place we can still visit – and that he grew up far to the north, in a rather obscure Galilaean town or village called Nazareth.

Beyond that point our Gospels struggle a little to fit together. All the ingenuity of faithful saints and scholars down the ages has never satisfactorily resolved the problems. Were Mary and Joseph inhabitants of Bethlehem, as Matthew suggests, who only moved to Nazareth to escape the power of Herod’s successors? Or were they people from Nazareth, who only visited Bethlehem because of a census (which would not have been introduced when Herod was king, as full Roman administration was not introduced in Judaea until after Herod’s death?)

Was Jesus born in the reign of Herod the Great, who died in 4 BCE by our computation? Or was he born in the time of Quirinius the governor of Syria, whose term of office began, as far as we know, ten years after Herod’s death? The Gospel nativity stories are full of loose ends.

The lovely, wonderful thing about these ragged loose ends in the Gospel nativities, is that they show the spontaneity and the committed faith of those first writers. If a scholar in a library had written down the account of Jesus’s life, all the loose ends would have been tied up, all the details of chronology made to match the surviving evidence, whether truthfully or not.

But our Gospels were not written by scholars. They were written by enthusiastic, committedmissionaries, to spread the good news of Jesus as quickly and as widely as possible. They were writing Gospels, not chronicles. They were invested in what the story meant, and in the details only insofar as those details helped to illustrate their essential lesson.

What messages do the Gospel nativities tell us about Jesus?

First, here was a real human being, born in time and space, who also had a unique and extraordinary relationship with God. Two of the Gospels express that by explaining that Jesus was born to the Virgin Mary by the direct action of the Spirit, when God invited Mary to play her very special role in the story of salvation, and Mary said yes to God’s request.

Next, Jesus did not come from the religious elite (as John the Baptist, to some extent, did). His parents were faithful and devout, but not in any sense privileged. Their humility is further emphasized by Jesus being laid in an animals’ feeding trough as his first cradle.

Then God made Jesus’s birth known, not to the kings or priests of Judaea, but to outsiders: political and religious outsiders in Matthew, social outsiders in Luke. Shepherds ranked low on the social ladder. Although heroic figures in Hebrew Scripture had been shepherds, they were often the young of the family, or hired hands. (Jesus, building on the prophets, would liken himself to a shepherd in his own preaching.)

In both Gospels, a message about Jesus’s birth comes from the heavens, whether it is a star or a chorus of angels. It confirms that this is a unique birth. Celestial signs were often recorded as marking the birth of conventional rulers, but our Gospels re-write the script. In Luke the sign is given only to the most modest and undervalued of working people. No wonder that Mary “pondered in her heart” why God gave a special sign to such ordinary witnesses.

Lastly, Jesus is given a genealogy, a line of descent from the great in Israel, even though the genealogies in Matthew and Luke are not identical.

In other words, Luke and Matthew surround the birth of Jesus with all the traditional attributes of a great and mighty birth – supernatural origins, celestial signs, a noble lineage – and they then dramatically, almost satirically subvert all of those things. Here is someone who comes with the fullness of God’s love and favour, but absolutely not in the ordinary way. Yes, this Jesus was born to be great and mighty, but in a way that we did not understand or expect.

Here a new kind of king, a new kind of Messiah, is given to us. We are therefore to look for a whole new order of society in his kingdom. He came at one specific point in time, but also comes to us again, every time we live into his story and share it with each other.

In this new order that breaks in, authority and worth are not reserved for an elite of birth, of power, of wealth, or of racial privilege. Jesus comes to lead us in the Spirit, in a community of sharing, of mutual love and support, a hierarchy not of dignity but of service.

That is astonishingly good news. Almost since the beginning of human society, the really good news was reserved for a tiny, super-privileged elite. Now it is given to the humble first of all – and everyone else is welcome to join in.

And the beauty of the Christmas story is that these narratives in our Gospels, though different from one another, are all outstandingly memorable. They serve to remind us that the greatest and most influential life-force in our history came through the birth of a child, in very humble circumstances, to an ordinarily devout and caring couple.

Let us celebrate and enjoy the familiar and beloved accounts of the nativity, with the glorious music and carols that accompany them. And also, let us hear the Gospel of Jesus’s birth as I believe the first authors intended it – as an amazing, unexpected promise of a new kind of godly order for life on earth.

Submitted by the Reverend Doctor Euan Cameron


December 19, 2021: Fourth Sunday of Advent

Click here for Today's Readings

ADVENT 4: December 19, 2021

There are at least 5 women named Mary mentioned in the Gospel. Mary Magdalene may have been the most important in Gospel times, as she is the first to proclaim the resurrection. However, Mary the mother of Jesus has been most popular in the piety of Christians down the ages. At the same time, she is a controversial figure in the history of Christianity. Different traditions have held different opinions of her. Some esteeming her highly, others virtually ignoring her.

At times, Mary seems to have taken on the role of Jesus in Christian piety. In the history of the Church, Jesus, the loving Savior, sometimes was presented more as a threatening figure, a severe judge of human beings. At these times, devotion to various saints as intercessors who might shield us from the wrath of God became popular. Mary was seen as a most powerful intercessor.

If we look at the Gospel accounts, we see that relatively little is said of Mary. However, what is said is very important. This is especially true in the Gospel according to Luke, from which we read today. For Luke, Mary is important not, primarily because she is the mother of Jesus. In Luke’s Gospel, Mary is the model of a true disciple.

There is a story in Luke where Jesus is preaching to a crowd and a woman is so moved that she shouts "blessed is the womb that bore you and the breast that nursed you - obviously acknowledging Mary. Jesus pauses and responds, "rather, blessed are those who hear the word of God and do it."

These words do not diminish Mary. Jesus infers that Mary's greatness is not from being mother, but from being a faithful disciple - hearing the word of God and doing it.

We see this from the beginning. Our first glimpse of Mary in Luke’s Gospel, is the scene of the Annunciation where we find Mary at prayer. Listening. Hence, she can hear the words of God's invitation through the angel. Mary’s response, her YES opens human history to the Incarnation – Jesus coming in human flesh. And Mary's YES will be repeated in different ways throughout her life. Mary hears the Word and does it.

In her YES, Mary is a model of trust in God. As she says in today’s Gospel reading “the One who is mighty has done great things for me.” Now we’ve just met her so we don’t know whatever that means. Mary is aware of who God is, and she is Grateful. Grateful for the great things God has done and is doing. Essential gifts for a disciple: Awareness and Gratitude. Gratitude for the gift of life, the awareness of being loved by the source of life.

This YES is an act of trust in the One who is holy, the God whose mercy is for those who fear him. Fear is better translated as "Awe", a profound sense of wonder at the incomprehensible mystery who gives us life. Awe - expressed in the words of Gerhard Manley Hopkins. Words that Mary could have said:

Godhead, here in hiding, Whom I do adore

Masked by these bare shadows, shapes and nothing more

See Lord at thy service, low lies here a heart

Lost, all lost in wonder, at the God thou art. (GMH)

I love aquariums. It is like being in another world. A few years ago, on a visit to the New York Aquarium I came upon a toddler standing before an immense tank almost the size of this room, filled with multicolored creatures, all shapes and sizes, floating as if by magic. For many minutes the child stood motionless, eyes wide open “lost, all lost in wonder”, filled with awe.

Wonder seems to be common among children. Us, maybe not so much. We can take the beauty for granted; we can lose the sense of mystery. Even as we learn more of the vast expanse of interstellar space, galaxies, suns, planets in their courses. Even as we see this Island home in all its beauty.

"My soul proclaims the greatness of the Lord, my spirit rejoices in God my savior... for the Almighty has done great things for me, and holy is his Name. What has the Almighty done for you? For what are you grateful? When have you last experienced awe?

What wonderful gifts offered to us at Christmas: Gratitude and Awe.

The Word is made flesh dwells among us.

God who is mighty does great things; Holy is his Name.

Let us be grateful; let us be lost, all lost in wonder, at the God who dwells with us. YES, dwells in us.

Submitted by the Reverend Brendan McCormick


December 12, 2021: Third Sunday of Advent

Click here for Today's Readings

Sermon for the Third Sunday in Advent 2021

This is a special Sunday in the Advent season. This Sunday is traditionally known as “Gaudete Sunday” or “rejoice Sunday”. It takes that name partly from the usual readings: our texts from the prophet Zephaniah and from Paul’s letter to Philippi contain the theme of rejoicing and exultation.

The Church in ages past used this occasion to relax the rules about fasting which were part of the “little Lent” that was Advent. Those with very high liturgical preferences celebrate this day in rose-coloured vestments; we, more modestly, light the rose-coloured candle on the Advent wreath.

“Rejoice” needs a bit of unpacking. It does not necessarily mean that everything is going well. Nor does it mean that one is obliged to generate a semblance of happiness, when things are challenging and hard. Through an accidental reference on the radio, I came across a song which combined the two genres of Bluegrass and Canadian folk music (about which I know nothing). The song was called “Get me through December”, and offered a soulful reflection on living through pain.

Those who have lost loved ones, or who are living through sickness and loss, in themselves or those close to them, may find the run-up to Christmas particularly challenging. I want us, first of all, to give ourselves, and each other, permission not to pretend to any shallow gaiety.

‘Rejoice’ means something different. It means having the gift to recognize that God is among us, even when things are not going well. The prophets rejoiced in the promises of God, even when their people were suffering in oppression or even in exile. Paul rejoiced in suffering, persecution, and imprisonment. There was nothing shallow about this kind of trust. It is a gift of grace.

Rejoicing means trusting the purposes of God, accepting that the meaning of our present struggles may not be clear to us until much later. The eternal God has loving purposes for us which we cannot yet see.

That thought brings me to the other focus of this Sunday. This day is dedicated to reflecting particularly on John the Baptist. We heard a little about him last week, but this is his special Sunday.

I believe that the story of John the Baptist has radically improved in the telling. In some circles, that might be taken as suggesting that our Bibles are somehow not entirely reliable. So let me say that the evolving telling of the stories of the life and ministry of Jesus, across our four Gospels, is for me the greatest possible proof of their authenticity. The New Testament testifies, with dazzling clarity, to Jesus’s followers struggling to work out “what just happened to us?”

In Mark 1 John appears, unexplained, in the wilderness, and after a few lines about his teaching, he baptizes Jesus, and Jesus then takes over in the narrative. In John 1, John the Baptist appears as the “witness to the light” in what is otherwise a theological exposition. Matthew 3 slightly expands the account in Mark 1, with added threats against the Pharisees and Sadducees.

Luke, however, our primary Evangelist for this year C in the lectionary, weaves together the story of John the Baptist and Jesus most elaborately. In the first chapter he describes a double annunciation, one to Zechariah and Elizabeth (apparently modelled on the story of the birth of Isaac and Samuel) and the other to Mary. Then we have the consecutive nativities of John and Jesus.

Here (and only here) John’s mother and Jesus’s mother are kin to each other, and meet for mother-to-be bonding before the birth. Later Leonardo da Vinci, in his exquisite Virgin of the Rocks, portrayed the two rather chubby infants meeting on the way to Egypt, escorted by the Virgin Mary and an angel.

So why did the story of this kinship between these two spiritual prophets and leaders become both so elaborate and so entangled? Maybe the Gospels were polishing over what could have been real discomfort and uneasiness about the relationship between the two. John’s Gospel makes John and Jesus part of the same theology; Luke’s makes them part of the same biology.

Yet our Gospels make no attempt to conceal the radical differences between John and Jesus. John was an ascetic: someone who believed that by abstaining from the physical comforts of life, he could be free to focus on the things of the spirit. He wore rough clothes and ate coarse food, and by leading such an unusual lifestyle, he drew attention to his message.

Josephus, our only non-Biblical source for this era in Jewish history, describes John as “a good man [who] commanded the Jews to exercise virtue, both as to righteousness towards one another, and piety towards God”. And, of course, John was a foreteller and a forerunner. Like many devout Jewish believers, he was expecting the Messiah. John was not clear about who the Messiah was to be.

In Matthew and Luke’s Gospels, he sends followers to Jesus to ask “Are you the one who is to come, or are we to wait for another”. In John’s Gospel, John the Baptist testifies that he is not the Messiah, and yet continues to baptize and follow his own ministry even while Jesus has begun teaching.

So, the relationship which developed between John and his disciples, and Jesus and his disciples, was not inevitably going to be a cordial one. They could have become rivals, with very different ideas about how to lead a religious life. Jesus even made a joke about it, reported in both Matthew and Luke:

“John the Baptist has come eating no bread and drinking no wine, and you say, ‘He has a demon’; the Son of Man has come eating and drinking, and you say, ‘Look, a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax-collectors and sinners!’”

In Matthew and Luke, Jesus says that John was the greatest prophet of the old order, but he does not fully belong to the new kingdom of God that is breaking in. “Among those born of women no one has arisen greater than John the Baptist; yet the least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.”

When you beyond the fearsome, attention-grabbing rhetoric of today’s Gospel, John is telling people to do what they already know to be right: to follow the rules as they have received them. If you do that, then the tax-gatherer raising his fair level of taxes, and the soldier not oppressing the subject peoples, will be as redeemable, or more so, than the ostentatiously religious person.

Jesus has news of something more radical: a way of living where, especially according to Luke (as we shall hear in this year’s Gospels) the old order is overturned, where poor and the oppressed are the especially beloved people of God.

The place of John’s mission, in terms of Jesus’s very different mission, only made sense after the event. It took some decades of reflecting on the relationship between the two of them to sort it out.

Only years after could the first evangelists see that the missions of John and Jesus, despite their differences, supported each other. As they retold the story, they found different ways, some a bit fanciful, to show that integration at work. That was how the story improved in the telling.

The same is true of our own stories. We cannot write the histories of our own lives. We do not know where we are headed. However much we plan for where we want to be, unexpected and unplanned things will happen: illness, accident, or an unexpected meeting may change all that we anticipated. To the eyes of God, and maybe in retrospect for us, they will make sense.

We believe that God, who stands outside the flow of time and to whom all created time is simultaneously present, knows not only what will happen to us but also what we are for. And thus, we are called to trust, and to follow where we are called and led to serve.

And that is truly grounds for rejoicing, because the power of God is not only all-knowing, it is also all-loving in ways that we could not possibly imagine for ourselves. As we live through this time of anticipation which is the Advent season, let us live into the blessing that is the loving hand of God directing our lives, even (especially) when those lives seem most difficult.

I still prefer not to wear pink vestments.

Submitted by the Reverend Doctor Euan Cameron





December 5, 2021: Second Sunday of Advent

Click here for Today's Readings

ADVENT 2 December 5, 2021

“Prepare the Way of the Lord!”

I don’t think John the Baptist broke into song when he called the people to repent. But to us he would have appeared a very strange fellow. Dressed in a camel hair cloak, girded with a leather belt, living in the desert on a diet of locust and wild honey. Gluten free, I am sure. But to those who came out to see, John was dressed like the great prophet Elijah, and his call to repent was far from silly. The word “repent” has the sense of changing the direction of one’s life, turning around and heading in the opposite way, initiating a new beginning.

Repent was a call to action, to do something, take specific steps to change. An example would be someone joining a recovery program to fight addiction described as taking steps toward healing. John was calling for change!

But there is more. These words have a sense of bringing something to life, a new way of acting, a new way of being. Embracing a new reality. All this will be expanded and clarified in the life and teaching of Jesus.

Preparing for new life is not a surprising message for Advent. But the call of Advent is not to prepare for the birth of the infant Jesus. That had already occurred in John’s day and certainly ours. The Advent message and Christmas Story do not invite us to go back and become spectators of ancient events. The message and story are about now.

Christmas celebrates the fact that Jesus came in human flesh to live in human history. He came at a time when all was not calm and bright. Society was filled with injustice and oppression. Jesus suffered and died. But, in Jesus, God revealed there is more.

The life and teaching of Jesus form a lens through which we read the Advent and Christmas story. We are to see ourselves in the ongoing mystery of Christ’s presence and still coming Jesus. The lens through which we are able to see ourselves, each other and our world in a whole new way with new attitudes and values.

The call to this vision is often repeated in the community that has gotten involved with that Being we call God.

The message we read in Baruch must have sounded strange to those who first heard it. Baruch was the name of the friend and secretary of Jeremiah. He, himself could not have written these words as they were written 400 years after his life. They are written to a people under foreign rule, but refer back to a time long past when Israel was in exile.

Confidence and hope in the saving power of God are offered to people in exile or domination. Confidence and joy seem out of place. Joy that all will be restored, and peace will abound seem only a dream. It is a call to faith and trust in a God, when God seemed so absent.

Paul, too, in our reading from his Letter to the Philippians writes serene words filled with hope. But Paul is writing from a prison cell where he faces imminent death. Words of faith and trust in a faithful God, when God could seem so absent.

We hear the call of John as Winter is about to begin. Not the time for new life. Days are getting shorter, colder. Nature looks more dead than living. And many of us adopt a “wintry personality: feeling less alive, spending more time indoors with less freedom of movement. Uncertainty about health and life abound. New life, hope, trust?

Ah, but then there is the Celtic view. The ancient Irish thought these days of winter were the beginning of the growth cycle. The cold and dark forced the seed to germinate in the soil just waiting for the warmth of Spring.

But John the Baptists calls us to repent, to an active waiting. But this does not mean more activity. Maybe the best way to prepare is as Euan said last week: to find time to be calm with God.

Can we look at having more time to be a blessing, not a burden?

This Advent, let us prepare the way of the Lord with confidence in the saving power of God, in a serenity built on hope, with a joy found in the calmness of God.

Submitted by the Reverend Brendan McCormick



November 28, 2021: First Sunday of Advent

Click here for Today's Readings

Advent I: November 28, 2021

Happy New (Church’s) Year! The liturgical year begins each year on Advent Sunday, and on this day each year we begin a new cycle of readings. We are just beginning year C, when the main focus will be on the Gospel readings from Luke, with John putting in appearances at important points.

Advent is in some ways a problematic season. Traditionally, it was a period of abstinence and penitential self-examination, before the great celebration of Christ’s incarnation at Christmas (a “little Lent”). That aspiration to reflective, spiritual preparation has been trashed by that other calendar, the secular calendar of consumption. No sooner have we passed through the commercial overload of Hallowe’en and Thanksgiving, than we are besieged by the exhortations to purchase (specially early this year because of shortages and transport problems) and consume. It was even worse in Britain. With less emphasis on Hallowe’en and none on Thanksgiving, the commercial run-up to Christmas lasted something like a quarter of the year.

We can, and should take the Church’s year, and the Church’s life, as our refuge and sustenance. Live into Advent as a time of calm. Resist, with a good conscience, the pressures of the world to be frantically busy. Make prayer lists rather than shopping lists. Set aside time to be calm with God revealed in Scripture, in sacrament, and in fellowship.

There is another side to our Advent hope. Advent was historically a time of preparation, not just for the commemoration of Jesus’s birth, but also of real anticipation of Jesus’s coming again in “power and great glory” as our Gospel reading for today says. The most famous of Advent hymns, Charles Wesley’s “Lo, he comes with clouds descending” speaks to that very expectation.

What are we, as thoughtful Christians, and fellow-Episcopalians, to make of this powerful historic tradition in the faith and culture of our Church?

First, the expectation of the Second Coming of Jesus Christ is undoubtedly present in our Scriptures, and therefore in the thoughts of the first few generations of Christians. We heard a reading just now from the first Letter to the Thessalonians, which is believed to have been the earliest surviving text of our New Testament Scriptures to have been written. The preparation for Christ’s return forms a key part of both letters to the church of Thessalonika (only one is certainly by Paul). All three of the first Gospels contain “apocalypses”, where Jesus foretells his returning in glory (Matthew 24, Mark 13, Luke 21). When we say in our Eucharistic prayers that “Christ will come again”, we join with that ancient tradition.

For a long time, it was mainstream belief in the Christian Churches that the world would end in the reasonably near future. Martin Luther wrote that the world would last only 6,000 years, and something like 5,500 of those years (since the presumed biblical date of creation) were already over. Responsible people said that one could never know exactly when Jesus would come again – because Jesus himself said that. Yet a serious medical writer called Thomas Browne could write, in the 1640s, “’Tis too late to be ambitious … time may be too short for our designs”. The mathematician who discovered a form of natural logarithms around 1600, John Napier of Merchiston, believed that he had worked out the time of the last days from the Book of Revelation.

There are still plenty of people, in this country and other parts of the world influenced by evangelical fundamentalism, who insist that the Second Coming is imminent. We may be tempted to think of such people as on the eccentric fringes of Christian thought. They perhaps think the same about us. So, we have a cultural problem with the Second Coming. What are we to do with it, taking scripture with the utmost seriousness, as we should?

First, the New Testament shows the writers of the Gospels and the Epistles struggling with this same question. When Jesus had left them for some thirty years, it was realistic to expect his return within a human lifetime. When the catastrophe of the Jewish Revolt, brutally crushed by the Roman armies, took place in 66-70, many of Jesus’s followers saw it as fulfilling the predictions of the final crisis. In fact, descriptions of the end-times and of the Jewish Revolt show clear parallels.

Then, of course, Christ did not reappear, at least not in the way expected. Already in the later writings of the New Testament, in the later works of Paul and the fourth Gospel, we see the beginnings of a new understanding. Christ has come again, but in the transformed lives of those he loved, and those who love him. The restored kingdom is with us, but it lives in the fellowship of the faithful people, in the midst of the messy, flawed world that we all know and struggle with.

Something very important risks being forgotten in the midst of these “apocalyptic expectations”. If this is the message, what should we do about it?

There are plenty of bad ideas about the Second Coming. In the 1840s, a farmer from upstate New York called William Miller calculated from Scripture that the world would end in 1843. When it didn’t do so, he re-calculated the date as 1844, leading to the “Great Disappointment” of his followers. Then apocalyptic thought fell under the influence of a British writer called John Nelson Darby. Darby believed that the Second Coming would be preceded by the “Rapture”, a belief still strong in some American circles. Much time has been wasted arguing about this topic; much money has been made, not least by two authors who have written a successful series of novels (the “Left Behind” series) based on these ideas.

There are other bad ways to anticipate the Apocalypse. Randall Balmer, a fine scholarly historian at Dartmouth College who grew up in evangelicalism, remarked recently that one of the consequences of expecting the Second Coming was a lot of really poor church architecture. If Christ is coming soon, we don’t need beautiful buildings of carved stone: cinder blocks will do.

Worse still, some of those who expect the Second Coming of Christ in their lifetimes, and who expect the physical world to be destroyed in the Apocalypse, resist caring for the environment as God’s creation. It’s not worth caring for a physical nature, they reason, which is destined to be incinerated soon anyway. In fairness, other Christian apocalyptists take the duty of being good stewards of God’s creation much more seriously.

What do the writers of our Scripture say? Their wisdom is that we should live our very best selves, in our own lives and in our communities, as though we expect Jesus to come and find us, asking how we have treated the world which he came to redeem, and the people whom he came to teach and to love; and asking whether we have the faith which he hoped to find [Luke 18:8].

That message never gets outdated. It does not matter whether the end of days is in a hundred years, a thousand, or ten billion. We can strive to live as though we have to account for ourselves to our risen Lord tomorrow. That means, above all, caring for all those whom God cares for. No-one who lives in the expectation of Jesus’s return has any business to tolerate gross injustice, exploitation on one hand and suffering on the other, between peoples, sexes, races and countries.

No-one who thinks that God’s eye of love looks on the whole universe (which it does) should accept the ruthless and unsustainable plundering of this most beautiful jewel in the cosmos which is our world. The more that we think about Jesus’s coming in glory, the more impatient we should be with all the things about our human world that need to be fixed. We know what those things are, and it is urgent that we address them.

How can we? Well, it is amazing how much change can be wrought by simply building responsible, caring attitudes towards people and the world, among our communities and all those whom we meet. It means, quietly, thoughtfully, re-orienting ourselves to the things that matter, and hushing the noise and chatter of the world around us. Don’t obsess about the everyday strident shouts about “crises” in the media, and in our often-depressing politics. Live into the calm, prayerful, loving time that is our Advent hope.

A blessed Advent to you all. Amen

Submitted by the Reverend Doctor Euan Cameron



November 21, 2021: Pentecost 26

Click here for Today's Readings

PENTECOST 26: November 21, 2021

This Sunday, the last Sunday of the Church’s year, is known as Christ the King Sunday. By the Church’s standards it is recent commemoration, less than a hundred years old. Today we reflect on what it means to give the title of “King of Kings” to the risen and glorified Christ.


In a country with such a strong democratic tradition, this celebration sometimes seems a little problematical. Even for me – and remember that Ruth and I are still subjects of a constitutional monarchy, with the word “kingdom” on the front of our passports – there is something jarring about applying the title to Jesus Christ. We think that the things of faith stand, or at least ought to stand, above politics and power.


And yet in the language of (especially) our first three Gospels, the imagery of kingship is everywhere. Jesus is hailed as a king by his followers, and accused of aspiring to kingship by his rivals before the Roman governors. Kingship is his honour and his curse.


This morning I wish to suggest why, in first-century Judaea, the idea of the supreme priest and the idea of the national saviour-king were entangled in one another. It was part of recognizing Jesus as the Messiah, God’s chosen anointed, that attributes of kingship should be wished upon him. Once we grasp this thought-world of the Gospels, we can see how “Christ as King” might be understood as an image and a message for us today.


Israel had a complicated and troubled relationship with its kings. After centuries of “judges”, the people insisted that they needed a king like other nations. At best, the king was there to lead the people in battle against their enemies, to give a sense of security as well as cohesiveness. Unfortunately, as we know in our own time, people can look for security and protection from the most unworthy, unsuitable, untrustworthy figures, just because they project their ego so successfully. Most of the kings of Israel and Judah went bad. By the time of the conquest of the northern kingdom and, a while afterward, the Babylonian captivity of Judah, the kings had failed even to protect the people against the power of foreign aggressors.


Once the people returned to Judaea after the exile, their leadership became increasingly vested in the hereditary high priesthood. The political leadership of the people was, in a sense, also its religious leadership. Even the Jewish Encyclopedia admits that “the high priest grew to be more and more also the political chief of the congregation”. The High Priests represented the people before the neighbouring empires of Syria (ruled by descendants of the Greek Alexander the Great) and Egypt (also ruled by Greek heirs of Alexander).


Our first reading from the Book of Daniel comes from that time in the 2nd century BCE, when the people of Judaea were struggling against the Syrian despots, who represented everything bad about kingship: greedy, corrupt, acquisitive, cruel, and generally immoral. In the language of apocalyptic visions, Daniel imagines irresistible power and dominion being given by God to one “like a human being”. The Hebrew original translates directly as “Son of Man”, which is one reason why this text has become precious for Christians. In a later chapter of Daniel, the prophecy looks forward to the emergence of an “anointed king” after the rebuilding of Jerusalem. “Anointed” in Hebrew is “Messiah”, and in the Greek the same word is “Christos”.


In the 160s BCE Judaea saw a priest emerge, who was also a leader against the tyranny and sacrilege of Antiochus IV of Syria. He was called Judas Maccabeus, and he fused priesthood and rebel leadership in the Judaean imagination. Judas Maccabeus’s purifying and rededicating of the temple in 164 BCE, is celebrated to this day in the Feast of Chanukah.


You will see what I am getting at: in Jesus’s time, the natural way for people to think of a liberating Messiah, was as a warrior like Judas Maccabeus, who would restore the autonomy of God’s people, purify worship, and reunite the kingdom. To expect a heroic priest-king was not a crass misunderstanding on the part of the disciples or their contemporaries: it was the national myth which they lived and breathed. The acclamation of Jesus as king (at his entrance on Palm Sunday) and the accusation that he wished to become a king (made before Pilate in Mark and John) are two sides of the same coin.


But surely, by the time that the Gospel-writers were writing thirty to sixty years after Jesus’s ministry, they had realized that Jesus was not a king in that sense? So why cling on to the image? Why do the wise men seek for the one born “king of the Jews”? Why does Gabriel say to Mary at the Annunciation that “the Lord God will give to [Jesus] the throne of his ancestor David. He will reign over the house of Jacob forever”? Why, in the first chapter of Acts, do the disciples still ask “Lord, is this the time when you will restore the kingdom to Israel”?


The evangelists knew that Jesus did not in fact come to restore the worldly kingdom. The rebels who rose up against Rome in 66 CE wished for that kind of restoration, and the result was total catastrophe. The rebels were defeated, thousands of lives were lost, and the Temple was destroyed and pillaged. To this day one can see a carved relief on the inside of the Arch of Titus in Rome, where soldiers carry off the menorah, the sacred lampstand, from the Temple. Yet the first three Gospels, written under the shadow of that disaster, could not abandon the image of the priest-king completely.


What the Gospels are saying, I suggest, is this: “look, the kingdom was in fact restored to Israel, but in a special, spiritual sense – and most of you did not even realize it when it happened”. All the signs were there (lots of them) but most of you didn’t get it. The kingdom has already arrived, but we did not recognize it.


Let’s suppose that we understand the “kingdom” as representing the best imagined state of community, the freedom and the grace to live according to our very best selves, and in harmony with our neighbours, under the leadership of one who teaches the way of love. Our entire political experience, even at best, is a restless struggle with our deep dissatisfaction at how our actual lives fall short of that kind of liberating harmony.


Yet the coming of Christ has made a special kind of liberation possible. In the community which the risen Christ creates, we are freed from all kinds of anxiety for unimportant or actually harmful things, especially the desire for power over others. No followers of the crucified and risen Christ have any business thinking themselves superior to other beloved children of God. If Christ is our king, in his humility he is our model and our teacher.


In his slightly prosaic way, John shows Jesus trying to make Pilate understand this point in today’s Gospel. John comes closer than any of the other Gospel writers to getting away from the “kingship” image, but even he cannot quite do it. But Jesus says he is a special kind of king – one who comes to testify to the truth, in effect, to teach.


The kingship that Jesus inaugurates is based on making responsible life in society possible for all. As Jeremiah says in next week’s reading, it sets the covenant with God in people’s hearts, so that they will willingly and spontaneously live together in mutual love and mutual service. Jesus’s kingship is based, not on rule or punishment, but on forming his people to live together by their own inmost nature, redeemed by his example and his teaching.


That ideal will never be completely fulfilled in this life, but it is important, first, that the Church try to live as much in the spirit of the kingdom as possible; and then, that we go out from Church into the rest of society, and enrich the wider community through the examples that we can offer. The kingdom of God is not meant to be a huddle of godly gathering together for protection and support, but a lamp on a lampstand.


In living like that, we show a whole new idea of society, of “kingship” to the world. And the world truly needs that.


Submitted by the Reverend Doctor Euan Cameron



November 14, 2021: Pentecost 25

Click here for Today's Readings

25 PENTECOST: November 14, 2021

If you go on the Internet and type in “Predictions for the end of the World”, you can find a very long list from the time of Christ until today. In fact, in the 78 years I have been on this earth there are 84 predictions of the end of the world. What struck me was that some people predicted The End more than once. Pat Robertson 4 times and Jehovah's Witnesses 9 times. You would think credibility would suffer when the foretold day came and went. It also seems strange to me that people claiming belief in a God who sent his only Son into our world and spent so much time and energy teaching and empowering us how to live in this world are in such a hurry to leave it.

However, our first reading reminds us there have been “times of such anguish, such as has never occurred since nations first came into existence”, that the end was something that could be hoped for. This reading comes from a time about 175 years before the birth of Jesus. The empire Alexander the Great built, had been divided into three sections at his death. One section, centered in what is Syria today, was ruled by a violent king who had mercilessly crushed a revolt in Israel in which many were killed and so much destruction that it certainly seemed a “time of anguish that never had been before”. Even worse, this ruler, ordered a statue of himself be placed in the Holy of Holies. The most sacred part of the Temple. No greater affront to the faith could be imagined. Surely, God would have to enter the battle and destroy the evil empire. However, God did not enter the battle. 100 years later this evil empire was defeated by another empire – Rome. Rome, however, became the evil empire at the time the Gospel of Mark was written. In 70 AD the Roman Army put down a rebellion in Israel which resulted in the destruction of the Temple and much of the city of Jerusalem. Most of the priests and many people were killed. At the same time, Christians were enduring severe persecution, especially those in Rome, where Mark’s Gospel was probably written. To many, it looked as if both the Jewish faith and this small Jewish offshoot group that followed Jesus Christ were being destroyed. The end must be near.The first Christians were mostly Jews who proclaimed Jesus to be Messiah. The Jewish scriptures were their scriptures. Jewish practices, on the whole, were their practices; added to and modified. But the destruction of the Temple and City changed Christianity as well as Judaism.

Temple sacrifice and having a nation were no more and so local rabbis and the Jewish communities scattered around thworld were now the anchors of the faith. Torah and Talmud, the Law became the foundations of the Jewish faith as it struggled to survive. Christianity, on the other hand, gradually became a religion of gentiles, separated from Jewish life. From the same roots, two separate religious traditions developed. At times, with disastrous results and unbelievable crimes by Christians against Jews. But when will the end of the world come? We hear Jesus, today, warning us about those proclaiming intimate knowledge of its arrival. “Beware that no one leads you astray.” But then what? These past weeks, scientists have been warning us of the catastrophe resulting from climate change to come. What are we to do? The author of the second reading captures Jesus’ admonishment to us to not be alarmed, but to be aware. “Patient endurance” is not the word Jesus uses, but it is used 49 times to express a gift the Spirit gives for us who are aware. New Testament. Christian communities, living in a hostile world, were called to a life of patient endurance. This is not something passive but a call to action; act with the power to withstand hardship, to not be afraid, to persevere, carry on in the struggle. We are not to be led astray, but we are not to become immobile or unconcerned.The Jewish theologian, Abraham Heschel has said: “True religion begins with the awareness that something is asked of us.” In our Collect we accepted quite a task: “Blessed Lord, who caused all holy Scriptures to be written for our learning: Grant us so to hear them, read, mark, learn, and inwardly digest them, that we may embrace and ever hold fast the blessed hope of everlasting life…”

Everlasting life is planted within us here and now. Let us receive the gift of “patient endurance” and as the author of the Letter to the Hebrews says: Let us hold fast to the confession of our hope without wavering. Let us provoke one another to love and do good deeds. Deeds that preserve our Earth, save the lives of many, care for creation. And finally, through the power of the Spirit, let us encourage one another to endure.

Submitted by Reverend Brendan McCormick



November 7, 2021

Click here for Today's Readings

ANNUAL MEETING OF ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH, IVORYTON CT. NOV. 7, 2021

We stand at a critical moment in Earth’s history, a time when humanity must choose its future. As the world becomes increasingly interdependent and fragile, the future at once holds great peril and great promise… It is imperative that we, the peoples of the Earth, declare our responsibility to one another, to the greater community, and to the future.

So states the “Earth Charter”, composed by members of a global movement working for ecological integrity, social and economic justice, democracy, non-violence, peace, respect and care for the community of life. It was signed over 20 years ago. The meeting in Glasgow last week showed how difficult it is for the greater community to respond to a danger so obvious.

These words can also describe the situation of religious life in our Nation. For the first time, fewer than 50% of citizens claim membership in a religious community. This is especially among the young. A church a few feet down the road closed a few years ago.

All Saints is a small, aging community well aware of the challenges and changes. But we are here, carrying out a life of prayer and ministry that began on this little hill in Ivoryton 126 years ago. And some of you know that All Saints has gone through a number of changes over these years.

For a while, All Saints was a member of the Middlesex Regional Ministry. We shared clergy with 4 other small churches in the region. Seeking more independence, members worked hard and grew enough to be allowed to establish a “partnership“ for 7 years with St. John’s, Essex.

Finally, with even more work, All Saints returned to a self-directed parish with its own clergy. So, change is not new to this parish and the strength of the parish membership has been demonstrated again and again, over the years

However, it is important that we reflect and plan what we, All Saints Parish, can and must do. What comes to mind is a statement by Edward Hale, American writer and clergyman:

I am only one, but still, I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do something; and because I cannot do everything, I will not refuse to do the something that I can do.

As individuals and as a parish we realize we cannot do everything, but we can do something. One thing we are doing is working to assure we can celebrate Eucharist every Sunday. We are blessed to have Rev. Euan Cameron as a member. Euan and I have agreed to share the Sunday celebration of Holy Eucharist. I will still meet with staff each Thursday and serve the other pastoral needs of All Saints. However, the Sunday celebration of Holy Eucharist will alternate and endure.

There are other things the Diocese requires of a parish our size. It is a case of formally identifying Lay leadership capable of managing parish business as well as leading worship if needed. This will be a focus as we move forward. We will keep you informed as we do.

We gather, today, as we are navigating through a pandemic. We have no roadmap, just directions from various health experts and church leadership. For many weeks we celebrated Morning Prayer over Zoom. We now meet in person but not like the old days. But with God’s blessing and your commitment, we will get there.


Sadly, we have lost several faithful members in the past year and a half. We will remember them in our Prayers of the People. In the words of the poet, John Donne, “Each death diminishes us”. However, the lives of these people have also enriched us. They have served this community and inspire us to continue in our service. Most people here do much to keep this parish functioning. Still, we need others to join them. You will be asked, if you are not already working to consider helping out.

Times of change and uncertainty are moments where fear abounds. That peaceful image painted in our first reading of a splendid banquet is not one that describes the life of the Church these days. Nor are we enjoying that victorious image from the Book of Revelations. However, these visions were written and proclaimed when Israel at the time of Isaiah, and then the Christian community at the end of the first century were in great peril. Israel faced destruction and Christians were undergoing persecution. They, too, were bound up with fear. Like Lazarus was bound up in all those wrappings.

We are also like Lazarus in that Gospel scene. It seems that Jesus was aware that following him will place us in situations where fear abounds. That is why an oft repeated call in the Gospel is “Be not afraid!”

Today we hear Jesus call out “Unbind him and let him go!” Can we hear Jesus call to each one of us, today, “Be unbound from the fear and all else that limits you!”. Can we hear today Jesus’s promise: “You who gather on that little hill in Ivoryton, CT, Know that I am with you always”.

Today, let us, the people of All Saints, declare our responsibility to one another, to the greater community, and to the future. Amen

Submitted by the Reverend Brendan McCormick



October 31, 2021: Pentecost 23

Click here for Today's Readings

Pentecost 23: October 31st , 2021

In the Celtic order of things tomorrow, November 1st begins the New Year. On the eve of this New Year, the ancient Irish believed the gates of the underworld were opened; the barriers between the living and dead removed, allowing the ancestors to return to speak to their living descendants to teach wisdom and remind them of the ancient customs and stories. How wonderful it would be to share a cup of tea with loved ones who have entered that life beyond what we know.

When Christianity came, November 1st was changed to celebrate the Saints who had gone before us. However, the Eve of All Hallows, which means Eve of All Saints, became our Halloween, and kept and changed some of these Celtic customs. I don’t think the goblins and witches that come trick or treating tonight know their roots

I was thinking that our Sunday worship can be described as a time we gather in the presence of our ancestors. We listen to the same stories they did, say the same prayers that nurtured and challenged their faith which they handed down to us.

In fact, in our first reading, Moses has gathered the band of desert travelers to do just that, remind them of the faith, the commandments, the Law, the promise given their ancestors. The Book of Deuteronomy, is the last Book of Torah, the first five Books of the Bible. Deuteronomy is presented as two lengthy sermons Moses gave just as Israel was to enter Canaan, what Israel understood as the land promised to Abraham 500 years before.

At the center of our reading, Moses recites the prayer handed down through the centuries: “Hear, O Israel: The Lord is our God, the Lord alone. You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your might.” It is a prayer said several times a day by observant Jews.

While the prayer does not include “love of neighbor” the prophets will continually remind Israel that God’s love embraces the community, and their love must do the same: love one another.

Jesus quotes these ancestors in response to the question: “which is the greatest of the commandments.” We might immediately think of the 10 Commandments, but, there are 613 commandments in the LAW. Even so, Jesus and the Scribe have no trouble agreeing on what is at the heart of the LAW: love of God and love of neighbor.

In Luke’s Gospel this scene ends with the scribe then asking, “who is my neighbor”. Jesus responds with the parable of the Good Samaritan, which proclaims “anyone in need is my neighbor”. The commandment at the heart of Jewish LAW, and at the heart of Jesus’ teaching and way of life contains a demand for an active concern for the well being of others. To have care, respect a sense of responsibility for one another.

We have seen movements to have the Commandments placed in classrooms, law courts and other public places. In this nation that many say is founded on Judeo-Christian values, the commandment both Jesus, and Moses say is the greatest is not among them.

I have told the story of the Apostle John who is said to have passed his last days in a mountain retreat on the Island of Patmos. One year the people of the town below realizing the treasure they had, the last one to have heard the words of Jesus, invited John down for a celebration. At one point someone shouted, John, tell us what the Lord said. John replied, “Little Children, love one another!” People wept and cheered. John returned to his mountain retreat. The next year they brought John down again, and again he was asked: “John, tell us what the Lord said. Again, replied John, “Little children, love one another.”

This occurred for several years and always the same reply; “Little children Love one another. Finally, some said; “John, what else did the Lord say?” John replied, “there is nothing more, little children, love one another.”

Of course, there is something more. Love must be lived out in our daily lives. If we could have a cup of tea, or a glass of wine with those precious ancestors on this Eve of All Hallows, what wisdom might they share? I don’t think it would be about what stock to buy or encourage us to acquire more things. Among the wisdom the great Jewish Theologian, Abraham Heschel learned from our ancestors in our Scriptures are:

The prophets remind us there is no limit to the concern one must have for the suffering of human beings.

Indifference to evil is worse than the evil itself.

In a free society some are guilty, but all are responsible.

We are all in this together, and only acting on this reality will we survive

Let us learn from the wisdom of our ancestors. Care, respect, a sense of responsibility- an active concern for the well being of one another are what endure. They are also actions we need to do if we are to endure.



October 24, 2021: Pentecost 22

Click here for Today's Readings

Pentecost 22: October 24, 2021

‘My teacher, let me see again.’

Today’s Gospel tells us a familiar miracle story about Jesus’s healing powers, and the power of faith. That is extraordinary enough in itself, but there is more depth to the story. Mark compresses much meaning into few words.

In the Gospels as a whole, there are two basic stories of Jesus healing individual blind people: each of those is told three times in different Gospels, with slightly different details.

In a Gospel passage from Mark which we read a month or two back, there is the story of how Jesus heals a blind man at Bethsaida by applying his saliva to the man’s eyes [Mark 8:18-28]. Matthew locates the story somewhere in Galilee, and has Jesus just touch the men’s eyes, as there are now two of them [Matthew 9:27-31]. John relocates the story to Jerusalem, and has Jesus heal the man by applying a mixture of saliva and mud, after which the man washed in the Pool of Siloam [John 9].

Then there is what I call the “Jericho” story. Jesus and the disciples have been visiting Jericho, and as they are leaving (or in Luke, arriving) a blind man (or in Matthew, two men) cry out for him to notice them. In this story, the faith of the disabled person heals them. Mark [10:46-52] Matthew [20:29-34] and Luke [18:35-43] tell essentially the same story.

Why am I taking up your time with these bible-study details? Mark was, by general agreement, the first author to write the Gospel. Mark’s account of the healing near Jericho contains a number of really interesting details, which the other evangelists left out.

First, there is the name of the blind man. It is surprisingly rare in the Gospels for the people healed by Jesus to have ordinary, regular names. We do not know what Jairus’s daughter was called; we do not know who the woman with the flow of blood was, nor the names of the ten lepers.

And it is a very strange name. “Bar-” means “son of” in Aramaic, the language spoken by Jesus and his friends. But “Timaeus” is a Greek name. Mark did not expect his readers to know Aramaic, so explains the name: “Bar-timaeus, son of Timaeus”.

“Timaeus” is not just any Greek name. It was the name of one of the companions of the ancient Greek philosopher Plato. Plato wrote a philosophical treatise in the form of a dialogue, named Timaeus. Timaeus is a work about cosmology, about the origin of the world and of everything.

When a Greek-speaker heard the name “Timaeus” the idea of the origin of the universe, would pop into their head. It was about as inevitable a connection of ideas as “Einstein” is to our generation – even for those of us who have no concept of higher mathematics.

There is another very interesting detail. Mark adds that “throwing off his cloak, he sprang up and came to Jesus”. Luke, who tells the story in almost the same words, leaves that sentence out. So why would the cloak matter?

In the ancient world, philosophers traditionally went around wrapped in a huge, heavy, enfolding cloak (and in some cases, nothing else). It was impossible to do manual labour dressed like that. The cloak showed that one lived by the mind – by conversation and teaching. It was a symbol of status.

Maybe “Bartimaeus” is a symbol rather than just a person. Maybe he represents the one who has been trying to understand the world by the light of his own reason, and has come, after much struggle, to realize that he cannot understand – cannot “see” – anything useful at all.

We need to pause and think how the word “blind” is used in the Gospels. Almost as often as referring to people who have lost their sight, “blind” is used as a term of disparagement of those who refuse to accept the message of Jesus, above all the Pharisees, the “blind guides”, to quote just one example.

In two ways we need to be careful with our scriptures, so that we do not fall short of the love which those scriptures teach.

First, for anyone to be unable to see well, is not their fault.

To refuse to recognize the evident truth: that is a fault, and sadly, it is one that is all around us today, in our public life. To call the willfully or invincibly ignorant “blind” is unjust to those who have, by no fault on their part, lost some or all of their sense of sight.

The second point is this: some of the partially sighted or unsighted find the tales of healing miracles a challenge. They do not necessarily see themselves, or wish to be seen by others, as waiting to be “cured”. They feel whole in themselves, and do not see themselves as lacking.

In Jesus’s day, the unsighted had no system of support, and were reduced to begging to survive. By healing them, Jesus was showing that the love of God extended to those who seemed least capable of achievement: and the message was as important as the gift of healing.

But to return to Bartimaeus: it is best if we take this story as Mark intended, as a symbolic or metaphorical tale about how following Jesus can give one a deeper, more satisfying insight into the workings of the universe than all philosophies.

Bartimaeus knows who Jesus is, and calls out for help: so, he already has some awareness that merely human knowledge and wisdom is deficient. He knows that he needs something more, and that something cannot be won by his effort. It can only be asked for, and it is received as a gift of grace, rather than mere human effort. ‘My teacher, let me see again.’ Let me understand better. Let me reach beyond what I have learned so far.

There is another deeply symbolic part in this story. Bartimaeus casts aside his philosopher’s cloak, which was the symbol of human learning, of human status, and of the reputation for wisdom. He will no longer rely on the reputation that he has cultivated in this world.

What are our cloaks? What are the things that give us status, identity, a sense of belonging to a group, or even of being different from others?

Some years back, in UK universities, there was a regular encouragement (or requirement) of professors to list their “esteem indicators”. These were things like invitations to serve on committees, to speak at public events, things like that. In the business of the everyday world, distinction, difference, matters. Every walk of life has the same kinds of things.

It is not so in the Church of God. We are called to cast aside all those marks of esteem and signs of identity. We are called, explicitly, to recognize the call of God and the love of God in those who are not only different from ourselves, but those who lack any of the marks of identity that matter to us. God loves all of us for the sake of Jesus Christ, not because of our marks of esteem.

That knowledge is immensely liberating. We no longer believe that our worth depends on how we conceive of ourselves against the world’s standards. As Paul wrote in II Corinthians, “from now on, therefore, we regard no one from a human point of view; if anyone is in Christ, there is a new creation: everything old has passed away”.

For Bartimaeus, everything old was cast away. And he was freed to follow Christ, with a clearer and brighter vision of what life was about. So it can be for us.

Submitted by the Reverend Doctor Euan Cameron


October 17, 2021: Pentecost 21

Click here for Today's Readings

21 Pentecost October 17, 2021

We are approaching the end of the Church Liturgical year. Advent begins on the last Sunday of November and, with Advent, the Church begins its new year. A major change will be the Gospel reading assigned most Sundays will be from Luke. Whose feast the Church celebrates tomorrow.

Mark’s Gospel account has been the focus this year. Mark is the earliest and shortest Gospel. As we have traveled through this Gospel, we have heard Jesus Proclaim a new reality: “the Kingdom of God has arrived”! We are called to change, to live out the values of the Kingdom, here and now. We learn these values by listening to what Jesus says and watching what Jesus does. He embraces the poor and outcasts, confronts evil, heals the sick, tells us, shows us how to love and care, respect and assume responsibility for one another, especially those rejected and oppressed by society. Entrance into the kingdom is not based on status, blood, or wealth. There are not gatekeepers determining who gets in and who is kept out of the kingdom. It is a choice to follow Jesus. Be aware, however, living the values of the kingdom leads to an enduring but not an easy life. There will be suffering. However, God will always be present with us. We are not to be afraid. We will endure.

Today we are reminded of the huge problem Jesus faced. People, even his closest followers didn’t understand. James and John were acting according to respected values. Get noticed, get connected, get to the top. But obviously, they have not been paying attention to what Jesus has been saying: A disciple must take up one’s cross and follow. Expect suffering, even death. Become humble and trusting like a child, to enter the kingdom of heaven.

Lads, Jesus responds, there is no top. This is no ladder to climb, no power to seek. Remember, last week Jesus called us to unburden ourselves of worldly goods. Today Jesus tells us we are to be servants. Whoever would be great among you must be your servant; whoever would be first…must be a slave; I came not to be served but to serve and give my life as a ransom for many. What is all this?

We have more in common with James and John than we think. We, too, pass over those hard things Jesus says. His words often clash with what we are taught to live successfully in the real world. The words of Jesus are as much a challenge for us today as they were for those who followed him on that journey Mark relates in his Gospel. And there are people, some who may not believe Jesus is Lord, but who come close to agreeing with some of his difficult ideas.

Eric Fromm was one of the most popular psychologists of the last century. A focus of his research was what it is that makes human beings fully human. Fromm states that perhaps the highest power we have as human beings is the power to give generously of ourselves to others. In the act of giving to another support and respect, care and love, one experiences one’s own value, one’s richness and power as a person. The richness of who we are is not experienced in what we have but in the power of giving from what we have to others.

On the other hand, one who devotes all one’s time and energy acquiring much tends to seek more. It is not one who has much who is rich, but the one who is able to give generously from who one is. Fromm says that one does not become generous because one is wealthy. One sees oneself as wealthy because one can give generously to another. In other words: Be a servant.

G.K. Chesterton has said: “The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting; it has been found difficult and left untried.” Not completely true. Even Jesus’ admonition to sell all, which we heard last week and be servant of all have been tried in various monastic and religious communities. What is true is that this is difficult. Monasteries have become rich and religious leaders have assumed a lot of authority.

But even in the corporate world the theory of Servant Leadership was developed. Servant Leadership states that a management style that shares power, puts the needs of employees first, helps people develop and perform at high levels. However, this is not the normal style taught and implemented in the corporate world.

The challenge of the Gospel is as real today as it was for James and John, and every disciple. When we read Luke’s Gospel, next year, we will come to a chapter frequently referred to as “The cost of Discipleship”. It is not cheap. So, we read the Gospel every week not to know history but to be reminded what is asked of us. Also, to remind us that Jesus did not give up on James and John; nor has he given up on us.

Today, we are invited again to listen to the challenge. To remember the promise of the presence of the Spirit, here and now, present in each of us. Rev. David Brown’s favorite description of the Spirit is “the encourager”. Encouraging us to hear the word of God, encouraging us to do it. Encouraging us to be servants.

Submitted by the Reverend Brendan McCormick


October 10, 2021: Pentecost 20

Click here for Today's Readings

20 Pentecost: October 10, 2021


“Go, sell what you own, and give the money to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; then come, follow me.”


The former Dean of Yale Divinity School told me once how he used to teach a course in New Testament studies on “difficult verses in the New Testament”. Students were invited to choose a really challenging verse in the Gospels and the letters, and to spend part of the semester exploring how to deal with it, alongside their colleagues and their difficult verses. The example which Dean Attridge gave of a difficult verse, was the very one which I have just quoted.


Make no mistake about it, every human community tends to be organized, partly or wholly, around the distribution of resources, what we call wealth. Our twenty-first-century society suffers from this condition to a particularly extreme degree.


When one reaches my age, one is besieged by messages from the media about whether one has saved enough, or invested enough, to make one secure in retirement. The message is that completing one’s life in comfort and security will depend upon having put enough money aside in the earlier years of life.


Other parts of the media seem fascinated with ranking the wealth of captains of industry and other celebrities, or of glimpsing the often indecent and sometimes outright vulgar luxury in which they live. Lotteries nurture the idea that a chance win could transform one’s life.


Behind that are much more serious issues. The political culture of the US, whether of the right or the left, expects individuals to be responsible for their welfare, and to wish to reap and keep the rewards of their labour, to a degree that is very unusual in the wider world. It is even strange compared to the way society was organized in this country two generations ago. Society has become more individualistic, more resistant to the idea of redistribution of wealth than when I was a child. Quite simply, as nations, we tax less than we used to. The top marginal income tax rate in the US in 1960 was 91%, even though very few earned enough to pay it.


The consequence, as we all know, is that inequality has become more extreme. It is estimated that the upper half of the population, by wealth, owns 98% of wealth of the United States. The less wealthy half (and remember, that is something like 150 million people) shares something like 2% of the wealth of the country. More importantly, the life which we in the wealthier countries of the world enjoy is made possible by taking economic advantage of less wealthy countries. We live in a world of chronic, structural economic injustice.


Jesus knew all about this kind of inequality. The ruling elites of the Roman Empire lived with an extravagance exceeding even that of modern billionaires. Close by the Colosseum in Rome, one can explore the remains of Nero’s palace, known as the “Golden House”. It is now largely buried under an artificial spoil-heap hill created when it was abandoned, as an embarrassment, by later emperors; but it still has vast, echoing corridors and rooms covered in wall-paintings. (Ruth and I visited it five years ago and were overwhelmed by its scale.) In Judaea, the family of the Herods, though they were little more than jumped-up governors under the rule of Rome, lived in grotesque luxury and self-indulgence.


Jesus knew all about gross inequalities of wealth, and yes, he certainly called on those who loved their neighbours to care for them, to give and lend to them. He knew that in his own tradition, many passages in the prophets – like our reading from Amos – warned against the abuse of economic advantage. Even before that, the Psalms repeatedly stress that to lead a life in harmony with God’s law, is better than to make unjust profits at the expense of others. To give just two examples, Psalm 37:12 says “The little that the righteous has is better than great riches of the wicked”. Psalm 62:12 advises “though wealth increase, set not your heart upon it”.


However, Jesus did not, I suggest, seek to replace an obsession with wealth by an obsession with voluntary poverty – nor even with an obsession with redistribution of wealth, or marginal tax rates.


Down the centuries of the Christian Church, some who sought to follow Jesus believed that if possessions are an obstacle to the kingdom, then the way to earn one’s way into God’s favour was to go entirely without possessions. In the Middle Ages St Francis, and the movement which he founded, made absolute, utter poverty their dominant principle. At one point they insisted that not only as individuals, but also as the order of Franciscan friars, they must own absolutely nothing, not even the habits they wore, the books they read from, or the buildings where they lived and worshipped. They tried to vest all their property in the pope. It was all right for the pope to fall short of Christian perfection, but their order must not.


No, I believe that this Gospel has a more radical message even than that. Jesus was, and is, teaching that the kingdom of God – the community which God calls into being through the Gospel – is not defined by wealth or poverty, high or low status, or by any of the ranks and orders by which we organize worldly, human society. Wealth is not a metric in God’s sight.


Secondly, Jesus makes clear, in a way that might easily be overlooked, that because rank and status do not matter in the kingdom of God, therefore entrance to it, membership of it, is an act of pure love on God’s part. We are called and accepted not because we have achieved anything at all, whether by gaining wealth or giving it away. We are accepted because God loves us, in spite of all the ways in which we fall short.


That does not mean that one need not do good things with one’s resources, especially supporting those in need, and working to build up and strengthen the community where the Gospel is shared and lived. One should certainly do all those things, as a response to how God’s love is poured out upon us. But our wealth, or even our generosity, does not define our place in the kingdom: it certainly does not make God love us more than God already does.


Then, what are we to make of the last paragraph of the Gospel reading? Peter points out to Jesus that surely, the disciples have indeed given up everything to follow him? Jesus says something striking and maybe puzzling. He says that everything that his followers have left behind will be, in some sense, returned to them in this life, as well as bringing them eternal life.


It seems that this saying foreshadowed how the society of Jesus’s followers would live after Pentecost. Those who had been made rootless by leaving their families and communities to follow Jesus, would find that they had a new community, a new family. They would receive all the sense of belonging and security that it could give them, defined not by their social and economic status in the world, but by their belonging to the community of the Gospel.


The passage ends with a saying found several times in the Gospels of Mark, Matthew and Luke in various forms, that “many who are first will be last, and the last will be first”. This is intended as a warning: don’t assume that your status in the world reflects how God sees you. Above all, do not assume that outstanding feats of holiness, generosity or leadership will place God under an obligation to place one in a particular rank. The disciples sometimes thought that way, and Jesus warned them against it. God’s love is far more generous than any human system.


This Gospel passage is intended, I believe, to offer us the greatest freedom from the greatest source of anxiety in this age, or any age. It does not mean that those who have little should be irresponsible with their resources; and it certainly does not mean that those who have much should hoard it, or seek always to increase their share. It teaches us where to look for our real well-being, our ultimate source of joy, strength, security and blessedness. And thank God, that has nothing to do with our ranking on some financial index.

Submitted by the Reverend Doctor Euan Cameron


October 3, 2021: Pentecost 19

Click here for Today's Readings

19 Pentecost: October 3, 2021

Karl Barth, one of the great theologians of the last century is quoted: “clergy should prepare the sermon with Bible in one hand and the newspaper in the other.” The Word of scripture should relate to events in our daily lives. The scripture readings today are clearly relatable to topics that have been very much in our newspapers and other media: the health of Mother Earth, the status of women in our world, our attitude and actions toward the vulnerable and powerless refugees, and footprints in New Mexico.

Beginning with this last news item, archeologists have found fossilized footprints left by people who walked 23,000 years ago in an area of present-day New Mexico. Up till now, scientists have thought humans arrived in North America 13,000 yeas ago. Such knowledge will force us to rethink many things.

Discoveries like this have been going on for hundreds of years in Biblical lands, forcing us to rethink things in our Bible, giving us new understanding of many texts. Some of the discoveries have provided creation stories from other cultures, more ancient than what we read in the Bible. Comparisons show that biblical writers often borrowed from these stories. This has enabled us to learn more of what Biblical writers intended to say, especially when we see what the biblical writers changed in these stories.

It is important to realize that the Creation Story is just that – a story, not a scientific or historical presentation. It is meant to teach, but what it means to teach is not always what people learn. The first words of our Bible are: “In the beginning, God created the heavens and earth”. In a popular Babylonian Creation story, most likely known to the Biblical writer, many god’s were involved in a violent conflict. Some gods were good, others evil.

The created world that resulted from this conflict was a hodgepodge of good and evil. “One God created all” proclaims the Biblical writer. Also, our Bible uses the days of the week to show that creation was done in an orderly manner, with a loving design, not in chaotic battles among gods.

Among Israel’s neighbors the stars and planets, the sun and moon were deities who determined our lives. (What’s your horoscope). In Genesis these planets are “works of God’s fingers”, as the Psalmist declares, created objects that, serve humans, marking the seasons, dividing our day from nights.

And “God saw that all of it was good”. Matter is not evil as other ancient creation stories proclaimed, but sacred. But we do not treat Creation with the awe expressed by the Psalmist today (“When I consider your heavens…the moon and stars…I wonder). Fires and floods, storms and heat are destroying the sacred gift God has given us. The cause of this destruction is largely the result of human activity, human neglect. This week, scientist have stated that over 20 more species have become extinct. Both science and faith are calling us to action.

Our reading today is a second creations story awkwardly attached to the one we find in the first chapter of Genesis. In that first chapter human beings are created last, the crowning glory of creation. “Male and female, made in the very image and likeness of God. In this second story, humans are created first, not last. And the first human shares in creation, naming the other created beings.

All these other beings are created from “The ground”, we are told. But something is wrong: “none was found to be a helper, a partner equal to the human. So, God makes a partner, not from the “ground” but from the very same material. The image of the rib is to express this equality, the shared humanity of man and women.

As we read our Bibles, we see that the people who read these first two chapters did not live their teachings. Women were not seen as equal partners, made in the same image and likeness of God. But that failing is one we share.

Our newspapers and other media seem to have moved on from events in Afghanistan, where the leaving of US troops has seen diminishing rights, especially for women. A serious situation, but unfortunately, not unique. We seem to forget that women were not allowed to vote in this nation for 122 years. It was 145 years before a woman had even a cabinet role, and today, we celebrate the rise of women in federal government, but they still make up just over 20% of elected members.

“Male and female, made in the image and likeness of God”; “bone of my bone and flesh of my flesh”, are powerful words proclaiming the equality of women and men. An equality we do not live and an equal dignity denied by religious groups who hold the words of our Bible as sacred.

Divorce is one example. At the time of Jesus, a man could divorce a wife, but a woman had no such power. All a man needed to do was inform the wife that she was divorced. No appeal, no legal protection. Certainly, the injustice in the practice was a basis of Jesus’ response to the pharisees’ question. But Jesus begins his response by quoting the words from Genesis declaring this equality of women – made in the same image and likeness of God. And yet, Abraham had three wives, Jacob two. David is said to have 7 wives and Solomon 700.

Perhaps a biblical exaggeration, but the ideal expressed by Jesus that “two become one flesh” was not “from the beginning.” The issue of divorce was only one example of the “hardness of heart” of our ancestors – and ourselves. And the issue of divorce can not be separate from the position given women.

Our Church has come to the conclusion that justice and mercy and dignity are often possible only if divorce is possible. The belief that male and female are made in the image and likeness of God has yet to be lived out in the Church and society. When we can live that reality, we will better understand the issue of divorce.

Our Gospel ends with Jesus embracing children and proclaiming of such is the kingdom of heaven. We find it easy to attribute to children innocence and trust and infer that this is Jesus’ point. But children are also vulnerable and powerless – like the many refugees at our borders and around the world. This may not be Jesus’ primary focus here, but the many, many, many demands in the Bible for the care of refugees are unambiguous.

Tomorrow is the Feast of Francis of Assisi. A quote attributed to his says: We are to preach the Gospel every day, and sometimes with words.

Today we are reminded to proclaim in word and deed that God’s glorious creation is given to our care. Reminded that Jesus is not ashamed to call us brother and sister, made in the image and likeness of God, created equal in dignity. And, finally, reminded that we, like children, are called to trust in God’s loving embrace , and to share this embrace with the powerless and vulnerable brothers and sisters among us.

Submitted by the Reverend Brendan McCormick


September 26, 2021: Pentecost 18

Click here for Today's Readings

18 Pentecost: September 26, 2021

“Have salt in yourselves, and be at peace with one another.”

This week’s and last week’s readings are drawn from two consecutive extracts from the ninth chapter of Mark’s Gospel. These two weeks have a fairly similar theme. They address the risk that, even among the followers of Jesus, there will be just the same posturing, the maneuvering for prestige and status, that happens in nearly every community.

Last week we heard the disciples admit to Jesus, rather sheepishly, that they had been arguing on the road as to who was the greatest. You might think that after Peter’s declaration that Jesus was the Messiah, after the Transfiguration, after so many healing miracles, the disciples would be content to know that they were all the friends and companions of the Son of God. Wasn’t that enough? Apparently not. The relentless pressure for higher status than all those around one, worked its sorcery even among the apostles.

A few pages later, in the next chapter, the brothers James and John will ask Jesus for the special privilege of sitting at the right and left hands of Jesus in his glory: and the other disciples are not slow to express their resentment.

One of Mark’s recurring themes is that the disciples never really “get it” while Jesus is with them. Only with the Passion and resurrection does his message begin to make sense. But more than that – Mark knew that the issues which troubled the first disciples would continue to trouble the churches afterwards. Fallen as we are, we do not lose our restless striving for esteem, just because we have been loved beyond imagination by the sacrificial love of God. That should be enough – always – but it may not be so in practice.

So, let’s look at today’s reading in that context. Our Gospel opens with the story of someone casting out demons in the name of Jesus, who was not a disciple. Jesus answers, in effect, that “if he invokes my name, then he is committed to my message: let him be”.

What Mark seems to be referring to, a little obliquely, is that in the early Church there were many different communities gathered in the name of Jesus. Maybe they had slightly different recollections of what Jesus taught; maybe they understood who he was in a slightly different way. That would surely be the case for centuries afterwards – and it remains so today. Mark seems to be saying, “let’s not be sectarian about this”: let’s acknowledge that we have sisters and brothers who call on the name of Jesus differently, and it is good that they call on him.

The story of the exorcist in our reading from Mark evokes the story of the prophets Eldad and Medad from the Book of Numbers, which we heard in our first reading today. There, as here, God is pleased with those who speak sincerely in God’s name, even if they don’t necessarily belong to the chosen group.

Then we get to the really difficult passage, with the sayings about cutting off hands and putting out eyes. Given the unspeakably cruel things which human beings sometimes do to each other, I expect you find this a hard saying to hear: I certainly do. But of course, it is a graphic, attention-grabbing image, and nothing more than that. Let’s look beyond the graphic images, to what seems to be the message of this remembered saying.

We each of us hold things very dear to us. They may be values, ideals, priorities, ethical or cultural principles. These are so essential a part of oneself, that they feel like a hand, or a foot, or an eye. And yet, maybe these strongly, passionately held values may be an obstacle, hindering either us or others from becoming a full part of God’s new order of society. Maybe our passionate feelings estrange us from those we love within the open, inclusive community that the risen Christ is calling into being through the Holy Spirit.

How many times has the church been divided, and still remains divided, by those who believe that they are upholding a vital principle, something important for God, but which in context becomes a cause of stumbling to oneself or others?

In the Church of England, I recall the intense debate some thirty years ago (can it really be that long ago?) when the church was on the brink of ordaining women to the priesthood. The Episcopal Church had discerned God’s call to women nearly twenty years earlier, but in England it took longer (as it always seems to do). Distressingly harsh things were said, on either side of the argument, by those who believed passionately that they were upholding the message of Scripture and tradition. I am willing to believe that many, maybe most, of those with whom I disagreed were sincere in their beliefs. But the passion behind their feelings was a stumbling-block to those who might have been called by the Gospel, and certainly to those whom the Spirit was calling to ministry.

Over the past weeks we have been listening to readings from the Epistle of James. This pastoral letter, sometimes rather a scolding letter, is traditionally attributed to the first leader of the church in Jerusalem, known as “James the Lord’s brother”. He was not one of the twelve, but rose rapidly to leadership after Pentecost.

Much of James’s letter consists of a warning to his readers and hearers about the abuse of the tongue, about contentiousness, about the desire to be seen as cleverer, wiser, more influential than the next person. In last week’s reading, you may recall, James contrasted worldly, ambitious wisdom with the heavenly wisdom, the wisdom from above, which he described as “peaceable, gentle, willing to yield, full of mercy”. In this week’s sequel, James envisages the kind of community where that kind of wisdom prevails, and where people share in their rejoicings and support those who are in any kind of distress.

James used a word which has strong resonances for me. The word which is translated as “gentle” is the rather beautiful Greek word epieikes, which means keeping to moderation and temperateness in debate.

In my work as a historian, I have often studied the work of Martin Luther’s closest colleague in the church of the mid-16th century, a scholar and teacher who went by the name of Philipp Melanchthon. Luther was a restless volcano of a man; Melanchthon was the one who tried to calm things down. To be moderate and temperate in debate, to have what he called epieikeia, was a watchword for Philipp.

Did it keep him out of trouble? Not in the slightest. When he tried to be moderate, and to go as far as he felt he could in accommodating his conservative Roman Catholic conversation partners, those within his own camp accused him of being soft, even of betraying the cause. It took centuries for his reputation to recover. No attempt to have a good attitude, you might say, goes unpunished.

The question is, when does defending a cherished value become a stumbling-block? When is the time to yield, and when to stand firm? Answer: I am not sure that we always know. And that is the wonderful beauty of Jesus’s teaching. Like many a good teacher, Jesus does not set down an inflexible set of rules which all we have to do is follow. He proposes things for us to think about, to ponder how they work in different situations, and yes, to debate about.

And by debating what God calls us to do, in the community where we find ourselves placed, we make space for the Spirit. That is why to debate with gentleness, with epieikeia, is so essential. If we discuss patiently, listen attentively to each other, we allow room for the Spirit to be present among us and to be heard. And as our Gospel says, we can “be at peace with one another”.

Submitted by the Reverend Doctor Euan Cameron


September 19, 2021: Pentecost 17

Click here for Today's Readings

17 Pentecost: September 19, 2021

“Keep Calm and carry on - a phrase that has become visible everywhere; printed on posters, tea cups, clothing. It originated in 1939 when advisors persuaded the British Royalty to use the phrase to stiffen British resolve as the war approach and the prospect of the bombing of English cities seemed inevitable. The posters, however, had limited distribution at the time. British stiff upper lip had to save the day. However, in 2000 a few of the old posters surfaced and now everywhere and often we are encouraged to “be calm and carry on”.

But looking back, the original encouragement to “Keep Calm” was not successful. At least that was the opinion of W.H. Auden. A British poet, . Auden wrote a Pulitzer Prize winning book length poem in 1947, titled, The Age of Anxiety. Referring to the generation admonished to “Keep Calm”. Of course, many of the people in that age lived through two world wars, a depression, the Holocaust and the explosion of Atomic Bombs. It’s not surprising that psychologists diagnosed widespread loneliness in a people anxious about the meaninglessness of life and disillusionment with modern industrial society. Can you blame them?

But present day psychologists argue that WE live in the age of anxiety. Uncertainty on many levels and negative effects of social media have worked to make anxiety one of the greatest worldwide health issues. With good reason, then, we began our worship praying: “Grant us, O Lord, not to be anxious about earthly things…” , because we are.

Perhaps it has always been so. Look at Jeremiah in our first reading. There was much to make him anxious. He was an outspoken prophet who had a miserable life.

Much of the misery Jeremiah blamed on God, who sent him to proclaim rather unpopular words. Jerusalem was surrounded by the worlds most powerful army of Babylon. In this tense, anxious filled time, Jeremiah was sent to condemn and refute the words of the priests and politicians, who told the people not to worry, God was on their side. Jeremiah advised surrender which made most people think him a traitor. His nickname was “Old terror on every side”. “Gloom and doom seemed his message. Many did want to lead him to slaughter. But there were reasons to be anxious, reasons to be terrified.

Our psalmist was certainly anxious. “The arrogant have risen up against me; the ruthless sought my life.” He, or she, asks God to destroy these arrogant ones. Not a prayer we are encouraged to pray. Not likely to lessen anxiety.

:We find no refuge in the Letter of James. Over these past weeks we have heard him address what must have been a rather unruly community torn apart by prejudice and conflict between people of different social and economic class. It is almost in frustration that we hear James tell them: “Submit yourselves to God, resist evil and draw near to God”.

Wait a minute, in the Gospel Jesus seems to say if we want to draw near to God, we must be willing to carry a cross, endure suffering, be servant to all. And yet, so many times in the Gospel we are told “ Don’t be afraid!” Don’t be anxious. At least don’t be paralyzed by fear, dominated by anxiety. We have heard God’s promise to be present with us always. So, the question is how we can be present to the present God. How can we do what we prayed in our Collect: “Hold fast to those things that shall endure.”

Our religious tradition is rich in response to such a question. We are encouraged to set aside time and place each day for prayer and reflection. We have been called to a community in which we are nurtured, supported, loved and healed. We have promised to have an active concern for the wellbeing of one another. At the heart of our prayer, we are made aware of the gifts we are given and called to be grateful. These are among the things that endure.

A book I received a few years ago recently made its way to the front of my bookshelf. “Hope Dies Last “, by one of Chicago’s great writers and radio interviewer. It is a series of conversations of little-known people who did important things. They were people who acted out of hope, in situations that lacked obvious prospects for success. Their lives remind me of the words of a French poet: “Faith believes, love serves, but little hope gets up in the morning.”

Hope is a decision to not be afraid; a decision to be nourished by prayer, reflection, community; to be grateful and have an active concern for the well being of others, to get up in the morning and work to be the person God created me to be. If we did those things, I think we would be a little less anxious. Perhaps even calmer.


September 12, 2021: Pentecost 16

Click here for Today's Readings

16 Pentecost: September 12, 2021

Some of you are old enough to remember when the radio was the primary source of information and entertainment. I listened to shows like Fred Allen, Fiber McGee and Molly, The Shadow, The Lone Ranger, Inner Sanctum, and, my favorite, Gunsmoke.

The beauty of the radio was that each listener designed the scenery and painted a picture of each character. Marshall Dillon was the hero of Gunsmoke. His rich baritone voice allowed me to picture the Marshall as a tall, strong, rough and ready cowboy, imposing law and order in the wild west.

When television came along some of these programs were transferred to the screen. For Gunsmoke, there was a problem. Matt Dillon on the radio was played by an actor with a rich baritone voice, but he was 5 ft. 5 inches tall and weighed almost 300 pounds. Hardly the figure to jump on a horse and chase outlaws across the western plains. The image I had did not fit the real person.

This does not only happen with physical appearances. Our expectations of who the person is can distract us from who they really are. So, Jesus asks the disciples: “who do people say I am?”

As we have read Mark’s Gospel, we see that people have seen him as the hoped-for Messiah. Jesus has shied away from this title, aware that he will be a different “Messiah” than people expected. He was revealing a God not of power and force and domination, but a God of care and compassion, enduring love and faithfulness.

The disciples answer Jesus’ question, placing him in the line of the great prophets of Israel. But then, when Jesus asks a more personal question: “Who do YOU say I am?” Peter rises to the challenge: “You are the Messiah.” Not ONE of the prophets, but THE prophet, the one who would bring about the Kingdom of God.

But then follows the clarification. Echoing the words of the Prophet Isaiah which we read today, Jesus reveals that he will undergo great suffering and be killed.

Peter reacts. Rebukes Jesus, even. But then Jesus rebukes Peter and adds that one who follows him will also be required to “Take up one’s cross”. Following Jesus is not an escape from suffering. Rather, a disciple will enter into the mystery of suffering.

We certainly have learned that. We have moved beyond the radio age. Today technology brings into our living rooms pictures of suffering: rescuers digging through ruins of buildings in Haiti searching for survivors, flames engulfing homes in California, flooded neighborhoods in New Orleans, hospital rooms packed with people suffering and dying of Covid 19. Much, if not most of what is presented as news are pictures of people suffering. And yesterday, memories of 20 years ago have reminded us of so much suffering of so many. Suffering that is still alive and present in so many others.

Why do people suffer is a question echoed everywhere and always? But the people for whom this Gospel story was originally written already knew that Jesus had already born a cross and died on a cross. But they also believed that the cross led to the victory of resurrection and Christ’s return to the Father, and the gift of the Holy Spirit – God dwelling within and among them.

They had been baptized into that power and presence of God. So, why were they suffering. Where was the power of Resurrection and the power of God’s presence? The words of the Gospel we read today were a response to this community.

The Gospel does not explain the mystery of suffering but it does say something. Suffering is not God’s punishment of us. The Book of Job refutes that idea, and John’s Gospel story when Jesus and the apostles meet the man born blind, they ask Jesus for whose sin, his own or his parents was he born blind. Neither answers Jesus.

Not all suffering is a mystery. People oppress others. Violence by one person causes the suffering of others. But for many, that is not the case. So often, suffering is a mystery.

The message of the Gospel is that suffering is not God’s punishment, nor does God abandon us in suffering. God is present with us in the midst of suffering. The last words of Jesus in Matthew’s Gospel are “know that I will be with you always, until the end.”

How does God do this? St. Teresa of Avila reminds us: “Christ has no body on earth but yours. Yours are the eyes with which he looks compassionately on the world. Yours are the feet with which he walks to do good. Yours are the hands with which he blesses all the world.”

Christ has sent us to one another to be the instrument of God’s loving, healing, supportive presence in the midst of suffering. We cannot prevent suffering. But we can be instruments of hope. I think the Gospel says, we must.

Submitted by Reverend Brendan McCormick

September 5, 2021: Pentecost 15

Click here for Today's Readings

15 Pentecost: September 5, 2021

Who is in and who’s out? It’s an uncomfortable, distasteful question. Instinctively, we wish to share everything with those who need and those who ask for it. That is the principle behind the Lord’s table: all who feel called to share in the sacrament of Christ’s presence are welcome. And that is very important, and a good thing.

And yet, let’s be real. In our everyday lives, resources, opportunities, places are limited, and not everyone who wishes for the best can have it. Not everyone can go to the best school or university; not everyone can have the best and most rewarding job. (I have just been asked to recommend three colleagues or students for the same job opportunity at a famous theological seminary; at best only one can get the position.) We may, and indeed should, wish that opportunities were more equally and fairly shared, that there should be greater equity between one school and another, or that the rewards for different kinds of work were not so excessively different. But even in the best imaginable society, choices will end up being made: this person has more gifts in this area, this person is more motivated or better qualified. The vital thing is that the choices are made honestly and fairly, and by the appropriate standards.

Then there are the other kinds of ins and outs: those created by human weakness, fallenness, prejudice and sin. Those with privilege tend to gravitate towards those who are like them, and to disdain those who are “not like us”. If you wish to see how deeply rooted that way of thinking is, consider our Epistle reading for today. The author is traditionally supposed to have been James, known as “the Lord’s brother” (Galatians 1:19). In Acts, and the traditions which grew up afterwards, James is presented as the leader of the Church in Jerusalem. If he was indeed the author of the epistle that bears his name, he found himself leading a community where all were not as equally welcome as they should have been. The wealthy and attractive in the world’s eyes were looked on with extra favour, and James saw how wrong this was. Our Scripture constantly reminds us that, from the very beginning, the Church is made up of saints, who also make mistakes and need to be reminded of their calling.

So, there are the choices that we have to make (but by appropriate standards) and the choices that we definitely ought never to make, because they are made for all the wrong reasons. It may seem a strange question to ask, but where does Jesus’s behaviour in our Gospel fall along that scale?

In Mark’s Gospel the story of Jesus and the woman at Tyre is told with typically blunt and economical turns of phrase. Matthew (15:21-8) who also tells the same story, has Jesus respond at first that “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel”. The message of salvation, symbolized by the power of healing, is for God’s special people.

The historic faith of the people of Israel was that they were chosen by God, and preserved by God despite all the times when they fell short of God’s standards for them, not just in terms of worship but also in terms of treating each other with equity and care. God loved them and wished to care for them.

It is not at all improbable that Jesus, raised in a devoutly Jewish community, would have thought in the same way. But we must always remember that the Gospels are not verbatim witness accounts. The Gospel narratives are stories told from the perspective of the evangelists and their readers and hearers. This is what happened to get us to where we are now.

By the time that Mark, let alone Matthew, was written, the followers of Jesus had long since recognized that God’s revealed will was to call not just the historic people of God, but the outsiders, the pagans, to the faith as well. James himself, a dedicated exponent of the Jewish wisdom tradition, had been at the heart of that controversy and had reconciled himself to Paul’s calling Gentile believers.

So, let’s look again at this Gospel in that light. Jesus has gone to the lands of Tyre and Sidon, part of historic Phoenicia, present-day Lebanon. Mark suggests that he wanted to “get away from it all”. Yet here he was, among the unbelievers, and it is hard to imagine that he really expected to pass unnoticed. Tyre had a relationship with Israel. King Hiram, according to the Books of Kings, provided materials for the Temple. Elijah stayed with a woman of Sidon at Zarephath. The Tyrians were good neighbours.

Preachers have agonized down the centuries about Jesus’s apparently brutal words that “the children’s food should not be given to the dogs”. Yet there is something odd about the language and the image here. In the original Greek, the word for dogs is “kunaria”, the diminutive form of the word: it means puppies, lapdogs, even “doggies”. “Kunaria” are the little dogs that live in people’s homes and are cared for by them. People who have grown up in rural areas know well how the family dogs come to the table for scraps and are indulged.

Let’s say that this is what Mark meant. I’m still not especially comfortable with treating one group of people as the beloved children of God, and the rest, the outsiders, as their family pets. But Mark is representing a process of transition here. Those who have before this time been regarded as utter outsiders are now becoming part of the household of God. In reality, they were always part of God’s beloved creation, but now the people of God are starting to recognize that fact.

For the prophets of ancient Israel had again and again expressed the vision that all the peoples of the world would be drawn towards their faith and their God. The followers of Jesus believed that this was happening in their own time.

In the second part of our Gospel, Jesus travels across the very north of present-day Israel to a region East of the Sea of Galilee, called the Decapolis, which in Greek means “ten towns”. This region was probably (though not certainly) mostly pagan. In a rather primitive and very tactile story, Jesus makes it possible for one who cannot hear, and who (maybe for that reason) cannot speak properly, to hear and communicate effectively. Jesus, the story tells us, is opening channels of communication with people who have not been able to hear the message of God before.

Every Christian community has to find its balance between two things which are in themselves good things. First, it is right that we build communities of mutual love, care and support. The entire heritage of the Gospel and Epistles of John is focused on the need to build such communities. We show the Gospel at work by loving one another.

However, the kingdom of God and the Church of God are always in motion. We form community in order to expand beyond ourselves. “Outreach”, that overused word in church life, means literally that our arms are not folded, clasped together to hold ourselves safe, but extended, opened out both to offer support, and to welcome others in.

The task of reaching out and welcoming those in need is not only a work for the Church. Whole societies, whole countries, need to become more open to receive with care and equity the refugee, the victim of misgovernment or persecution. I suspect that the events of last week in Afghanistan will have made even those who express loud opinions on everything, recognize that this country owes refuge and support to those who would otherwise suffer, lose liberty or even life, because of helping our forces over the past 20 years. But how long that feeling will last, how capricious the care for the refugee will become, remains to be seen.

In the meantime, it is for us, the followers of Jesus, to extend open and welcoming arms to all those whom we encounter – and to show equal if not greater love and welcome to those who are “not like us”. All are alike in the love of God.

Submitted by the Reverend Doctor Euan Cameron

August 29, 2021: Pentecost 14

Click here for Today's Readings

14 PENTECOST August 22, 2021

When I or my brothers and sisters brought new friends home my father usually engaged them in conversation. He would ask about their family, school, interests, and then skillfully raise the issue about where they went to Church. It didn’t matter where, but whether they belonged to a place of worship. If they did, they passed the test my father would leave us alone.

I have come to learn that my father’s measure for suitable companions was not accurate. Religion was not necessarily a sign of virtue. Today, media sources are focused on events in Afghanistan. America’s longest war is not ending gracefully. One of the main fears is based on the role religion will play in society. Islamic Law, known as Sharia, is to be established as the law of the land. It is a religious code that has serious restrictions on women as well as other freedoms of modern culture. Religion, it is feared, will be used to oppress people.

That is not new. When we read the Gospel, we see that Jesus had the greatest difficulty with people who were religious. Today, we meet leaders who used religion to enforce rules and regulations, establish laws and customs that, as Jesus said, “taught human precepts as doctrine, honored God with their lips but their hearts were far from God.

In our opening prayer this morning we asked God to “Graft in our hearts the love of your Name; increase in us true religion..” What is true religion? The Jewish theologian and philosopher, Abraham Heschel has said: “True religion begins with the awareness that something is asked of us.”

Moses is doing just that in our first reading today. He is giving a long sermon to the Israelites as they prepare to enter the Land of Promise. He recalls what God has done for them these past 40 years of hardship and danger. He reminds them of the Law, Torah, the Covenant which established a relationship with God and with one another. We will see that many times the community forgot that the relationship with God and one another was the main thing. Forgot that the most important thing asked of them was that they do justice, love compassion, and walk humbly with their God; that we have an active concern for the well-being of one another. The rules and regulations, customs and practices must support this, not replace it.

These past weeks our Gospel reading has come from John chapter 6. In what is called the Bread of Life Discourse, Jesus has spoken of himself and what is revealed in his teaching and actions as “bread of life, bread come down from heaven, living bread. Jesus goes so far as to say his flesh is this very bread, nurturing us to eternal life.

In this chapter Jesus tells us who he is: the word come down from heaven, the only One who has “seen the Father”, that he and the Father are One. Jesus also says who we are: those in whom the Father dwells, because of our relationship with Jesus. Wonderful gift, profound challenge.

The Divine Being dwells in you and me, but also in all others. There’s the rub. There’s the challenge. To see the Divine in others is what is asked of us at the heart of our faith. At our baptism we vowed to seek and serve Christ in all people, love our neighbor as ourselves, and respect the dignity of every human being.

58 years ago, yesterday, a Black man stood on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C. and said “I have a dream”. Words very familiar to every American. Words that are, to a great extent, still a dream...

I think words from another speech of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. may be more appropriate to remember today.

Dr. King’s Letter from Birmingham Jail was written in 1963 in response to a letter from 8 Birmingham clergy, including the Episcopal Bishop of Alabama, criticizing Martin Luther King and other civil rights organizers then in jail for marching without a permit. The clergy condemned racism and segregation but preferred slow progress rather than organized resistance.

Dr. King wrote a letter from jail and it was also published in newspapers. In it he explains what non-violent direct action is and why segregation must be confronted now. Toward the end of this letter, he wrote”:

I have been so greatly disappointed with the white church and its leadership. Of course, there are some notable exceptions…But despite these notable exceptions, I must honestly relate that I have been disappointed in the church. I do not say this as one of those negative critics who can always find something wrong with the church. I say this as a minister of the Gospel, who loves the church, who was nurtured in its bosom; who has been sustained by its spiritual blessings and who will remain true to it as long as the cord of life shall lengthen.

When I was suddenly catapulted into the leadership of the bus protest in Montgomery…I felt we would be supported by the white church. I felt that the white ministers, priest and rabbis of the South would be among our strongest allies. Instead, some have been outright opponents, refusing to understand the freedom movement and misrepresenting its leaders; all too many others have been more cautious than courageous and have remained silent behind the anesthetizing security of stained-glass windows.”

Much has changed in 58 years; much remains the same. Often, the church still honors Jesus with lips, but hearts are far from Jesus. Often, the church today teaches human precepts as doctrines, abandons the commandments of God and holds to human traditions. Often the church forgets to do justice, love compassion and walk humbly with our God.

The words of the Gospel we read are not history, not only addressed to Jewish leaders of Israel but to the Christian leaders and members of the body of Christ, today. Something is asked of US. WE are fed with the bread from heaven, the bread of life, bread that is flesh, a symbol of God’s presence with us, in us. Today, we are called to hear the word of God and do it.

-Brendan McCormick

August 15, 2021: Pentecost 12

Click here for Today's Readings

12 Pentecost: August 15, 2021


“Those who eat my flesh and drink my blood abide in me, and I in them”.


In today’s Gospel passage we continue the “bread of life discourses” which form the core of this month’s readings. However, each week has its own particular emphasis, as well as developing the continuing theme.


According to John’s Gospel, here Jesus makes his description of himself as the “bread of life” both more precise, and in a sense, rather darker.


After repeating the expression “I am the living bread that came down from heaven. Whoever eats of this bread will live for ever”, Jesus is reported to have added that “the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh”. Not just “living bread” like manna, but a bread which represents flesh, given to be broken for the world’s sake.


In case we did not get the full point, Jesus adds that “unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. Those who eat my flesh and drink my blood have eternal life”.


If those words had actually been spoken by Jesus in Galilee in the early stages of his ministry, they would have been both bewildering and, to many of the traditional Jewish faith which Jesus and his followers all shared, gratuitously offensive.


Jesus and the disciples would have been aware of how many times (66 in all) the word “blood” appears in the book of Leviticus. The gist of these passages was that the blood of sacrificial animals was to be sprinkled ritually against all the sides of the altar. Leviticus 7 contains strict instructions that neither the fat nor the blood of an animal may be consumed:


“26You must not eat any blood whatever, either of bird or of animal, in any of your settlements. 27Any one of you who eats any blood shall be cut off from your kin.” The same point is made, just as emphatically, ten chapters later on at chapter 17, verses 10-12. Blood represented life, and for that reason was sacred, and might not be consumed.


As Brendan explained to us last week, this part of John’s Gospel emerges from a painful age, in which the followers of Jesus who held to their Jewish faith were being more and more excluded from the transformed Judaism that emerged from the destruction of the temple. If today’s Gospel passage speaks of offense, that is, sadly, part of the point.


I had to make that point distressingly obvious, to counter our Christian tendency to hear these passages about the flesh and blood of Christ and to say “of course, we know that”. Many commentators on this passage have assumed, and I believe rightly, that we have here a reference to the Eucharist, to the sacrament of the body and blood of Christ which we are gathered today to celebrate.


In the days when interpreters of Scripture tended to be more literal-minded, and to assume that Jesus’s precise words were recorded in the Gospels, what was reported from Galilee had of course to be a “foreshadowing” of the Eucharist. At this point we are still many chapters away from the Last Supper and the Passion. Jesus’s body was not yet broken, his blood not poured out, the Eucharist was not yet instituted.


As I suggested two weeks ago, we should not be too perturbed by the thought that these are not the exact words that Jesus spoke: they rather express how the early community of followers, which generated John’s Gospel, remembered his teaching and his meaning. We know from Paul, writing in I Corinthians, that the practice of celebrating the Eucharist was already established in many communities of followers of Jesus by the 50s, maybe as much as a half-century before John’s Gospel was compiled.


It is curious, though, that John’s is the only Gospel which does not include any reference to the blessing of bread and wine in the Last Supper; there is nothing like an institution of the Communion. It is in this passage, not later, that John invokes the memory of the Eucharist.


This passage is a recollection – not a verbatim record – and it was written down against the background of what became the familiar Eucharistic practice of the early communities. For them as for us, the sharing of bread and wine, blessed and offered, was a vital sign of membership and sharing in the life of the community of the risen Christ.


All the same, Jesus is reported as using intentionally graphic language to shock his hearers. Equally, Jesus clearly does not mean his words to be taken literally. It is “the Jews”, John’s sloppy verbal shorthand for those of the Jewish faith who rejected Jesus as Messiah, who try to understand his words literally, and are offended by them.


A few verses later, having given offence, Jesus reportedly said “It is the spirit that gives life; the flesh is useless. The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life.”

In other words, the Gospel writer intended us to interpret the words spiritually and symbolically.


Here is where our Gospel begins to say something both interesting and important. What I wish us to focus upon here are Jesus’s words where he says “Those who eat my flesh and drink my blood abide in me, and I in them”. Two things are crucially important in John’s Gospel:


  • First, John constantly emphasizes Jesus’s oneness with the Father, his coeternity, his divinity, with a level of emphasis and frequency that exceeds all the other evangelists.

  • But also, John stresses Jesus’s oneness with his followers, and his promise that those who believe in him can “abide” in him.


Usually, one would think of these two things as two sides of a coin, maybe two entirely different coins: Jesus as divine, and Jesus as the accessible human being who was and is one with his friends. Yet John is insisting that both these things belong equally together.


That insight, that teaching has some very important consequences.


First, since we have an utter closeness to Jesus, and Jesus has the same utter closeness to God, then the fullness of the Godhead is almost ridiculously accessible and close to us, at all times and in all places. If we find ourselves praying to God with an almost casual familiarity, taking God’s closeness to us for granted, let us not be embarrassed. That is exactly what the Gospels are teaching us to believe we may do, through Jesus.


Secondly, if “we” have that kind of relationship with God, then so does everyone else. In our relationship with God, we are therefore necessarily bound in the same bond of closeness with every other created person.


And there are no exceptions to that: there are no barriers of race, gender, sexuality, or even faith. John probably wrote for a close-knit and maybe embattled community, but his perception of the meaning of Jesus irresistibly calls us to include everyone. That is the logic of the message of John’s Gospel, whether the evangelist or his readers realized it at the time or not.


Let’s reflect some more about the Eucharist. Jesus cannot be saying that only those who literally consume his body and blood in the form of bread and wine can be saved. If so, that would exclude many Christians of less sacramental traditions, not to mention other believers.


Jesus is saying that those who share spiritual communion, which includes but is not confined to the symbolic act of the Eucharist, are as close to him and to each other as can be imagined.


For that reason, we need have no fear that we were separated from God as we went without the physical Eucharist for months of the pandemic; nor because we are unable to share the sacramental blood of Christ just yet, until the public health messages improve.


On the contrary, we are grateful for the enormously helpful strengthening of faith which we draw weekly from our act of communion. But let us understand it as it is meant to be understood: as a spiritual act, one which strengthens the bonds that bind us, not just to those we see and know, but to all those whom God loves.

Submitted by the Reverend Doctor Euan Cameron


August 8, 2021: Pentecost 11

Click here for Today's Readings

11 PENTECOST August 8, 2021

Holy Women, Holy Men, is a book that lists people revered in the Episcopal Church as models who lived the values of the Gospel. Tomorrow, Edith Stein is remembered on the anniversary of her death in 1942. Born a German Jew in 1898 on the feast of Yam Kippur, the most sacred feast of the Jewish faith, Edith was a brilliant scholar who became a respected philosopher. In the 1930’s she converted to Roman Catholicism and became a Carmelite Nun.

As Hitler rose to power in Germany, the Carmelite community sent Edith to a monastery in Holland, thinking she would be protected from the anti-Semitic persecution that was growing in Nazi Germany. However, after the Nazi invasion of Holland, Edith was arrested and sent to Auschwitz where she, a Roman Catholic Nun, born and proud of her Jewish roots died in the gas chamber because she was Jewish.

In 1998, Pope John Paul II proclaimed Edith a saint in the Roman Catholic Church. It was an action that created controversy. After all, Edith Stein was killed because she was a Jew, not because she was a Roman Catholic. Also, the Christian Church has been an incubator of anti-Semitism for centuries. Down through the ages, writers, leaders and clergy of Christian Churches have written and spoken many words condemning Jews and the Jewish faith.

The beginnings can be seen in today’s Gospel. We read, “the Jews began to complain about Jesus because he said, “I am the bread that came down from heaven”. “The Jews” is used over 70 times in John’s Gospel, always referring to those who rejected Jesus. Of course, the writer using the phrase was most likely a Jew, as were all the apostles, and the most of Jesus’ followers in his lifetime. As was Jesus himself.

The Gospel we read today was written about 60 years after the events recorded. Things had changed. The Jewish faith was in a dire situation. In 70 A.D., the city of Jerusalem and temple were destroyed by the Roman Army, putting down a failed revolt by the Jewish people. Many of the priests had been killed. The center and form of worship was gone, and people relied on the rabbis and synagogues to survive. Threatened institutions become more restrictive and the Jewish faith became less tolerant of fringe religious expressions. Jews who proclaimed that messiah had come were no longer considered legitimate expressions of the faith.

Hence, Christian Jews were now expelled from synagogues. Families were divided, people cut off from the roots of their faith and heritage. For Jewish Christians at the end of the 1st century, the Jewish leaders appeared to be rejecting Jesus. And in rejecting Jesus, John’s Gospel says, they were rejecting the God handed down through Abraham, Moses and the prophets.

In the Gospel we are reading these weeks Jesus proclaims a special relationship with God. He is the bread that came down from heaven; the one who is from God; the God that no one has seen except the one (himself) who has come from the father; he is bread from heaven, living bread; bread that is his very flesh”. This is challenging, even to us. To many who heard him it was heresy. They knew where he came from, who his parents were. What is this talk of coming down from heaven? It even sounds like he is saying he is equal to God. So now are there two gods? What challenged “the Jews” of Jesus’ day, had challenged the Church down through the ages. It challenges us today.

But, today, let us go back to the use of “the Jews” as a title for those who reject Jesus. From the days of the Gospel there have been many Christians who have disparaged, ridiculed and even condemned Jews. For 2000 years leaders of the Christian faith have added to the evil of anti-Semitism that has infected society. One could argue that the Christian Church has been an incubator for anti-Semitism. At times this has exploded into public policy and behavior, laws and culminating, in our lifetime, with the murder of 6 million Jews. The evil is with us today.

Last year there were over 2000 reported anti-Semitic incidents of assault, vandalism and harassment in the United States. The time has passed when we can stand silent when we witness words, stories or actions of anti-Semitism. As the Jewish theologian Abraham Heschel has said, “Few are guilty, but all are responsible”. We may not do the acts or the words. But must respond, we must condemn. True, there are other forms of injustice, racism and oppression. But today, as we must, we speak of anti-Semitism.

In our first reading from scripture, we follow Elijah fleeing for his life, hiding out in the wilderness. A powerful prophet, he is a wanted man by the king. There is a price on his head. He sees himself a failure and asks to die. But God’s response is to send Angels to feed and encourage Elijah. Of course, the reason this reading is assigned today is that bread that fortified Elijah to travel 40 days. Great stuff, but no comparison to the bread come down from heaven, the very power and presence of Jesus that fortifies us with everlasting life.

But there is more. Elijah finally comes to Mt. Horeb where his spirits will be renewed, where he encounters the very presence of God. Mt. Horeb is also called Mt Sinai. It is here that the Carmelite community was first established in the 13th century. It is this community that Edith Stein joined 2600 years after Elijah arrived. Both, born into the Jewish faith, are connected by and encounter with the very presence of God. Both have been nurtured by bread from heaven. As we gather to receive this same bread, may we be empowered to proclaim the same God who embraced this Holy woman and Holy Man.


August 1, 2021: Pentecost 10

Click here for Today's Readings

10 Pentecost: August 1, 2021


John 6:27 Labour not for the meat which perisheth”


Over the next few weeks our lectionary readings will guide us through one of the most important, and one of the most controversial, chapters in the Gospel according to John. These readings are sometimes called the “Bread of Life discourses”. They contain much that is beautiful and inspiring. They also testify to the very difficult, sometimes conflicted atmosphere in which the fourth Gospel was written. Those people who followed Jesus from the foundation of their Jewish faith were increasingly being set apart from, and sometimes driven out of, the community of the synagogues where Jesus himself had taught.


One needs here to address something very important about the fourth Gospel, which some people may find challenging. The view of most scholars who study the scriptures is that the words attributed to Jesus in John’s Gospel were almost certainly not the exact words which Jesus spoke. Certain phrases within John’s Gospel do indeed reflect how Jesus’s own words were remembered; but many other expressions speak rather to the way that Jesus’s meaning was interpreted, and understood, among those who cherished his memory and his message in the 60-70 years after Jesus’s earthly ministry.


So, when we refer to something that “Jesus said” in this Gospel, we should keep in mind that what we are hearing and reading is the memory of Jesus’s teaching, filtered through the particular beliefs and community life of those who most cherished that memory.


This Gospel passage follows directly after the feeding of the five thousand and the walking on the water, two linked stories which appear to have been a coherent and widely-recalled tradition in all the Gospels. As I mentioned two weeks ago, Mark and John both report these two stories in very much the same way.


Between last week’s reading and this week’s, a handful of verses are omitted: these pose the dramatic puzzle that Jesus fed the people on, probably, the east side of the Sea of Galilee, and since he did not join the apostles in the boat when they left the shore, those who were seeking him out did not understand how he managed to get across the lake to Capernaum so quickly …


Their curiosity about his movements prompts Jesus to respond, with just a hint of gentle sarcasm, that the people were mostly following him because of the free food, and they should have a better reason …


Over twenty years ago, British television broadcast a much-loved situation comedy called The Vicar of Dibley, which featured the comic struggles of a woman priest (at that time a novelty in the Church of England) to minister to and care for the lovably weird people of an unbearably quaint English village. In one scene, the vicar met with some schoolchildren, and was asked what Jesus had achieved. Geraldine the vicar explained that Jesus raised Lazarus from the dead: to which a child said, if he could do that once, why didn’t he raise lots of other people as well?

The question, and the vicar’s resulting embarrassment, were of course for comic effect. But the question is a real one. And similarly, one might say, well why did Jesus not continuously feed the hungry? Why did he not end all the hunger in the world?


Part of the answer, of course, is that we human beings can do that: as a society and a culture, we have it in our power to feed all those who need it. We just need to value that sufficiently to make sure that it happens.


Food is vitally important, and it is especially important that those of us who are secure in an abundance of food should be mindful of, and give practical support to those who are not. And yet, in multiple places in the New Testament, Jesus is reported as saying that concern about food, and about other aspects of our physical well-being, should not be our primary concern; that God knows our needs, and intends to provide for them, or intends that we provide for them ourselves.


Our Gospel passage refers to the gift of manna in the wilderness, quoting the passage from Psalm 78 that we heard read earlier. All Jewish believers would (or should) have known that, from the moment that God brought people into the promised land and gave them a harvest, the gift of manna ceased. In Joshua 5:11-12 it reads: “11On the day after the passover, on that very day, they ate the produce of the land, unleavened cakes and parched grain. 12The manna ceased on the day they ate the produce of the land, and the Israelites no longer had manna; they ate the crops of the land of Canaan that year.”


So, we have a bit of a puzzle. Jesus’s concern for the poor and the hungry was absolute; yet he is consistently quoted as saying that other things are more important than satisfying material needs.


Part of the key to the puzzle may lie in one word that Jesus is reported as using:


27Do not work for the food that perishes, but for the food that endures for eternal life, which the Son of Man will give you.”


The word translated “work” in the NRSV is translated “labour” in the KJV (a rare case where maybe the older translation is more convincing). It is a Greek word which means to devote energy to, to focus one’s concern upon, to make one’s primary objective, perhaps.


A few lines later, the people ask Jesus, using exactly the same word, which in this case is translated as ‘What must we do to perform the works of God?’ Our translations obscure the fact that the word translated “labour” or “work” in one verse, and “perform” in another are actually the same word: the people ask, if “the labour of food” is not to be our primary concern, but “the labour of God” is, then what does the “labour of God” mean, practically speaking?


The point seems to be one’s “work” is something that one struggles for, that one dedicates all one’s effort towards, that one regards as one’s goal in life … and apparently, the people who listened to Jesus got the point, even if our Bible translators maybe didn’t.


So, what do we make our goal in life?


Jesus, as reported in John’s Gospel, replies to the people that ‘This is the work of God, that you believe in him whom he has sent.’ We are urged to make faith in the incarnate Word of God the heart of our life, our primary or ultimate concern …


From that, of course, lots of things can and must follow, including a powerful impulse to help the hungry, the suffering, and the oppressed, and to strive for justice for all people.


But the difference between the progressive person without faith, and the Christian seeking the kingdom, is that our striving comes out of our faith, faith that Jesus has come into the world to give all people abundant life: in bringing fullness of life to others, we “work the work of God”.


And the source of that abundance of energy is expressed in a metaphor, in an image, as the “bread of life”. Jesus clearly did not mean that those who had faith in him would no longer need to eat. But he does seem to have meant that those who embraced him and his message in faith and trust would find their lives transformed, once and for all. Their spiritual hunger and thirst would be satisfied forever.


There seems, later in this chapter, to be an anticipatory reference to the Eucharist. There is of course no doubt that the Eucharist expresses in a special way the sense that Jesus is the bread of life. It is not to be understood, as some devout people in the Middle Ages supposed, that one should try to live with the Eucharist as one’s sole physical nourishment! It is rather that Jesus offers us his presence, in his teaching, in our communion, and in the Spirit, as an inexhaustible resource, forever strengthening us to do his work. And that is more than enough.


Submitted by the Reverend Doctor Euan Cameron

July 25, 2021: Pentecost 9

Click here for Today's Readings

Pentecost 9: July 25, 20121

There is an old story about Leonardo DaVinci. According to the story, he painted his famous Last Supper in great privacy, allowing no one to see it in process. When he finished, he invited a close friend to be the first to view it. The friend gasped as he entered the room and set his eyes on this masterpiece. He uttered “magnificent, marvelous” as he approached the painting. He then focused on the elaborated chalice placed on the table around which Jesus gathered with his disciples. Again, looking at the chalice the friend repeated, “splendid, magnificent.”

When the friend left, Leonardo was disappointed and took his paint and removed the chalice from the painting. Nothing, he hoped, would distract other views from the focus of his work, Jesus sharing his last meal with his friends.

It is a story, of course, but one that can teach us something about our reading in today’s Gospel Story. The multiplication of the loaves and fish is the only miracle recorded in all four Gospel accounts. In fact there are 6 accounts of Jesus feeding a large crowd from a few loaves and fish. It happens twice in Mark and Matthew.

What draws the focus of many is the miraculous appearance of an abundance of bread and fish. Enough to feed 5000 people with plenty left over. What magic, they thought. What came to their minds was the story in our first reading. Elisha, the disciple of Elijah, fed hundreds from twenty loaves. Elijah, many believed, would return to announce the immediate coming of the messiah. In fact, the expression “the prophet who is to come” was a common reference to Elijah.

But the crowd who had eaten much bread in the Gospel story, thought the messiah would be a king who would lead their armies against the Roman occupiers and free Israel. The miracle led them to try to make Jesus that king.

What was Jesus’ response? He ran away.

The crowd was focused on the wrong thing. This work of Jesus is called a sign in the Gospel. Something that opened one to a spiritual reality beyond the material result of the miracle.

The real focus was to be on a very different bread. Bread Jesus can provide because of who he is in relation to God the Father. The God who fed Israel in the desert; who empowered Elijah, is present in Jesus to provide bread for eternal life.

The miracle was a sign pointing to this bread that would not just provide food to satisfy human hunger, preserve human life, but bread that would nurture everlasting life. That is the Eucharistic Bread we share. Bread that is Christ’s presence in the Church, in the community of faith in Jesus.

John’s Gospel asks a lot of the community for which it was written, and this chapter asks a lot from us. We are invited on a journey of faith. In this Gospel faith is a verb, something that must grow and open us to an awareness of who Christ is – the very presence of God with us. This is something we are still learning, still living, still growing in us. For on this journey we are fed with the Bread of Heaven. The Bread, the very presence of Jesus, the eternally begotten Son of God.

What follows today’s reading, is a long chapter (6) called the Bread of Life Discourse’ which is a reflection, even an interpretation of this mystery at the heart of our faith. So come in the following weeks and let us reflect together.

In the meantime, we gather to be fed by this Living bread from heaven. We are nurtured by the very presence, the loving presence of Christ. In this time of pandemic we have gathered for Morning Prayer but have returned to Holy Eucharist. With some changes. We share bread but not the common cup. We are following directives from health experts. Today, we will add the cup of wine but only the celebrant will receive at this time. We are moving, but with necessary caution. But let us not lose focus. All of us receive the same Heavenly Bread. All of us nurtured by the presence of Christ. All of us embraced by the living God.



July 18, 2021: Pentecost 8


Click here for Today's Readings


8 PENTECOST: July 18, 2021

The Sacredness of the Ordinary

Our Gospel passage for today seems, when you see it in context, like a very strange piece of selection from the Gospel according to Mark. As you will be aware, we are just now in Lectionary year B, when most of our Gospel readings come from Mark, with a few key moments marked, as they are every year, by readings from John.

Mark’s Gospel, generally believed to have been the first written, gives the appearance of artless and everyday style, grammar and language, which conceals much care and thought in its composition. In the first Gospel Mark organized the often-told and remembered stories of the ministry of Jesus, which had taken place some 30-40 years before the Gospel was written down.

Something that Mark does quite often is to wrap one story around another. As we read a few weeks ago, he wraps the two parts of the story of the healing of Jairus’s daughter around the separate story of healing the woman with continuous bleeding.

In today’s Gospel reading, however, the meat in the sandwich has been left out, and what we have are just the two slices of bread (or the wrap, if you prefer). We have Jesus teaching everyone who streamed out to listen to him in Galilee; then, after a break, we have his equally profuse and generous healing of all those who came to see him in vast numbers.

And what a filling in the sandwich has been left out! In the passages omitted from our reading, we would have heard the feeding of the five thousand – the only miracle attested in all four testaments – and Jesus’s appearance to his disciples walking on the Sea of Galilee. Those stories are, of course, told on other days in our lectionary.

What I wish to suggest today is that the wrapping of Mark’s sandwich is of enormous importance, perhaps it is the very essence of the story, as far as Mark is concerned.

It is rather interesting that Mark chapter 6 tells the story of the feeding of the 5000 and, just after that, Jesus’s walking on the water; and that these two stories are also presented in John (also chapter 6) one after another, and in exactly the same order. The best explanation suggested for this similarity is that there was an oral tradition, shared among the various communities of the followers of Jesus, that these two miracles followed one upon the other in that particular order.

So, for the miracles, Mark is probably drawing on a tradition, which retold the stories that everyone remembered: but the surrounding passages, where he sets the scenes for these spectacular stories, the “wrapping” so to speak, may just possibly be more authentically the voice of the evangelist, than the miracle stories which he learned from others.

Let’s just suppose that Mark was saying something like this: the regular day-by-day mission of Jesus (extraordinary for anyone else but ordinary for him) was teaching and healing. The astonishing, miraculous things that Jesus did were called forth by the circumstances where he found himself. Jesus could not help himself from doing deeds of power to help others; but maybe, just maybe the miracles were not the most important parts of his message. Is Mark, at least implicitly, saying that the everyday, continuing mission of Jesus, of being with the people in love and care, and teaching them the ways of God for themselves and for others, was really more sacred than the miracles?

Hold that thought a moment, while we consider our other readings for today.

Jeremiah was a prophet for an age of desperate crisis. The vital role of the leader, the anointed king who stood in God’s place, was to pastor and to care for the people. In this poetic reading, Jeremiah offers a lyrical passage about good pastoral rulership. Such an ideal was not reflected in the reality of the time that Jeremiah’s prophecies were compiled. In his days the kingdom of Judah was under repeated attack from the Babylonians. The claimants to royal status within the kingdom were humiliated or killed, or both, in rapid succession. In this time of chaos and despair, Jeremiah proclaimed that it was God alone who would, in the fullness of time, establish a new kingship, which would bring peace, order and protection for the people.

It never happened, at least not in that sense. Judaea would exist precariously under the rule of foreign dynasties for the next five centuries and be overwhelmed by Rome. But what Jeremiah offered was a vision of what real care for a people meant: not self-glorification, not oppression of the weak, not hostility to the outsider, but wise dealing, bringing comfort and stability to the people. It’s still a valid vision of good government, which far too many rulers around the world completely fail to acknowledge.

And in the letter to the Ephesians, we learn just who “God’s people” are to be. They are no longer to be divided into the people of the covenant and those outside. All are to be brought together into one universal body, as the love of God is universal and includes all.

God wishes the great all-embracing mass of God’s people to be cared for, looked after, in a way that brings peace, security, and flourishing.

In that light, let me return to Mark’s Gospel. Implicitly, as it were in an undertone, maybe Mark is suggesting that the ordinary business of life, which for Jesus meant being among the people, teaching and healing, was and is more sacred than the moments of special celebration or exaltation.

Here’s a thought: I wonder how many of us still watch award ceremonies on television? If the concern sometimes expressed about declining audience figures is anything to go by, it seems that not many of us do. And there is always something a little absurd about treating an awards event as a piece of entertainment in itself.

Those who receive Oscars, Golden Globes or Emmys earn them by telling stories through their work, and telling those stories well. One believes – one hopes – that what gives satisfaction to a creative artist of any kind is doing the work of creating, rather than being given accolades for doing it. It’s only by being a dedicated creative person that one earns awards in the first place.

The special, spectacular event is froth on the top of the dessert: it is not, so to speak, the substantial nourishment that comes from doing what one loves to do.

The everyday can, in fact, be more special than the spectacular.

How do those insights speak to our lives in the Christian community? Well, every Sunday we participate in something undoubtedly very special. It is something that previous generations of Christians at one time even regarded as miraculous. It is when we celebrate the presence of Christ among us in the form of the bread and wine which he blessed at the last Supper, and which his followers remembered, and learned to bless in his name.

This is a profoundly special thing, but it gains its value, certainly for those in our tradition, by being inseparably linked to the teaching of the Word of God. Teaching and prayer precede the Eucharist and help to give it its sacredness. To celebrate the sacrament without also surrounding it with reading God’s Word, teaching, reflection and prayer would be to deprive the sacrament of what makes it not only holy, but also powerful.

And then, strengthened and nourished by it, we take the insights which come from our shared worship into everyday life. If we are mindful of what we are doing, every day becomes a living out of the message that we have received and reminded ourselves of every Sunday.

Without doubt, we need to engage with the extraordinary holiness and sacredness which comes with the signs of God’s presence with us and within us. But the real reason for that experience of the sacred is to strengthen us for the ministries which we share, by living and doing our work in our communities of friends and colleagues through the week. Sacredness is, by a wonderful surprise, profoundly infectious. It spreads itself throughout the rest of life. And blessedly, we need no vaccine to protect us from its infecting power. It can do nothing but good, for us and for all whose lives we touch.

Submitted by the Reverend Doctor Euan Cameron

July 11, 2021: Pentecost 7


Click here for Today's Readings


7 PENTECOST: July 11, 2021

Cicero, the Roman philosopher, statesman, orator and challenge to every sophomore Latin student, said that the gods of Rome were careful about great things, but neglected the small things. Our God, however, is concerned with the many intimate details in human life. In fact, the Hebrew and Christian scriptures only speak of God in relationship to human beings.

Our God is focused on us. Creates a world for us to inhabit, makes a Covenant with us so we can agree on what is expected of us and what we can expect from God. Gives a law for daily life, sends prophets to remind us of the Law; lists the punishment when we break it, and offers hope when punishment comes. God just can’t leave us alone.

Amos found this out. Today we read that he happens upon God the Builder. God has a plumb line and is checking to see if Israel’s actions are building a strait relationship with God and one another. As we have all learned these recent days, there are rules for constructing buildings and if not done right, disaster will result. The same is true for our relationship with God and one another.

We also meet Herod today and learn he liked to listen to the prophet John the Baptist even though John was warning Herod of his sin. Obviously, Herod listened but did not hear and he has the prophet murdered lest he look weak to friends.

Of course, Mark tells this story to prepare us for the crime that will be committed against Jesus. Again, by a leader that did not want to look weak. Also, Mark teaches us that God so loved the world that the Son was sent to reveal a love without limit and without end. If the human family had been paying attention, we might have suspected this. After all that is the kind of God we have

We are reminded of this in the other reading that is part of our worship, the letter to the Ephesians. Again, the focus of the reading is on the relationship between God and the human family. I want to go back to the verse that comes just before where our reading begins today. The writer greets the community: “Grace be to you and Peace of God our Father…” “Grace and peace” are the greeting Paul often uses. The words in Hebrew would be familiar to a Jewish audience. In the Hebrew Scriptures these are the two words most often used to describe who God is and how God acts. They can be translated as “enduring love” and “faithful, lasting, true”. Over 248 times in the Hebrew scriptures God is presented as enduring, steadfast lover and faithful, true one. They come from the same words, today’s Psalm translates as “Mercy and truth”.

God is the faithful, steadfast lover whose gift, that is grace, has the power to transform us. What we can be is described to the Ephesians: “blessed with every spiritual blessing; chosen by God from before the world was created; holy and blameless; destined for adoption; redeemed; forgiven; taught the mystery of God’s love; inheritors of all that is good; empowered to hope; marked with the seal of the Spirit; one of God’s own people.” All by the grace of God.

The Letter to the Ephesians has been called the “Epistle of Grace”. The words appear 12 times and this amazing grace has the power to transform us to be the people God created us to be.

What is our response to this God who is so focused on us, so extravagant in grace? The Jewish theologian, Abraham Heschel has said: The only fitting response to the surprise of living is gratitude. And gratitude is at the heart of all our prayer. A second response is that we look at one another as gifts of God. Today, the Church celebrates the feast of Benedict of Nursia. In his rule for monks, he mentions that monks who live in community may not be the most heroic, but for most of us community is a necessary support if we are to live the life of the Gospel.

So, God, who pays attention to every detail, has given us to each other and with one another we prayed at the beginning of this service: O Lord, mercifully receive the prayers of your people who call upon you, and grant that we may know and understand what things we ought to do, and also may have the grace and power faithfully to accomplish them.

We know that God is the enduring, faithful lover whose grace is everywhere and abundant. God has answered our prayer. Let us support one another as we live out our answer.


July 4, 2021: Pentecost 6


Click here for Today's Readings


6 PENTECOST: July 4, 2021

If you have been around town these days, most likely you have seen signs “Now hiring”, Help Wanted”. One of the jobs that has openings but is not advertised is “Prophet”. Matthew’s Gospel promises all prophets will receive a prophet’s reward. However, in today’s Gospel reading, Jesus indicates that may not be so great. “A prophet is not without honor except in his/her own town and among their own kin and in their own house. You have to read the fine print.

Even more, if we look at some prophets, we see the reward is often ridicule, oppression and sometimes death. In our first reading, God tells Ezekiel he is being sent to an impudent and stubborn people, a rebellious house. Not an audience that would give great rewards.

Paul, has listed the many indignities visited upon him as his reward for being a prophet.

Why? Well, Prophets can be difficult and what they say can offend. A prophet does not “fore tell” the future, but rather “tell forth” God’s reaction, God’s opinion, about events and actions of people. Prophets are “the conscience of a nation”, as one writer says, and what they have to say is often strong disapproval.

One prophet who learned this was Amos, who we will meet in next week's readings. He lived 750 years before Jesus and some of his famous words are known to many of us: “Let justice roll down like a river and righteousness like a never-failing stream” (Amos 5:24). Favorite words of Dr. Martin Luther King.

I was greeted by words of Amos the day I arrived at my last Parish, 36 years ago. I found on my desk a book titled “A History of Wallingford”, the town in which I was to serve. There was a marker in the book and I opened it and read the page.

It was a story of the Reverend Samuel Andrews, the Anglican missionary that had established the parish 245 years before. He was described as a hardy priest who established 3 other parishes in the area. A man of prominence, he was invited to give the invocation at the town’s first July 4th celebration. He used as his scripture reading verses that come just before Dr. King’ favorite words in Amos: “The Lord says, I hate and despise your festivals, and I will not be pleased by your solemn assemblies.” (Amos 5:22)

Reverend Andrews then pointed out the Declaration of Independence declared “all men are created equal and endowed with inalienable rights”. He went on to point out the slaves of the assembled good people, who were out of the shade, sweating in the hot sun, caring for the horses of the assembled gentry. Not all men were created equal. What else he may have said was not recorded.

Both Amos and Reverend Andrews suffered a similar fate, A few chapters after these words of Amos, he was told by the king to “Get out, go home”, and a short time after his invocation, Reverend Andrews was asked to leave Wallingford.

In our day we are a Nation still in conflict over the fact that the high ideals upon which our Nation is built have not always been lived. Even the men who wrote and signed this declaration owned slaves. Not to mention the fact that women were excluded from these inalienable rights.

On this fourth of July, we are well aware that we fall short of living out our Nation’s creed. Unfortunately, reminding us of our failings is considered by some a greater evil than the failings themselves.

Jeremiah, another prophet who met much resistance, even persecution from his fellow Israelites, wondered if a nation can repent, change its ways. He feared it could not. But at another time in the history of this Nation, a time of even greater stress than we know, a newly re-elected President Lincoln. As the bloodiest and most divisive of our nation’s wars was ending. Lincoln concluded his second inauguration speech with these words:

‘With malice toward none and charity toward all; with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive to finish the work we are in; to bind up the nations wounds….to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations”.

Today, we are called again to strive for the lofty goals proclaimed at the foundation of this Nation – “to bind up the Nations wounds, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.”


June 27, 2021: Pentecost 5

Click here for Today's Readings

6 PENTECOST: June 27, 2021

There have been reports these past weeks about Holy Eucharist (Holy Communion) as Roman Catholic Bishops discuss the possibility of denying Holy Communion to elected leaders who support Abortion rights for women. That issue is part of a greater concern in the Church about the understanding of the Eucharist among the faithful. Many articles I read describe Holy Communion as the central action of Roman Catholic worship. However, the “bread and wine” being the “body and blood” of Jesus have a variety of understanding among Catholics. The bishops want to establish unity in belief.

Unity of belief is not present in the community of Christians. If you visited a Congregational or Baptist or a Methodist Church on a Sunday, you would likely not find Holy Communion celebrated. In many Christian Denominations the Word of Scripture would be seen as “central”.

We Episcopalians like to see our worship and belief as balancing Word and Sacrament. Our understanding of the Eucharist is more nuanced than the Roman Catholic appears and many of us have been disinvited from receiving Holy Communion at a Roman Catholic Mass. Holy Communion, we are told is a sign of union. The Episcopal Church, on the other hand invites the baptized to receive; seeing Holy Communion as nurturing this union.

In these months of “Zoom Worship”, Morning Prayer has kept us together. But gathering together around the table of the Lord for Holy Communion is our desired way of worship. We prayed in our Opening Prayer: “Almighty God, you have built your Church upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief cornerstone: Grant us so to be joined together in unity of spirit by their teaching. To do so we will need to find a way for all of us to gather together around the table of the Lord.

But there is much other work to do. We are now at the point of our worship the BCP calls the Liturgy of the Word. We have read from 4 Books of our Bible. Bible means “books”, plural and our Bible is really a library of many books. But not all Bibles have the same number of Books. What we call the New Testament, the Christian Scriptures, contains 27 books. It is fair to say that most every Bible would contain those same books. However, the Bibles you have at home may differ in the number of books they have in the Old Testament.

This Bible developed over thousands of years and the final decision as to what would be in it was not made until 1500’s. Martin Luther emphasized scripture as central to our faith and worship. Hence, what was scripture, what was in the Bible, became more important. Rules were established and some books that had been used in worship and prayer were not considered to be within the boundaries of Holy Scripture. 39 books made the cut.

The Roman Catholic response to Luther, the Council of Trent, not only condemned Luther and his teaching but created its own category of scripture and it included some of the books Luther did not. 46 books made the cut. These left out books are sometimes called Apocrypha, and, today, Protestant Bibles often include them at the end of the Bible.

One book Martin Luther left out and was kept in by Rome is our first reading today. The Wisdom of Solomon was certainly not written by Solomon. It was most likely written 900 years after Solomon, and shortly before the birth of Jesus. Scholars think it was written in Egypt and appears to have been written for Jews who lived there among people of a different culture and religion in order to support them in the faith of Israel.

In our short reading, we hear the author re-affirm the goodness of creation which is made by the one Creator God in whose image we are all made. What is new is that for the first time life eternal, life after death, is presented as a blessing. The unity, which we prayed for at the beginning of our worship, our source and future, is already stamped on the human family.

Unity is an issue that concerns Paul in his letter to the church in Corinth. The Christians in Corinth were predominantly Gentile. Paul had come to believe one could be Christian without becoming Jewish, especially not having to be circumcised. The Christian community in Jerusalem was predominantly Jewish Christians. They held to the original idea that one had to be Jewish, just as Jesus was and all the early disciples. This included circumcision. This may seem like a small issue to us but it was of fundamental importance at that time and was the source of considerable disagreement.

Today we hear Paul praising and encouraging the Corinthians to be generous contributing money to be taken to support the Jerusalem Christians who were in need. Donating money to people with whom there is conflict can encourage unity.

Paul would not have used the words, but he was participating in the Jewish practice of “Tikkun Olam”, which means “repairing the world”. Some claim It is a concept that dates back to the time of Jesus that Jews bear responsibility not only for their own well-being but for the well-being of all others throughout the world.

In our Gospel, as we have been following Jesus in his ministry freeing people from the power of evil and healing the sick, we could describe him as working to repair the world. A contemporary prayer among Jews says: “Lord, you have taught us to support the failing, heal the sick, free the captive and comfort all who suffer pain.”

Our baptismal promise to “seek and serve Christ in all people, love our neighbors as ourselves and respect the dignity of every human being”, is participation in the work of “repairing the world”. Such work brings us into that “unity of spirit” for which we prayed. We are called to this unity by the words of scripture, by gathering around the table of the Lord to share bread and wine, by believing in the God in whose image we are all created and whose enduring life is present within is empowering us to participate in “repairing the world”. Amen

June 20, 2021: Pentecost 4

Click here for Today's Readings

June 20, 2021: Pentecost 4


“Who then is this, that even the wind and the sea obey him?”

Well, Mark’s Gospel begins with the proclamation “the good news of Jesus Christ, the Son of God”. From the very beginning of this Gospel, we, the readers, have our answer to the disciples’ question.

And yet consistently, throughout the Gospel, the disciples fail to realize what is in front of them every day; and just as importantly, the religious elite of Jesus’s day grows progressively more and more hostile and willfully uncomprehending. We saw two weeks ago how some of the scribes accused Jesus of expelling demons by the power of a greater demon, a logical absurdity. Last week, in the passage just preceding this text, Jesus taught in parables about the hidden but growing promise of the kingdom.

At the end of this chapter, in our Gospel for today, Jesus is portrayed as commanding the elements of nature, and they obey him. This is quite a difficult message for us to hear. We are accustomed to think of the physical forces of nature as a quasi-mechanical system, even if an unpredictable one that defies our full comprehension. The idea that a human being could by a word of command quell a storm at sea seems highly problematic.

Here we need to remember that, in the age of Jesus and the evangelists, the physical cosmos was not thought to be like some kind of machine. It was believed both to carry meaning, and to work under the direction of the divine power. Some cultures believed that the natural elements were controlled by intelligent spirit-beings.

The Psalms are full of examples of God controlling the elements. Dramatic events in nature demonstrate God’s power over them and through them. As part of Psalm 104 says: “you make the clouds your chariot; you ride on the wings of the wind.You make the winds your messengers, and flames of fire your servants.”

The Song of the Three Young Men, from the additions to Daniel, used from time to time as one of the canticles at morning prayer, sees nothing strange in calling on the cosmic order to express itself in praise of God: “Glorify the Lord, O nights and days, O shining light and enfolding dark. Storm clouds and thunderbolts, glorify the Lord, praise him and highly exalt him for ever.”

So, Mark’s Gospel was making a point here about who, and what, Jesus was. He makes it in an almost comic manner: the disciples panic because of a sudden storm on the sea of Galilee (a lake prone, as the disciples surely knew, to sudden outbreaks of violent weather). Jesus sleeps through it all, until the terrifieddisciples awaken him.

The whole story has a slightly stagey quality; the purpose of the whole account seems to be to show (i) that Jesus bears the same relationship to nature as the creating and sustaining God, and (ii) that his followers are incapable of believing that fact, even when it is forced upon their attention.

In the time of Jesus (and for centuries after) it was credible that the cosmic order was not only created, but sustained by a provident and at times judgmental God. Natural disasters, including floods, storms, earthquakes, and plagues, came as God’s punishment or warnings against sin, or as tests for the endurance of the faithful.

We are now challenged to think of nature in a quite different way. We still can, and should, think of it as the benevolent gift of God who loves to create, who rejoices in the beauty and diversity of nature. Psalm 104, again, speaks of whales thus: “there is that Leviathan, which you have made for the sport of it”. God, evidently, makes things for sheer enjoyment. That is a God to whom I can relate.

However, we also have to acknowledge that the created order is a fragile and beautiful thing, constantly in change, but also vulnerable to the excessive impact that the human race, in all our teeming numbers, has upon it. It is both rash and selfish to assume (as some Christians, sad to say, are willing to say and seem to believe) that our provident God not only creates the universe, but so regulates it that it will be utterly unaffected by whatever stresses, imbalances and pollutants we throw at it.

Most thinking people acknowledge that human beings need to make major adjustments to the ways that we live, work, travel, and feed ourselves, if we are not to cause damage to the global system so severe that it will harm everything, including human life, for centuries. That is something which people can see and agree on, without being Christians, or people of any faith at all. What might our Gospel tell us that is special?

We believe in a God who is profoundly invested in physical nature. The God of Christianity is not a God of abstract ideas or rarefied, disembodied wisdom. We have a God who cared so much about the physical order as a place of moral existence, that our God took human flesh to live in that order, subject to the same frailties and vulnerabilities as all other human beings.

In Jesus Christ, we have a leader and teacher who loves the world of nature, to which human beings belong, and who comes to share in its vulnerability, its fragility and its pain. In the light of the incarnation, the frail vulnerability of creation is what makes it sacred. Christ teaches us that creation is something not just to be appreciated, not just to be lived in, not just to be tended and cared for, though it is all of those things. Creation is there to be loved, with the same profound care and nurture that we hope to offer each other.

Loving creation means more than just appreciating what is beautiful and attractive in itself. There’s nothing wrong with that– as a start. I hope that, in a week or two, we may begin to see Monarch butterflies visit, as they did last year, the forest of milkweed plants growing either side of our garden fence.

But it also means appreciating the invisible complexity of nature – the interwoven and interlinked systems where even the unattractive creatures, the bugs and the rodents, yes, even the viruses, have their place. It means loving what is not obviously lovely or lovable.

Loving what is not in itself lovable is what God does with us, for the sake of Jesus Christ. It is what we are called to do, despite the outward appearances, not just to all humanity, but to all that God made.

It means protecting and supporting the wild places, not regarding them as waste ground, or as empty space waiting for us to exploit them. It can also mean tending and beautifying nature. God, we are told, planted a garden; the risen Jesus in John’s Gospel was taken for a gardener.

It also means loving all people, as a part of God’s creation, not as somehow in opposition to it. With a terrifying arrogance, some human beings in the past and even in the present seem to think that they can choose whom, of those created in God’s image, they can love and respect. In the holiday initiated yesterday for June 19th, we were given a strong reminder of the sad legacy of selective love, and the cost of setting that right.

So, our faith should add something vitally important to our relationship with the created order. Nature is not just a mechanism, a support system for our lives and cultures which must be maintained and tended, though that is part of it. It is also a gift of God, whose overflowing love never ceases to create beauty and complexity for the sheer joy of it.

Let us imagine, then, that in our communion today we expand the Lord’s table to include everything and everyone that God has made and loves. Let us with the eyes of faith believe that we are welcoming the entire creation to share in God’s gift to us.


Submitted by the Reverend Doctor Euan Cameron















June 13, 2021: Pentecost 3

Click here for Today's Readings

3 Pentecost: June 13, 2021

At this time of great concern about the health of our fragile earth, our island home, it is interesting to have a picture of God acting as a creative arborist planting trees to support life and provide beauty. Last week we had a picture of God taking an evening stroll through the garden enjoying the refreshing beauty of the good creation. And today we find Jesus sharing an image of a farmer at work. Something he would have observed growing up among the small towns and farms in the area around Nazareth.

Our Gospel reading comes from early in Jesus’ ministry. Even though last week we read that large crowds were following Jesus, there were signs of problems. Jesus’ family thought him to be out of his mind and religious leaders said he was possessed by the devil. The crowds seem to have been mainly miracle seekers who came and went. We know that when the crunch came, they disappeared.

In fact, in the chapters we are now reading, scholars believe Jesus was responding to questions why his mission, proclaiming the arrival of the kingdom of God, was having so little success.

We should also note that the community for which this Gospel was written was over twenty years later were in a similar position. Many scholars think Mark’s Gospel was written for a community in Rome who were experiencing persecution during which both Peter and Paul were executed, along with other leaders. They, too, were wondering where was the success. Where was the power of the Spirit and Resurrection? Where was the Kingdom Jesus proclaimed?

So, what was wrong? The parable we read today is among a collection of parables and sayings comparing the word of the Gospel with seeds. Before our story today is the parable of the Sower, sowing seeds over a wide area made up of different kinds of soil. Just like the soil, there are different kinds of people who receive the word. Only some actually receive the word and even then, some will fall away.

Today Jesus explains that the seed, the word he proclaims has real power and will ripen on its own time. And, finally, the word like the mustard seed may seem small at sowing but will result in spectacularly abundant growth.

I grew up on the prairie of Illinois, in an area of small towns and farms. However, the farmers I knew did much more than sleep and rise night and day as the seed grew on its own. They prepared the land, plowed the field, planted the seed, cultivated and removed the weeds and worked to prevent blight. I never got the impression that the seed just grew on its own. Maybe Jesus didn’t know that much about farming.

But I also learned from farmers that they knew no matter how hard they worked the harvest was, in so many ways, beyond their control. To begin with, the prairie’s rich soil was a gift they had not produced. They knew that the time for planting in Spring should not be too wet or the seed could rot. But as the seed began to grow it needed the right amount of rain and the right amount of sun and warmth. The young plants were vulnerable to blight and insects. All of these elements which determined the quality and size of the harvest were beyond the control of the farmer. They harvest truly was a gift.

Among the farmers there was no doubt that grace was essential to their work. The prayers offered in our Church were for rain, for warm sun, for protection from insects, and only then, thanksgiving for the harvest. They did not just sleep and rise in the process, but they believed their hard work needed grace, gifts they could not provide. Blessings over which they had no control, were essential to the harvest.

The members of the community who first heard or read these parables were meant to see them as explaining failures and disappointments in our Christian life. They were also signs of hope that ultimately the blessing of God would come. God had not abandoned them. God was present with them in the midst of life.

A few weeks ago, our Diocese closed a parish. It had been a large community which served many people for many years. It joins a growing list of parishes the Diocese has closed. The same process is taking place in the Roman Catholic and Congregational Churches. We might hear the question where is the success of the word. I don’t want to infer that our Church or any Church is the kingdom of God, but the number of communities are shrinking.

What is our response to this situation? Our opening Prayer today is a guide: “Keep, O Lord, your household the Church in your steadfast faith and love, that through your grace we may proclaim your truth with boldness, and minister your justice with compassion.”

If we do this, our work, we will have the hope that can empower us to endure, trusting God will do God’s work. God will give the grace, be the blessing that will embrace us so that we will endure. Amen

June 6, 2021: Pentecost 2

Click here for Today's Readings

2 PENTECOST: June 6, 2021

Today we begin the longest part of the Church Liturgical Year. From now until the beginning of Advent, Sundays will simply be identified by their time after Pentecost. The season begins without much fanfare. The Gospel reading plumps us down in the early stage of Jesus’ ministry in Mark’s account. Jesus has been drawing crowds, so many, we are told that he and his disciples could not even eat. Perhaps some disciples were caught up in the wave of popularity. But not everyone else was.

Jesus’ family, we are told, came to restrain him, take him back home, and stop this crazy talk about the kingdom of God. The reaction of these relatives “He has gone out of his mind” is matched by that of some religious leaders who said: “He is possessed by Beelzebul”.

Beelzabul is a name borrowed from one of Israel’s neighbors who believed in two gods – one god of good the other, god of evil – Beelzabul, or Beelzabub, means “lord of the garbage heap”, or “lord of the flies.” Jews saw him as the tempter, Satan. An evil spirit but not a god.

Religions have wondered about the source of evil in our world, in our actions. Some religions imagined a powerful evil god. Others focused on human freedom to choose. So, it is in our first reading. It is a story from the Book of Genesis. Part of a larger story that addresses the origin of evil. The story of Fall is not history, the eating of the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil presents an imaginative picture in which human disobedience is presented as a source of evil in our world.

But the reality of evil and sin touch on the mystery of suffering and even who we are in the world. Are we creatures made in the image and likeness of God? Filled with the very presence of the Divine? Or are we fallen, sinful creatures, saved, only, through an abundance of amazing grace?

It seems we can’t even agree about sin and what evil is. Recently, a number of states in this country have passed laws severely punishing abortion providers, even relatives who support a woman in the process. One state even offers a $10,000 reward to a person reporting such people. At the same time, some of these states have passed laws forbidding teaching school children critical history about slavery and racism.

We are members of a Church whose leadership’s response to abortion includes a refusal to support legal barriers to a woman’s right to choose. At the same time, our Church has called upon each parish to examine its relation to the sins of slavery and racism. Indeed, we are called to reflection, study and action. And yet there is no doubt. No disagreement about the reality of evil in our world.

In our Gospel today Jesus speaks about the need to plunder a strongman’s house only after the strong man has been tied up. Jesus is the one who has entered the house of the strong man, that is, the evil one and has tied him up. Evil has no lasting power. And now, Jesus is plundering that house, defeating the power of evil in our lives, in our world. It is as if a tree has been cut down at its roots. However, the leaves have not yet withered even though they are on a dead tree. The enduring power of evil has been destroyed, but this is not obvious, except with the eyes of faith.

Paul sees with eyes of faith. He presents a picture of growth, renewal. Even as some things are wasting away, Grace abounds. For although we have the power to sin, and are capable of evil and our actions often lack justice and compassion, still our Gospel reading ends with Jesus calling us his sisters and brothers and mothers.

With the power of those relationships, we can do what we prayed on our Collect: “Grant that by your inspiration we may think those things that are right, and by your merciful guiding may do them.”


May 30, 2021: Trinity Sunday

Click here for Today's Readings

St. Benedict is called the founder of monasticism in the Western world. Around 500 AD he wrote a Rule for monks. Among his wise words is an admonition to the abbot (the head of the Monastery) to make sure that those seeking admission to the monastic community were people “truly seeking God”. He does not say they should be people who had found God, but seeking God. In fact, Benedict considered the monastery a “school of the Lord’s service” where the monk spent his whole life, seeking God, in a life of prayer and work.

This consideration is fitting for Trinity Sunday. Trinity is at the heart of our faith. The Book of Common Prayer says: “The faith is this, we worship God in Trinity and Trinity in Unity”.

Seeking God is at the heart of faith because it seems to be at the heart of human desire. In the Holy History of our scriptures, as well as the Holy Histories found in the sacred books of the vast human family, in all sorts of tribes and nations, we find a search for God. It is so among our ancestors around the world and down through the ages.

At times, people have thought they found god and made an idol, an object or belief that they tried to appease, control or manipulate. This is a strong temptation faced by one seeking God. So there are dangers on this journey. Isaiah, in our first reading, reminds us of this. Somehow Isaiah has stumbled into the presence of God and, as he is reduced to awe at the magnificence of this presence, he realizes he shouldn’t really be there. In fear and trembling , he finally volunteers to share the wonder of this God with others. Isaiah has been reminded of an important truth, the God we seek is a God who seeks us.


It was so from the beginning. The “holy, holy, holy God” seeks Moses as he herds sheep. Yet Moses must “take off his shoes”, for he is standing on holy ground when in God’s presence. Later, Moses, returning from the mountain encounter with God, receiving the covenant, is told by the people to cover his face because the brightness caused by this proximity to God was blinding to the people. And when God reveals God’s name, it was seen as too sacred to pronounce out loud. The “I AM” in its Hebrew version was not pronounced. Another word “Adonai”, which means “My Lord” was said in its place when scriptures were read.

“Holy, holy, holy” is the human cry. The awareness of how awesome and great is our God.

But when we come to Paul’s reading today we hear him tell the Roman community that they are children of God and when they pray they are to address God as “abba”. “Abba” in the dialect of Hebrew Jesus spoke is best translated as “Dad” or “Daddy, Mommy” in English. In Jesus, God has a human face. Joined us in human history. And yet, Nicodemus struggles with this Rabbi, because Jesus, as Son, also transcends human history. “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God and the Word was God”, we are told at the beginning of this Gospel. We can easily say with Nicodemus: “How can these things be?”

But there is more – always more with this God. When Jesus speaks of one being born of the Spirit, he is not talking of human birth as Nicodemus thinks. The Spirit, which Jesus breathes into the apostles on the evening of Resurrection is the Divine Being that now dwells in all the baptized – in all created life.


And so, in our search we have encountered the awe inspiring High lifted up Holy One who has sought us out in human history. We have been told by human ancestors of the Divine one whose flesh they have touched and who has told us we are children of this “High Lifted up loving parent”. Finally, we have been given the Spirit as the continuing presence of this One to dwell within our human flesh.

Indeed, we are dealing with Incomprehensible Mystery. But we are seekers and we presume to give names to these three faces in which the God we seek, has sought us. “Father, Son and Holy Spirit” are most familiar, but maybe too familiar. Even names found in our holy history can become idols. A member of my previous parish left when I tried to assure him God was not a male.

We can think of this Triune God as Source and Future/ Transcendent and Imminent/ Indwelling Love as did a theologian of the last century. Source and Future is the Creator God and final home of all that exists; Transcendent and Imminent is God Present in the human Jesus as part of our human existence but also transcendent One who exists from all eternity; and finally Companion God, Spirit dwelling in each of us, here and now, as we continue to seek .

But we don’t have to journey far in our search. St. Elizabeth of the Trinity, who died at the dawn of the last century was a Carmelite nun who, as her title suggest was devoted to writing on this eternal Trinity. Elizabeth has written: “ I believe that Being whose name is Love is dwelling within us at every moment of the day and night, and asks us to live in his company.”

So, the invitation has been given. All we need is to respond. Amen

May 23, 2021: Pentecost

Click here for Today's Readings

PENTECOST 2021

INTRODUCTION

Welcome to our celebration of Pentecost. Pentecost, in Greek, means 50, and 50 days ago we gathered here to celebrate Easter. It is fitting that we begin to gather together on a regular schedule on this day, after more than a year. For Pentecost completes Easter with the celebration of the gift of the Holy Spirit, the presence and power of God’s abiding love that creates the Church, the community, THIS community that gathers to give witness by our words and deed to God’s presence in our world.

The Holy Spirit came upon the disciples while they were at prayer. As we pray, let us be open to the presence of this same Spirit so that we know again the power of God’s love . A love we are called to share with one another; with all others.

Let us pray:

HOMILY

Most of us are old enough to remember the name Dag Hammarskjold. He was a Dutch diplomat who served as Secretary General of the United Nations from 1953 until his death in an airplane crash in September 1961. He was on his way to negotiate a cease fire in a war in Africa. After his death, his family found his journal which revealed a person of deep faith. One of his last entries was made on Pentecost Day in 1961. He wrote:

“ I don’t know who or what put the question. I don’t know when it was put. I don’t even remember answering. But at some moment I did answer YES to Someone or Something – and from that hour I was certain that existence had meaning and that, therefore, my life, had a goal.”

Our readings today have two versions of a Pentecost. Each, however, is not as subtle as what Hammarskjold describes. In John’s Gospel on the evening of his resurrection, Jesus enters that locked upper room and breathes on the apostles proclaiming “Receive the Holy Spirit!”

In our reading from the Acts of the Apostles we find a large crowd gathered in prayer and with even more drama – shaking the house, tongues of fire – the Spirit embraces the disciples. The results, too, are more dramatic. They go out and to the crowd that gathered because of the wind, they begin to proclaim the good news. We are told that the group was made up of people from many different nations, gathered in Jerusalem for a Jewish feast. However, they all heard the disciples speaking in their own native language. What was that all about?

At that time, the Jewish feast of Pentecost had become a thanksgiving for the gift of the Law, Torah, the covenant between God and the Jewish people. At that time, a story developed in which the offering of the covenant with God was offered from Mt. Sinai not only to Israel but to the whole world. The voice of God from Mount Sinai was proclaimed to the whole world, heard and understood by all people in their own language. However, only one nation, Israel, accepted the gift, only one people entered into that relationship.

Now, the Acts of the Apostles is teaching, on the first Christian Pentecost, God is again offering this relationship, the presence of the Spirit, to all the peoples of the earth. Every nation, once again, hears the invitation in their own language. And now, people from every nation on earth are saying YES to this gift.

“All the people of the earth” are represented by 16 tribes and nations mentioned in our reading. Since then, we have learned that the world is a bit bigger. We now have 192 nations united in that group once led by Dag Hammarskjold. And in those nations are as many as 24,000 ethnic groups who speak almost 7,000 languages.

Most of the disciples present at that first Christian Pentecost never traveled more than 100 miles from Jerusalem their whole lives. And Paul, who journeyed all the way to Rome, traveled a distance that was less than NYC to LA.

The world into which the Spirit is renewed today is much larger, the diversity greater, the divisions wider, the tasks greater than those first Christians could ever have imagine. And, as we have seen, the missions of the Church have often led to oppression, violence and enslavement of nations. What is the mission given to us by the Spirit this Pentecost?

In the Gospel Pentecost the Risen Christ proclaims to the apostles “Peace be with you!” The gift of the Spirit is expressed as PEACE/SHALOM. Shalom includes a wholeness that demands justice, a concern for well- being that is expressed in compassion, gratitude that becomes generosity in actions, and a vision of harmony, unity that embraces the other as sister and brother.

In this large, changing world the Peace /Shalom of the Spirit is as present now as it was that first Pentecost. As we prayed in today’s Psalm: “O God, you send forth your Spirit and we are created; and so, through us, you renew the face of the earth”. All gifts ask something of the recipient. What is asked of us today is to believe who God is and who we are. Believe our existence has meaning and our lives a goal. Believe that today we receive the life-giving gifts of justice, compassion, generosity and love. What if the human family lived these gifts? What if you and I did?

May 16, 2021: Easter 7

Click here for Today's Readings

Easter 7, May 16, 2021

Since Easter Sunday, the first reading each week has been from the Acts of the Apostles. Acts is volume 2 to Luke’s Gospel, composed by the same author. Acts’ focus is the life of the earliest Christian Communities and the leaders who set about proclaiming the Risen Christ to “the ends of the earth”. In the early chapters, Peter is at the center of the group that saw themselves guided by the Holy Spirit, the gift of God’s abiding presence, that came upon them at Pentecost, which we will celebrate next week. This guidance did not have the clarity of a road map. It was with difficulty and conflict that they moved out of the security of that upper room into a world of different languages and cultures, laws and beliefs. As the Reverend David Brown has often said, “The life of the Church is like building a plane as we are flying.”

Initially, this small group thought their work would be of short duration since Christ promised to return. As time passed, they realized the “little while” Jesus spoke of would be quite a while. Commenting on this, one writer said that the earliest Christian Community waited in eager expectation for the return of their Lord in glory, but the Church showed up instead.

The community came to focus of Jesus’ words in a new light. By the presence and power of the Holy Spirit, THEY were the “body of Christ” on earth; THEY were the community in which the fulness of Christ dwelt. Although they couldn’t express it this way, THEY were the church, building the plane as they were flying.

If we look closely at these early years, we find one constant element. The community was never far from conflict. They were often groping in the dark, listening to the Spirit, often arguing about the direction they were going, adapting to situations, constantly facing punishment, prison, even death.

How different the situation in which our Church finds itself.Today the Church is close to the center of power, exerting influence on laws and customs. The Church is more apt to be aligned with the powerful, even the persecutors rather than united to the persecuted. A while ago I ordered a product for the Church. When I gave the address – 129 Main Street- the woman, located in Oklahoma asked, “is every Episcopal Church in Connecticut located on Main Street?” Geography hints at our status.

Even more, Ray Kroc, founder of McDonalds, aspired to have a restaurant in the shadow of every church in America. He considered the Church the anchor and supporter of societies values and morals. It certainly didn’t start that way.

Our Gospel today presents Jesus refusing to pray for the world. In this Gospel and the Letters attributed to John the “world” is presented as knowing neither God nor Christ. In fact, Jesus says the world hates his disciples because they do not belong to the world, just as he does not belong to the world. And yet both Jesus and the disciples are “in the world”. In an earlier chapter of this same Gospel we read “God so loved the world that God sent the only son that all might have life through him”.

“World” can have different meanings. The created world is called very good, in Scripture. In Paul’s Letters, the created world is presented as renewed through Christ. But there is the “world” that oppresses to poor, rewards the rich and powerful, casts out those who are different.

The Church has often confused the world that hates Christ and the world we are called to serve in his name; the world in which the Church lives comfortable at the center of power and prestige and the world that is offended by a Church that does justice and loves compassion.

As we build the Church in the world we pray in the words oftoday’s Collect: “send us your Holy Spirit to strengthen us,and exalt us to that place where our Savior Christ has gone before.” Our prayer must always be: “Come Holy Spirit!”

NOTE:

A graveside service for Kathleen Bannister will be held at Centerbrook Cemetery, Saturday, May 22nd at 11 AM.

NEXT SUNDAY, PENTECOST SUNDAY

In Person Worship on Lawn at All Saints. 10 AM. Bring a Lawn Chair. Chair provided if needed.




May 9, 2021: Easter 6

Click here for Today's Readings

Easter 6, May 9, 2021

The life of the Church is full of procedures. In the two dioceses where I serve, our bishops have supplied us with detailed directions to meet the requirements of both Church and State for the re-opening of public worship.We hope to begin to worship together at All Saints’ on Pentecost Sunday, following our inspiring and uplifting gathering at Easter. We shall all, of course, follow the requirements to keep everyone safe.

Two years after I arrived at Union Seminary in New York in 2002, I was asked to serve as Academic Dean, and did so for six years, often stressful and sometimes invigorating. I well remember a conversation with one of my successors (there have been three so far) in which I encouraged her to follow the seminary’s procedures, even if they seem to slow one down. Procedures are your friends, I emphasized. Following procedure means that when you make a decision, it sticks.

That was, I now recognize, quite a British way to think. Some of my colleagues in administration and board just wanted to get things done, by whatever seemed the most direct and effective approach. And here was this British person saying, “steady on, let’s go according to the rules, even if it doesn’t seem the quickest or most efficient way to reach our goal”. In my deanship we did some very controversial things, but they were never un-picked by review afterwards, because we had followed our own rules.

The author of the books we know as Luke and Acts was rather keen on procedure too. In the book of Acts, the apostles take on Christ’s leadership role after his ascension. They supervise the distribution of property ascharitable giving within the community. When the task becomes too sensitive and burdensome, they appoint (and in effect, ordain) a group of deacons to take their delegated role. Of all the evangelists, Luke seems to have the strongest sense that the Jesus movement had to work by some rules and, yes, procedures. In Acts, the movement becomes a Church.

Given the taste for structure and process in Luke-Acts, it is remarkable how, in that same work, the Holy Spirit works to bring new followers to Jesus. Last week, we heard the story of Philip and the unnamed eunuch of the Kushite kingdom. The eunuch had been to Jerusalem, so was possibly part of that most distant community of worshippers of the God of Israel. He is converted and baptized all in the same journey.

Two chapters on, in chapter 10, we encounter the story which, for the first time, unambiguously tells of the welcoming into the Jesus community of, not only a pagan, but a member of the hated, oppressive, brutal, and polytheistic occupiers of Judaea, a Roman Centurion called Cornelius. It is emphasized that Cornelius was a “good” Roman, but the insistence on his goodness only shows more clearly how troubling it was to approach such a person.

Our reading from Acts comes at the end of a long step-by-step narrative of how Peter, the most emphatic leader of the Jewish believers among Jesus’s friends, was with some difficulty persuaded by God to go and visit with a pagan. God sends a dream to Peter where all kinds of food are lowered from heaven, and Peter is told to eat of them. He refuses to eat unclean food. God answers with what sounds almost like Jewish humour. “What God has made clean, you must not call profane.” “Peter, whom are you accusing of serving non-kosher food?”

The story ends on an even more extraordinary note, in the passage we have just heard. The Holy Spirit descends, visibly and dramatically, upon Cornelius and his household after Peter has preached to them. These Romans display the same signs of charismatic inspiration as the disciples did at Pentecost. This is not happening according to due process. The gift of the Spirit was supposed to come after baptism. So, Peter calls for these new Spirit-filled believers to be baptized. (Did you notice that Acts does not say that Peter baptized them himself? Maybe he still had slight reservations, even though he stayed some days in the house of this Roman officer.)

Through successive chapters of the Book of Acts, the key character in the story who refuses to follow procedure is the Holy Spirit. The Spirit descends whenever, however and on whomever it chooses. And it does so by such evident signs, including speaking in tongues, that it leaves the disciples absolutely no choice but to obey its call.

Luke is by instinct and preference a procedure-bound kind of guy, but in these cases the Spirit of God does away with procedure and due process, and Luke admits the fact. He was saying something about the unexpected, surprising power of God to confound and burst open our tidy organized lives.

Due process is often associated with hierarchy, with a settled order of who gets to make which decision. That is certainly the case in Luke-Acts. But what about our Gospel passage today, from John’s Gospel? This reading comes from what are usually called Jesus’s “Farewell discourses”, the chapters of John’s Gospel which follow on the washing of the disciples’ feet at the Last Supper, and come just before the Passion narrative.

Of all the evangelists, John has the highest and most exalted sense of who Jesus was and is. His Gospel begins with the famous and cherisheddeclaration that the Word, co-existent with God in eternity, took human form and lived among people, revealing its glory through the life of Jesus.

Yet John also expresses the strongest, most emphatic, most often-repeated message that Jesus shares his very being, his closeness to God, with those who are his friends and his beloved followers. Today’s Gospel follows directly on last week’s almost-parable of Jesus as the vine and his followers as the branches. Jesus stresses repeatedly that his followers reside in, are one with, each other, with him, and with God. He uses a Greek word which is translated “abide” in our NRSV, which could also be read as “dwell” or “stay”. There is a permanent, stable relationship here.

There is a paradox: John portrays Jesus as both spiritually and in every other way exalted above us, and yet at one and the same time completely accessible. The only way it makes sense is if the followers of Jesus are, in effect, raised up in the Spirit to an unequalled closeness with God.

It is important, I suggest, to hold on to both sides of John’s (and Luke’s) paradoxes. As a community of faithful people, we are called to be close to each other and close to God. In our support for each other in times of stress, trouble, and grief, we express the love for each other which we are called to live out in our lives.

And at the same time, the Spirit of God has been reaching out, from the very beginning, to people whom human institutions might have been tempted to exclude – because of their religion, their race, their gender, or their sexuality. In the Episcopal tradition, we do not meet many who speak in tongues, but we certainly meet with those who are called by the Spirit. God calls us to welcome those who are different from us, not only into fellowship, but into leadership as co-workers in the ministry of the Gospel.

At seminary, I have had the privilege to meet many people who have at one time or another been declared unsuitable for ministry in the communities from which they came. Then they came to Union and discovered, not only that they were not alone, but that the voice of the Spirit was speaking, to them and through them, so powerfully that it could not be denied. To witness the growth in spiritual gifts of seminarians is to see the unruliness, the boundary-breaking generous love of the Holy Spirit in action.

So let us in all our lives be open to the call of the Spirit, not only to ourselves, but to others. As we approach the Pentecost season, we are reminded to be a Spirit-led community, a community of listening welcome. And let our procedures be open and flexible enough to make that welcome possible.

Submitted by Reverend Doctor Euan Cameron


May 2, 2021: Easter 5

Click here for Today's Readings https://www.lectionarypage.net/YearB_RCL/Easter/BEaster5_RCL.htmldings

Easter 5, May 2, 2021

In my younger days, as a young monk, I received a gift of Ella Fitzgerald singing her favorite hymns. I called it my Protestant Record, since it contained such hymns as “The Old Rugged Cross”, “Brighten the Corner, Where You Are”, “In the Garden”, and “Abide with me”.

Only later did I learn that this last hymn was not a protestant hymn, but was written by an Anglican priest, one time vicar of All Saints Church, Devon, England. The hymn was the favorite of Ella Fitzgerald, but also, Mahatma Gandhi.

While the hymn was inspired by a verse in Luke’s Gospel it is quick to come to mind when we read today’s Gospel of John. Jesus said: “Abide in me as I abide in you.” This is an oft repeated theme in John’s Gospel, the Divine Indwelling. To be a disciple meant to abide, remain in Jesus. Remain in an intimate, enduring, personal as well as communal relationship with Christ who remains within each of us. In you, the fullness of the Divine God dwells.

That is hard for many of us to accept. Perhaps we are too aware of our limitations, our faults and failings to place too much emphasis on the reality of God actually making a home in the likes of you and me. Even more, we are aware of the failings of others, to believe God abides in them. In today’s reading Divine Indwelling is joined to the image of the vine and the branches. We abide not only as individuals but as members of the community. Membership in this community is demanding, but entrance is not reserved to an exclusive group. It is open to all who seek.

Why else would Philip do what he did in our first reading. He is sent to meet a carriage traveling from Jerusalem to Gaza. He overhears a man reading Scripture. He is an Ethiopian eunuch. He would be considered some kind of freak by many today, but Philip engages him in conversation. “Do you understand what you are reading? “How can I?” is the response, “no one explains it”.

So, Philip does explain that Isaiah is speaking about Jesus, and tells the man the meaning of the passage. Soon, the man asks to be baptized into this Jesus, to enter into this intimate relationship of remaining in Christ. Surprisingly, when water is found, Philip baptizes the man, then and there. No classes, no trial period of church attendance. The desire, the request is enough. Philip was beginning a work and the Spirit, the Divine dwelling in the man would work to make this presence grow.

The emphasis here was not so much on the preparation of the individual before baptism, but on the transformation of the individual after baptism, a transformation that took place within and in response to the gifts the community shared with one another as they ministered the Gospel.

Since Easter, our scripture readings have focused on the various ways Christ is present within the community. We were told we are “children of God, deeply loved by God who like a shepherd watches over us. These readings, too, dwell on the power and responsibility we have to reflect the presence of Christ in the way we lived, worshiped and served others.

Today we learn that God dwells in each of us, abides with us, empowering us to love, to serve, to care for one another, and all others.

Divine Indwelling, Love one another, for only if we love one another can we love God, forgive, support, reconcile one another. Such words may sound a bit romantic in our age. After all we live in a complex, often hostile world. The reality is, the disciples who wrote and tried to live these words lived in a much more hostile world than we do.

For many, being a Christian was a crime, punishable by death. That was not hypothetical. Each of the Gospel accounts were written down in response to persecution. Living the words we consider inconvenient often meant death to those who handed them down to us.

It is interesting how we decide what words of Jesus are important and what words we think are outdated or suggestions. Far easier to accept the words of comfort than those that challenge. However, the One who abides in us is the same One who says, by this all shall know you are my disciples if you love one another. The challenge is more than we can do, except by the power and presence of the One who dwells within.

April 25, 2021: Easter 4

Click here for Today's Readings

EASTER 4 April 25, 2021

“I am the Good Shepherd,” Jesus tells his disciples in today’s Gospel reading. “Good” because he cares for the disciples, loves the disciples even to the point of laying down his life for them. Of course this reading comes from mid-point in John’s Gospel, long before the events celebrated three weeks ago; events at the end of the Gospel when these words of Jesus about laying down his life were proved to be true. Such dedication is demanded of a "good shepherd".

In our first reading, Peter, no longer hiding in that upper room has been arrested and stands before Ciaphas, John and Alexander. These are religious leaders who should have been good shepherds. They seem to be among the leaders the prophets have condemned as lousy shepherds. However, scholars today do not think it was these leaders John’s Gospel was warning the disciples about. At the time John wrote these words other Christian communities were creating roles and responsibilities in their attempt to organize their communities. They were giving the name “pastor”, that is “shepherd” to these leaders. These Christians are being warned that there is only one pastor, only one Shepherd- Jesus Christ. History has shown that there is wisdom in this warning as many of us called “pastors” have not been Good Shepherds.

Psalm 23, which we prayed today is among the most prayed words in the Jewish-Christian tradition. This psalm presents a job description of a “Good Shepherd”- guiding, feeding, protecting, working for the survival of those they lead. A pastor is called to follow Christ’s example, even to laying down one’s life for those they lead. I confess this was not part of my seminary training.

Unfortunately, many given the name and role of "pastor" have not been good shepherds but have acted more like hired hand. Care for the sheep has often been replaced by the search for power, prestige, wealth and control. Worse, Shepherds have sometimes acted more like wolves than shepherds.

But there is even more that must be said about the role of the shepherd. Shepherds are to find green pastures and springs of water for those they lead. Pastors must care for all that supports life, and our well being and the well being of others.

Also, Jesus, the Good Shepherd speaks about planting, sowing good seed in good soil, pulling weeds, pruning vines, plowing field's and harvesting abundant crops. He mentions the mustard seed, the fig tree, the vineyard and fishers casting nets, all images and metaphors for living now and in the kingdom to come. Jesus assumes that disciples will care for the creation God brought out of nothing and declared to be very good. Somehow, we seem to have forgotten. But now other shepherds, scientists, call out to us. As we celebrate Earth Day this week, we must hear them, and hear Nature itself and renew our commitment to be disciples that follow the Good Shepherd in caring for what God has so lovingly created and generously given to us. But as with all gifts, there comes responsibility.

One theologian has written that for more than 2000 years we human beings have thought and taught about faith as though we were looking in a mirror – We describe and respond to God in relationship to us : who we are, what we are called to be, to do. Certainly this is important. But, this scholar suggests, we must begin to look out the window, look at the rest of creation, the world of plants and trees, animals and insects, whales and fish - all , like us, God's handiwork.

She quotes the great naturalist, John Muir, who on a trek in the wilderness came upon the dead body of a giant bear. He paused and admired this marvelous creature and then wondered, "Is God's love broad enough to include a bear"?

But even more. Does God's love embrace all of creation: whales and wolves, sheep and cattle. bees and birds? Does God’s love embrace "all things bright and beautiful, all creatures great and small" with whom we share this Island Home?

Our Holy History recorded in Scripture begins: “In the beginning, God created the heavens and earth, and all that crawls on the earth and swims in the sea; and God saw it was very good”. The final words of this Holy History declare: “Behold I make all things new, all creation new.” , St. Ambrose said that in Christ’s Resurrection all creation rose, all creation was renewed, proclaimed anew to be very good.

Concern for creation is not just one of many current issues. This Island Home is the stage upon which God encounters us, embraces us, joins us in Jesus, redeems us and journeys with us. Spiritual writers speak of the Natural world as a sacrament, a sacred sign that reveals the glory of God. The Holy Spirit, God’s continuing presence is not reserved to human beings but enlivens all creation. St. Paul proclaims: “All Creation groans in expectation for God’s children to be revealed”.

Unfortunately, Creation is also groaning because of depletion of ozone, melting ice caps, rising seas, fires, droughts, and floods. We know that God’s love is broad enough to include bears and fish, birds and insects, mountains, seas and rain forests. Is ours?

We are all old enough to remember the picture of our earth taken from Apollo 8. One of the astronauts on that flight commentated that this view of our Island Home was perhaps the most important reason for going to the moon. We see the beauty and unity of our earth.

Sadly, the power of this vision has not transformed how we see our world and our place in it. We need to pause, to be grateful, to be in awe for the beauty of the earth and all that dwells therein. We need to commit ourselves to be good shepherds. Amen

April 18, 2021: Easter 3

Click here for Today's Readings

EASTER 3 April 18, 2021

Spring is a time when nature revives and regrows, and we are grateful. Until the rains came on Thursday and Friday, daffodils were holding up their heads in our yard. They are a bit beaten down now, but the forsythia bushes are blazing yellow all across the north-east corner, six feet tall or more, mocking our feeble attempts last summer to prune them down to something more compact.

And at this time, many people mark the return of flowers by sending them as gifts for Mother’s Day. Ruth and I find it slightly confusing, in that Mothering Sunday in the UK comes much earlier in the year than the American version, on the fourth Sunday in Lent. This year that date fell five weeks ago, on March 14th (which was the last time that I preached for All Saints’). Because of the earlier spring made possible by the Gulf Stream, our last parish in England was able, even in March, to present everyone with some daffodils to mark the season.

Easter is a time of much more than natural regrowth. Yes, we remember that in John’s Gospel, 12:24, Jesus likens himself to the grain of wheat that falls into the earth and dies, in order that it may germinate in spring and multiply itself in great fruitfulness. However, Jesus’s resurrection meant something very different from the natural cycle of death and rebirth.

That was why it was so hard to come to terms with.

Something which I love about the New Testament is that, even while it insists that the death and rising again of Jesus was foretold and prepared in Hebrew Scripture, it also consistently describes how bewildering and confusing the appearance of the risen Jesus was to those who were closest to him. Several times it is said how the disciples were “terrified”.

As today’s collect reminds us, on the second Sunday after Easter Sunday (Easter 3) we often read the story of the disciples on the road to Emmaus, and how Jesus joined them, unrecognized, on the road. (You will remember that Jesus then gave them a seminar on Scripture to explain how the Messiah was foretold to suffer as he had done, as though he had never done so before.)

Today’s Gospel reading from Luke follows directly after the Emmaus story. It is still the same day when the tomb of Jesus was found empty. No sooner have the two disciples rushed back from Emmaus to Jerusalem and told their friends of their experience, than Jesus himself appears among them, and insists on proving that he is raised in his body, by eating some food with them.

After that, a few verses describe Jesus taking the disciples out to Bethany and then how “he withdrew from them”. That is the end of Luke’s Gospel. It is a little less compressed than Mark’s, but it’s still almost brutally quick. The development of the story has to wait for episode 2, in the Book of Acts.

The disciples were bewildered, and for good reason. Despite Scripture, or maybe even because of it, there was no script to follow in responding to Jesus’s resurrection. There was all too much experience of confronting oppression, tragedy and loss. That was how it was in the Maccabean revolt, in the sufferings of those who tried to defend Judaea against oppressors. Between Jesus’s resurrection and the writing of Luke’s Gospel there was even more tragedy, in the disastrous uprising against Rome in the 60s and the destruction of the Temple in 70.

It is easier to get one’s head around bad news (because so much of the things that mark life are tragic) than it is to embrace the extraordinary power and promise of the resurrection. There was no pre-prepared way to understand and respond to something so new.

We still struggle with the resurrection. Christians have disagreed and will disagree about what it means. Reasoning it away into something else, such as some profound transformation in the disciples’ minds, has helped some Christians to cope with the scandal of proclaiming resurrection in a scientific world.

What matters is the proclamation which emerged from the disciples’ experience. Jesus was not resuscitated like Lazarus, or the widow’s son at Nain: Jesus rose into a new form of life. Jesus’s incarnation was received back into God, in such a way that Jesus’s complete humanity is not lost, but glorified. Luke takes the most care of any of the Gospel writers to stress that Jesus’s body was raised as a functioning human body, but also one that transcended ordinary limitations. Human nature, created in God’s image in the beginning, is welcomed back into God’s own being.

For the disciples, everything changed and nothing changed.

Everything changed in the sense that they now had the power to preach the message fearlessly, as Peter did in our reading from Acts. Peter, who so recently denied even knowing Jesus, scolded his audience for what they had done to Jesus, then offered them forgiveness because they acted in ignorance.

Nothing changed, in the sense that the disciples were still mortal (it was traditionally believed that of the apostles, only John died a natural death) and that they suffered persecution both from the religious elite and from the political powers. They were strengthened for mission, but mission became much harder. Before Jesus’s resurrection they could not possibly have coped with the hardship.

For us too, nothing has changed, yet everything has changed.

Resurrection joy is not something that we summon up in ourselves. If we make too much effort to do so, it won’t work. The resurrection hope does not abolish suffering and loss. We have experienced too much suffering and loss in the past year, and are continuing to do so.

Resurrection tells us that there is no limit to the will and power of God to love us. That unlimited love was poured out for us in Jesus’s suffering, and there was still infinitely more love left. God’s power showed the disciples, in Jesus’s rising again, that God is far stronger than the pain and loss that oppress our existence.

God calls us to trust that reassurance, without speculating about our eternal destiny. For this life, we have work to do; God will take care of what lies beyond. We are called to build the best possible foretaste of the community that a loving God wishes for us. The risen Christ invites us to spread the message of this special community – traditionally called the kingdom of God. In the community of the first followers of Jesus, we see the familiar paradox with which we still live. Because Jesus was raised in glory, the kingdom is already among us; but its fullness is not yet visible.

In the reading from the first Letter of John, the letter-writer (who may or may not have been the same as the compiler of the fourth Gospel) treats the kingdom as so utterly present, that those who live in Christ will by that very fact become like the risen Jesus. That reading contains the rather intimidating phrase that “all who have this hope in him purify themselves, just as he is pure”.

In the two-part book that we know as Luke-Acts, there is a more realistic portrayal of a group of followers who are gradually finding their way, amidst a hostile environment and their own internal struggles, to build their new life in Christ. Our scriptures are so precious, because they offer some of the most psychologically honest stories that we shall ever read, about what it means to live in company with each other and the risen Christ.

Our new life is not our achievement or our performance. It is the presence of the Spirit among us, which Scripture also describes as the power of the risen and ascended Jesus. Our new life is liberation, given to us so that we can bring liberation to others. It will not mean that our churches or our communities are perfect. It does mean that we are given faith, power and energy to make them as good as they may be and far better than they are.

As we have seen recently and will continue to see, there is plenty of healing and rebuilding work to be done. As we live into the Easter hope, let that hope inspire us to do all that we can to build God’s kingdom.


Submitted by Euan Cameron

April 11, 2021: Easter 2

Click here for Today's Readings

EASTER 2 April 11, 2021

Today is one of the few Sunday's when we read the same Gospel story year after year. Our story, from John's account, begins "when it was evening on that day". And what a day it has been. In the morning three women went to the tomb to anoint the body of Jesus. In John's Gospel they found... so they ran to tell the apostles. Peter and the one called the beloved disciple ran back to the tomb and found it as described. Mary Magdalen who had stayed behind encountered Jesus near the tomb and eventually comes to recognize the Risen Lord.

Now it is evening and Jesus comes and stands among the frightened, confused group and says "Peace be with you". He then breaths on them and says, "Receive the Holy Spirit".

The action of "breathing on them" looks back to a creation story at the beginning of the Bible. (Genesis 2) In that story God is pictured as a potter at the wheel, scooping down, taking clay from the earth and creating a human form. Then breathing into the clay the breath of life, making a living human being. Now, in that upper room life is renewed.

In John's vision, eternal life is present here and now. The life we share is eternal. But even more, the scene presents John's version of Pentecost. The Holy Spirit is breathed into the community. The advocate, the helper, the encourager now dwells within us. What glorious news!

Thomas, is out and about and misses this most sacramental moment. When he returns and is told the glorious news, he is skeptical. "You mean to say that the one crucified on the cross, the one the women said was not found in the tomb was here in this room and breathed on you and said: "Receive the Holy Spirit!" Yes they assured him. He doesn't believe it. But he has good reason.

"If what you are telling me is true", Thomas might have said, "why are all of you still locked up in the room; why are you still hiding, bound by fear. Where are the signs of this new and abundant life? Where are the signs of the presence and power of the Spirit." It all looked the same to Thomas.

A few days earlier, when Jesus washed their feet, he said: "by this all shall know that you are my disciples, that you care for one another, that you love one another. Thomas recognizes that something is missing. Where are the marks of the Spirit; where is the power? He had the right to doubt the story.

Thomas hangs around this locked up group and the following week Jesus came again. He invited Thomas to check out the wounds in his hands and feet, the wound in his side. Without doing so, Thomas makes the most profound statement of faith in the Gospel: "My Lord and my God". Thomas is not the doubter, but the believer.

Then Jesus says something more startling. As one scholar has said, it is as if we have been the audience in the darkened theater watching the story of the Gospel unfold on the stage. Now, Jesus pauses and has the lights turned on so that we, the audience are visible. Jesus turns to look at us and assures us: "Blessed are you who come to believe even though you do not have the opportunity to see me."

We, too, are invited: Receive the Holy Spirit! We, too, are challenged how we will be signs of the presence and power of God's love in our lives, in our world, in our very being. In the first reading we see an early attempt to live in a community "of one heart and soul, everything owned in common, sharing all their goods." That didn't last. But we do want a community, as we have been reminded this past year. The "Beloved Community, as John Lewis said.

The lives of those disciples hiding in that upper room teach us that discipleship has a cost. Love your enemies; do good to those who persecute you; feed the hungry, cloth the naked; forgive; do justice, love compassion; have an active concern for the poor, outcast, the foreigner; take up your cross and follow; love one another. Clear, but not easy. Possible, perhaps with the support of the Beloved Community.

In John's Gospel, faith is a verb, presented as a process, something that grows. That is the lens through which we should look at Thomas in today's story. Faith is a verb, which means it changes, grows, faces new challenges. doubts, seeks, finds support, keeps us going. We need a community to keep us going.

The life of faith is expressed in the words of Samuel Beckett, the Irish playwright: Sometimes there is a torch in my head and I see all things clearly. But then the light goes out and I am left with images and analogies." So it is in a life of faith. So today we hear Jesus again, turn from the pages of our bible to look at us and assure us: blessed are you who have not seen and yet believe. Blessed are you when the torch burns bright; blessed are you when the light seems to have gone out. Know, always, that I am with you; know always that you will always have life in my name, always a place in my presence."

Thanks be to God. Amen

*************************************

Note 1: Friday was Holocaust Remembrance Day. I sent a note to Rabbi Bellows and the community of Congregation Beth Shalom in Chester that we will remember the cost in human lives of anti-Semitism and oppose it whenever and wherever. In the words of Rabbi Abraham Heschel: "Not all are guilty, but all are responsible." Let us respond.

Note 2: Where do we go from here? Having gathered outside at All Saints for Easter Worship, the question is, what next? We are discussing possibilities. At present, I think we return to Zoom until Pentecost (May 23). After that, I suggest we meet outside, on the lawn for Sunday Worship and move toward celebrating Holy Eucharist. People bring lawn chairs and we will provide for those who cannot. My understanding is that Connecticut is stuck at a rate of infection that gives me caution. Vestry will meet in two weeks to discuss the future. We welcome your input. Contact one of us.


April 4, 2021: Easter Sunday

Click here for Today's Readings

EASTER SUNDAY April 4, 2021

Easter is such a wonderful feast. Not only does the feast celebrate the mysteries at the heart of our faith but Easter arrives as Spring begins its magic. the changes we long for - Light, warmth, renewal of life all around us. It's a little bashful this year but it is here.

This Easter holds a special meaning. Winter's death-like appearance has been nothing compared to the hundreds of thousands of deaths in our Nation and the millions around the world. On this day, the story of Easter light casting out darkness, hope overcoming despair, life conquering death is best experienced through the eyes of faith.

More that ever, today's Easter story pulls us into a living drama. We have much in common with the three brave women who make their way to the tomb. Their hearts ache with tragedy, the death of their friend; their hopes have been crushed. It is a terrible time.

"Come follow me" was the invitation extended by Jesus of Nazareth a few earlier. They did, and heard wonderful words and saw wonderful deeds. The glory of God seemed about to burst into this world. Instead, disaster struck. Jesus was arrested, beaten, executed. All that remaind was to make sure their friend was properly buried with the ritual prescribed by their faith.

We, too, have learned that things do not always turn out as we had hoped. Relationships fail, dreams are often unfulfilled, hopes can be crushed, loved ones die. We share much with these women as we walk with them to the tomb.

Oh, but now another problem. The women remember the tomb has been sealed with a large stone. "Who will roll away the stone for us?", they ask one another. The stone would prevent the sacred rite of burial. Stones have been obstacled for us in life. Behavior, attitudes, prejudices - our own and others- have prevented us from becoming the persons God created us to be. Fears, wounds, grudges, illness have burdened us, kept us in a tomb. "Who will roll away these stones for us?"

But when the women arrrive they are amazed; the stone has already been rolled away. How? By whom? The Gospel does not say. It isn't by magic. We know that in our lives the "stones" that limit us don't just disappear. And yet, there is something more than just our effort at work. There is grace- God's transforming love is real and present. In his Letter to the people of Corinth, Paul tells them three times that God's grace, God's powerful presence, was essential to his growth, the power to become a disciple.

With the stone rolled away, the women enter the tomb. But Jesus is not there. Instead, they find a youth dressed in white who announces the Good News: " Do not be afraid! Jesus has been raised! Go tell his disciples and Peter. He is going before you.." But our passage ends with the women running from the tomb, in fear and trembling and they tell no one because they are afraid.

Something is wrong. If they told no one, how come we are here? Down through history the story has been told and finally told to us. How can this be?

Who has continued to proclaim what the youth in white announced to the women? Well who is this youth dressed in white? From the earliest days of the Church, and down through the centuries, on Easter morning there were many youths dressed in white. They were the newly baptized, fresh from the Vigil just concluded. The baptized are sent to proclaim the Resurrection. Mark has drawn us into the drama. We are given a most important role to play.

We are called to "be not afraid" ; called to proclaim that Jesus goes before us, travels with us, empowers us to live lives of hope and service, of compassion and healing, reconciliation and love. Our live are to proclaim the good news of Easter: Christ is risen! Alleluia.


The Renewal of Baptismal Vows

Celebrant Do you reaffirm your renunciation of evil and renew your commitment to Jesus Christ?

People I do.

Celebrant Do you believe in God the Father?

People I believe in God, the Father almighty, creator of heaven and earth.

Celebrant Do you believe in Jesus Christ, the Son of God?

People I believe in Jesus Christ, his only Son, our Lord.

He was conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit

and born of the Virgin Mary.

He suffered under Pontius Pilate,

was crucified, died, and was buried.

He descended to the dead.

On the third day he rose again.

He ascended into heaven,

and is seated at the right hand of the Father.

He will come again to judge the living and the dead.

Celebrant Do you believe in God the Holy Spirit?

People I believe in the Holy Spirit,

the holy catholic Church,

the communion of saints,

the forgiveness of sins,

the resurrection of the body,

and the life everlasting.

Celebrant Will you continue in the apostles’ teaching and fellowship, in the breaking of bread, and in the prayers?

People I will, with God’s help.

Celebrant Will you persevere in resisting evil, and, whenever you fall into sin, repent and return to the Lord?

People I will, with God’s help.

Celebrant Will you proclaim by word and example the Good News of God in Christ?

People I will, with God’s help.

Celebrant Will you seek and serve Christ in all persons, loving your neighbor as yourself?

People I will, with God’s help.

Celebrant Will you strive for justice and peace among all people, and respect the dignity of every human being?

People I will, with God’s help.

The Celebrant concludes the Renewal of Vows as follows

May Almighty God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has given us a new birth by water and the Holy Spirit, and bestowed upon us the forgiveness of sins, keep us in eternal life by his grace, in Christ Jesus our Lord. Amen.




April 2, 2021: Good Friday

Click here for Today's Readings

Good Friday 12 Noon

Order of worship

Opening Prayer

Hymn: What wondrous love is this 439

Solemn Collects

Reading 1 Isaiah 52:13 - 53:12

Psalm 22

Hymn: When I survey the wondrous cross 474

Reading 2 Hebrews 10: 16-25

Passion according to John

Reflection by Euan Cameron

Christ was condemned to death, and died, at what by any human standards seems a horribly premature time, at the height of his ministry of teaching and healing, and through the machinations of corrupt forces.

Why was this necessary? From the earliest years of the proclamation of Christ crucified and risen, Christians have tried to explain exactly what purpose the death of Jesus served.

The author of the Letter to the Hebrews, probably writing under the shadow of the loss of the Temple, explained that Jesus had become the one sacrifice to end all sacrifice, the one who initiated a new relationship with God.

The letter to Colossians wrote that God through Christ [erased] “the record that stood against us with its legal demands. He set this aside, nailing it to the cross.”

So many explanations: none tells the full story; none can express the mind of God.

Suppose that we interpreted the suffering of Christ as the pattern for all our sufferings and those of the whole world?

Suffering is evil; it is not “redemptive”; it is not “worth it” even in the end.

However, it is the special gift of God to show both love and power through and in the midst of suffering

That is what the Psalms so often proclaim: that when life seems bleakest, the power of God is always closer than we can even imagine. We hear that message even in Psalm 22, the psalm of desolation that Jesus quoted on the cross.

God identifies with those who are downcast and humiliated, as in the suffering servant depicted in the poetry of the follower of the prophet Isaiah who wrote our first reading.

And that is what happens here: Christ went to Jerusalem because he could not teach and proclaim the kingdom of God in a corner; he could not minimize or silence the message.

And for whatever complex of bad reasons, enough people decided that he must be stopped.

But the love that forced him to keep on teaching, healing and witnessing would not allow that.

And in his painful torment and death, the loving power of God was revealed: God took what seemed to be a futile waste, and turned it into triumph through the Resurrection, which we shall celebrate in a few short days. God turned Jesus’s death into a unique proclamation, a message that could be read in so many ways … but however you interpret it, it speaks the power of God to save and the endless love of God for those who suffer.

From this point on, suffering whether individual or collective, whether great grief or private pain, is enfolded in the love of God. We are blessed with a saving, loving God who does not rejoice in triumphing over, or humiliating others. Our Christ made himself one with those who grieve, those who are humbled, those who live with affliction. In our care for all those near and far who experience suffering, let us bring the love of Christ to them, as it is brought to us.





March 28, 2021: Palm Sunday

Click here for Today's Readings

PALM SUNDAY March 28, 2021

Opening/Introduction

We begin the week we call Holy; the week we celebrate the mysteries at the heart of our faith - the Passion/Death/Resurrection of Jesus Christ. Shouts of praise will give way to shouts of ridicule, humiliation and condemnation. Palm branches vanish and the Cross appears.

We pause, however, to acknowledge that moment of triumph

Reading : Brendan

Blessing

Hymn: All Glory, Laud and Honor

Collect of the Day

Reading from Isaiah 50: 4-9 Mindy

Psalm 31: 9-16 Pat

Reading from Paul's Letter to the Church at Philippi chapter 2: 5-11 Pat

Intro: to Gospel Reading

The fact that we are here today reminds us that the story we are about to hear again does not end with death. Our presence at worship today is witness that life is stronger than death. Also, we are here not to celebrate suffering and defeat, but to proclaim the victory of love and life. We will read the Passion Story today, and on Friday. But in these stories of Jesus' death, the way he died, crucifixion, is never actually described. Typical is Mark's version read today where we are told: "Then they took him out and crucified him". The author did not wish to emphasize the terrible suffering of Jesus, but the love that accepted this suffering - a love without limit and without end. Let that be the drumbeat you hear throughout the Gospel reading and throughout this week, in all our life.

Dramatic Reading of the Passion of our Lord, Jesus Christ,

according to St. Mark

Following the reading there will be a period of quiet reflection

Hymn 458 My Song is Love Unknown

Prayers

Hymn 473 Lift High the Cross

******************************************************

Please join us Good Friday via Zoom at 12 Noon for our Worship


Easter Worship will be via Zoom but also outside at All Saints at 10 AM . We will set up chairs properly distanced. Wear Mask. Service will be Morning Prayer.





March 21, 2021: Fifth Sunday of Lent

Today's Readings

Jeremiah 31:31-34
Psalm 51:1-13
Hebrews 5:5-10
John 12:20-33

Years ago an uncle of mine who was a pilot for an international airline told me on his journey to a foreign land he came upon a street vendor who offered to sell him an autographed picture of Jesus Christ. He passed up the deal. The Gospel does not say anything about the physical appearance of Jesus. And, I am sure the paintings by Italian or German or Dutch artists we have seen bear little resemblance to the Middle Eastern Semite named Jesus.

Even though the four Gospel accounts have no physical description of Jesus, they each present an "image" of Jesus, and they are different. This is not surprising when you consider that our Gospel accounts all existed in oral form, repeated in stories over many years in different communities, different nations and societies. Beginning 30 years after the death and Resurrection of Jesus, the first, Mark's Gospel, achieved the written form we have today, and the other three accounts were written down in different communities and circumstances over the following forty years.

On Palm Sunday we will read the Passion of Jesus from Mark's Gospel account, written down around the year 70 AD, possibly in Rome. Five days later, on Good Friday, we will read the Passion Story from John's Gospel, written down almost 30 years later, possibly in Ephesus, present day Turkey.

We find very different images of Jesus in these two Gospels. Simply stated Mark's account emphasizes the humanity of Jesus, while John's focus is on the divinity of Jesus.

In Mark's Gospel Jesus will say he doesn't know some things and when we find him in Gethsemane praying to the Father on the night of his arrest, he asks if the "hour might pass from him". In today's reading from John, Jesus refuses to pray that he be saved from "the hour", for that is the very reason he has come. The "hour" of his passion and death.

In Mark's account, Jesus prays that " God's will be done"; in John's account Jesus prays that God be glorified. In Mark's Gospel we see the human Jesus struggle with fear and uncertainty; in John's account Jesus seems to be in charge, even directing the events leading to " the hour".

What unifies all the Gospel accounts is that Jesus' passion and death are not the result of his being in the wrong place at the wrong time, but in the fact that Jesus saw his mission to reveal that God so loved the whole world with a love without limit and without end, even to the extent of laying down his life for us. So often we hear that God sent Jesus to die. Jesus came to reveal God's love for this human family. Humans chose How to react. Jesus is killed by human beings, not by God. We have done this other times to other people who proclaimed a similar message.

In today's reading Jesus paints a picture, demonstrating that life and death are joined together. Only a dying seed bears fruit. Our presence here today shows the truth in Jesus' statements: his death and resurrection have given birth to the Church. But there is a leap of faith required to go all the way with Jesus' words: that we must walk the same path. Those who love their life will lose it and those who hate their life in this world will keep it for eternal life. "Hating one's life" means living in an unselfish way, deeply concerned for the well being of others, willing to give one's life for the life of another. If my whole life is lived only for me, how can my life nurture others?

Human suffering is the challenge. While the Gospels were written at different times and places they were all written in a crisis. Those who had come to faith and been baptized in the power of the Resurrection and filled with the Spirit still found themselves bearing the cross, even suffering death because of their faith in Christ. Where was the victory?

The unifying message of all the Gospel accounts is that in Jesus, God does not free us from suffering but joins us in the midst of human suffering. The promise is that God is present with us and will keep us to eternal life.

In this pandemic where would we be without the people risking their health their lives caring for the ill? Also, we witness people giving their lives doing justice and loving compassion in our world. Many lives do become grains of wheat dying but bearing much fruit.

Today is the first day of Spring. It's been a long winter, but the green shoots of daffodils and bright color of crocuses are visible . New life is returning. All this happens without our work. But mercy and kindness and healing and love, care for the suffering and dying, justice and hope and love can only exist if we plant them life. They exist in our world, in our society because of those who have lived the power of the Spirit and become the seeds of faith and love and hope for us. Easter calls us to live our lives, plant the seeds that will give life to those who come after us.

March 14, 2021: Fourth Sunday of Lent

Today's Readings

Old Testament: Numbers 21:4-9
Psalm: 107:1-3,17-22
Epistle: Ephesians 2:1-10
Gospel: John 3:14-21

Today is the fourth Sunday in Lent. For those who know the obscurer corners of the liturgical calendar, this is “Laetare Jerusalem” Sunday, or “rejoice Jerusalem”. It has been marked as the Sunday in Lent when the disciplines and abstinences of the Lenten season were eased up for a short while.

On this day, highly liturgical congregations still exchange the purple vestments of Lent for a rose colour. Deeply as we all yearn for the time when we can share the Eucharistic celebration together, let me confess that I am grateful that none of the parishes where I have served has so far chosen to use rose vestments. I’m sorry: I just do not believe that pink is my colour.

However, there is a serious point. The sober, even sombre tone of the Lenten season is not just there to help us feel gloomy, as though there were not already enough in the world for us to lament over. Sundays like this one serve to remind us that, in the Hebrew Scriptures and in our New Testament, lament always happens under the loving gaze of God: the God who stands by us in hard times, and passionately seeks our healing and our restoration. Lent is not just a preparation for Easter and the celebration of resurrection; it is an integral part of it.

The first verse of our Gospel passage today anticipates Christ’s crucifixion by likening it to what in Christian tradition was called a “foreshadowing”: the raising of the bronze serpent by Moses to heal those who had been bitten by snakes in the desert, described in our first lesson from Numbers 21.

This image of the serpent on a pole is enormously familiar, even to those who may not know where it comes from. It has become one of the most universal symbols of healing, whether in the form of two snakes twined round a pole (known as a Caduceus) or a single snake suspended from the top of a pole (sometimes called the rod of the Greek god of healing, Asclepius). You will undoubtedly have seen these emblems on the side of ambulances, on the logos of hospitals, or for that matter on the badges of members of the Army Medical Corps.

For such a widely used symbol, it is intriguing how uncertain the story of the serpent in the wilderness is. In the Second Book of Kings, chapter 18, we read that the reforming king Hezekiah “broke into pieces the copper serpent that Moses had made, for until that time the Israelites had been offering sacrifices to it; it was called Nehushtan”. The detailed story that we read in the Book of Numbers may have been elaborated from the legend that Moses had made the bronze serpent: though in truth serpent-gods were all over the world of the ancient Middle East, and it is possible, even somewhat likely, that the image that Hezekiah destroyed was derived from an Egyptian cult object.

Why, you might wonder, do we associate snakes, which we think of as harmful, with healing? We do not know for certain, but the association seems quite ancient. Possibly the snake’s shedding of its skin was taken as a symbol of new life; possibly the way that snakes, as cold-blooded animals, can regain energy with dramatic speed when the sun reaches them, was taken as a symbol of healing and recovery.

Healing, its wonders and its limitations, has been on our minds for the past year. God has brought healing to many in this terrible pandemic, through the skill of the medical and nursing professions, and through the prayerful support of families and friends, even when that could not be expressed face to face. In the last months, though the skill, determination and energy of the scientific community, God offers us the promise that vaccination will dramatically reduce the severity and the spread of the infection.

Yet not all are healed in body. Far too many lives have been cut short, an unimaginable over half a million in this country alone, and we cannot even know how many millions around the world. Moreover, the entirely justifiable focus on the pandemic has had a secondary impact, in that many people have found that treatment for other conditions has become more difficult. At the very least they have been deprived of the contact with family, friends, supporters, or indeed chaplains, which it is well known often plays an important role in healing.

The Israelites did not become immune to the bite of snakes in the desert. Though God loves us utterly, we still fall sick, because vulnerability to sickness, and mortality itself, are parts of the nature of which we are made.

Yet Jesus, in the account which we read from John chapter 3, says that through his ministry those who believe in him will have eternal life. When John wrote his Gospel, the communities who followed Jesus had been reflecting on the meaning of his death and resurrection for some seventy years. They believed that the loving power of God had been shown to be stronger than death itself: not because death was taken away, but because it did not have the last word.

The healing of which Jesus spoke was of a very special kind. It was a renewal of life even within life itself, which Jesus expressed as a new birth, as “being born of water and Spirit”. Our Gospel reading today comes from the long conversation between Jesus and Nicodemus. Nicodemus was one of the sophisticated, cultured Jewish philosophers and believers of Jesus’s time. His name comes from the Greek language, which many learned Jews (including our Gospel writers) used as their natural means of expression.

Nicodemus, we learn, sought Jesus out at night, to escape the controversy and distraction which could follow from speaking to a teacher who stood outside the circles of privilege. By an elegant, literary paradox, Nicodemus comes to Jesus by night, in the darkness, and so doing he enters into a greater light than his own learning and wisdom could ever give him.

As the 17th-century poet Henry Vaughan wrote about this encounter, in his poem “The Night”:

Wise Nicodemus saw such light

As made him know his God by night.

Most blest believer he!

Who in that land of darkness and blind eyes

Thy long-expected healing wings could see,

When Thou didst rise!

And, what can never more be done

Did at midnight speak with the Sun!